we filed comments and reply comments, both as a city and in collaboration with calcca. we participated in several conversations with cpuc staff. the utilities and other parties trying to influence the outcome there. we joined stakeholders in making our views known on the steps of the cpuc before the vote. the p.u.c. ultimately adopted a much-improved resolution. i think largely as a result of that participation. we still remain concerned about the process that was used and are evaluatesing with the city attorney whether we should be filing an appeal at the cpuc over those process concerns. it engendered quite a bit of activity at the cpuc, this item. they took over an hour of public comment prior to conducting their business. that's not typical at that entity. so, the c.c.a. folks came out and made sure that the california p.u.c. understands the concerns of the community. at that same meeting, the cpuc also adopted their integrated resource plan approach. they've establish add two-year cycle where all load-serving entities -- those are entities that provide retail elect