this is at a cala in the mission, this is their space, highly used as a social space, people sittingon the ground eating lunch and walking around, but it has to have exactly the right signage and exactly painted on the ground the international symbol for accessibility. you have to have a drop off zone next to it which is what the striped area is on the right-hand side. however, you know, just because you have a blue placard or a red placard in your car doesn't mean you can park any place you want in the city and here yesterday down on california street they are towing someone with a disabled placard hanging on their windshield from being parked in a yellow meter for delivery. okay, we have a question in the back. >> just a quick question. you have parking. what about other ancillary accessory areas like storage? if it's accessible for, say, tenants in the building or employees, does that have to comply with accessibility standards? . >> there is access to storage room requirements in the text of the occupancy specific. i think you find it in the b's and the m's, typically, not in the

statements that they maybe just can't believe that somebody such a high ranking like nominee straus cala be paraded around in handcuffs for the media but i mean it really is that just an illusion or a real justice system in this country just because you see somebody who's a high profile case in hand does that mean that we're actually going to see a fair trial. i think that we still see a fair trial that's why prosecutors and defendants are very careful when it comes to jury selection the jury is not supposed to pay attention to the media that's very important and you know of course and i don't blame them french officials are concerned about the perp walks you know but you have to keep in mind that we don't intentionally do perp walks when suspects are being transported from one place to another of course the media is going to take their photos in handcuffs and then they're going to publish those photos officials in france right now are saying that that's wrong because it makes people automatically assume that the suspect is guilty i think that's a legitimate concern however i have a prob