the city western here on geary street and assess close by the way, if it is true that the cal hallow association is in - this tells us if you look at the agreement between the two of them it should reassure that you cal hallow as often as we want to go into the cal hallow and larkin street and observe didn't say any limitation on times of the year between the two groups of cal hallow and larkin that means they'll look at the apothecarium is interacting with the residence inside under from time to time i think you should be further assured that will be properly supervised a good site and keep these in mind the planning commission put in that the permit holder cvs has to come back a report by the neighbors how the neighbors felt this and i hypotheses fit into the neighborhood and the planning commission as you may know has a right 0 revoke any permit upon a violation of any rules that supervision and the close supervision by cal hallow of larkin street should assure you this will be kwalg sprfrdz problems will be observed and dealt with there is recourse thank you. >> what does you think of the 21

> commissioner honda and board members aim president of the canceling hallow association and mother raising two daughters in the cal hallow area the association represents over 3 hundreds and 50 pedicab households in the 35 block area before pacific to lombard since 50 years i want to state the cal hallow association didn't have an issue are medical marijuana the hundred testimonies you'll hear this not our issue that is perfectly fine we do not have an issue are the business practices you'll hear lots of people talk about a great organization we have no issue with with that we have filled this and stated pubically not oppose is one thousand feet from the many oth authorized store locations in the north san francisco a positive beef for the lombard to today they've inquired off other possible locations eve they're made it is simply impossible they're not willing to rent to us everyone has no struggle we ask the organization if they have any telephone records that might support of claims of refuse of all mcd property the answer we could a have yet and this is an affordable housing for history of housing insecurity t

and have a seat on a couple of seats in the community i'm here for microfilm because the cal hallow associations opposing the apothecarium they're trying to protect the youth some years ago they stopped the demonstration and a second for seven years i want to let you alumni know we're supposed to be edward the second the development was stopped i ended up having a full-time working graveyard and going to city college of full-time it was dangerous none wanted to rent i have of color and no credit history during this fight against edward the second dozens of my counterparts feel into addiction and with holes in their arms because of no other way to survive; right? and actually having to choose between buying a book or bag it it using easy to coming come up here and use 5 or of or 7 hours to do things like this because you've not dloifrdz things like this the cal hallow you have judgment around the apothecarium will do in the community and feel that will cause more harm and the people that cannabis about cause here to say i port of apothecarium understanding the harm by the neighborhood associatio

note that property is up the hill from my property it bigger than it is i want to note the cal hallow associationuidelines definitely state that out of size or out of scale properties shouldn't be allowed to fringe on open space in mid block areas. >> thank you very much for your consideration. >> thank you. i have a couple of questions. >> sure. >> how long have you accident on the block. >> i've lived there i think almost 10 years. >> and how did you become aware the property was not conforming or legal. >> i didn't become aware until the neighbor proposed this expansion i looked at that. >> that's when it came up thank you very much. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. we'll take rebuttal from the variance holder anything further to add. >> we have nothing further to add but i'll answer questions. >> i have several the property was purchased 4 years ago that's correct. >> 4 years. >> was that disclosed at the time of purchase since the full disclose with illegal work to the property. >> no, it wasn't and any currents be action with the previous owner. >> the previous owner owned that foreclo