this one, thisne will calcify. >> it was one of those moments. no matter where you come down. this is ugly, brutal and here, like the rest you sending messages back and forth saying i can't watch anymore. >> it is watching a divorce. whatever it is, itjust, that's what i mean. the two parties feel like irreconcilableff ences. they don't want to believe the other side might be telling the truth. >> it is the people at the center of it.>> it was 52-48 for clarence thomas. i feel having covered every confirmation hearing since bork. i f like something is wrong with our cspoli i feel sick to my stomach indeed. >> i will say this. it is never permanent. we weren't there in the 1950s and 60s. it was mccarthy, that was an ugly era of american politics. you know, we can get through it spot.e're in a rough >> the culmination of so many things happening. how divided our country is. i've never seen, i have nev seen federal judge cry. i have never seen somebody on the d.c. circuit court of appeals, one of, if not the most respected court in the nation, in tears on national television repe

one expects when you close an antitrust investigation the market is going to be less calcified, the companyquestion is going to be less entrenched there's going to be more start-ups and so forth. we are saying the opposite. maybe we should take another look at this. i think were beginning to see the tide turn. >> tucker: good for senator hatch but i think there is 99 other guys in the same chamber. what would be the justification quickly for not acting? i don't understand. >> we have a completely new slate of ftc commissioners running public hearings now to collecton information and i'm cautiously optimistic they are going to re-examine a lot of the questions. >> tucker: are not an american company it's a multinational. this is a foreign threat to our country. thank you for the work you've donema. freey online services aren't actually free, they come at a cost. you're paying that cost, in privacy. we'll get the details ahead when you rent from national... it's kind of like playing your own version of best ball. because here, you can choose any car in the aisle, even if it's a better car cla

one expects that when you close an antitrust investigation the market is going to be less calcified,t there are going to be, you know, the company in question is going to be less entrenched. there is going to be more startups and so forth. we are seeing the opposite. maybe we should take another look at this. i think we are beginning to see the tide turn. >> tucker: good for senator hatch there are 99 other guys in the same chamber. where are they? what would be the justification i can requestlquickly fornot acting? >> we have a new slate of ftc commissioners running public hearings now to collect information. i'm cautiously on mits stick that woptimistic to re-examine some of these issues if we should. >> tucker: it's a multinational. foreign threat to our country. that's my view. it's a national security threat. thank you for the work have you done on this. >> thank you, sir. >> tucker: free online services aren't actually free. you may have known that they come at a cost. you are paying that cost in privacy. we have got details ahead ♪ ♪ ♪ when you have something you love, you wan

that were being withheld from the public, i felt the public had a right to know and they weren't calcified, no national security issues. and we disagreed on that and i locked horns with people across the aisle and even after all of that, i was grateful for the comedy, the denim and i knocked horns with most said i was taught to hate the sin but love the sinner. i really love being on this committee. i love it. from living in newark, new jersey, this is where i wanted to be. i wanted to be on a committee that dealt with issues of justice in this country because i feel that when we swear an oath to liberty and justice for all, i don't think we're there yet as a country. and i have to say now as i'm sitting here, that i deeply resent this idea that somehow when dr. ford came forward that this dealt with partisanship. this has shifted this debate in this committee and in this country from rob partisanship to something much deeper. i have such respect for the ranking member, and i was in the room when we discussed literally hours after i was made aware that the letter existed about what her mot

and when that capacity for change is, becomes calcified as it has become in our corporate state, then you redirect. when you redirect all of the wealth and the systems of power to a cabal -- in this case a corporate cabal -- you leave behind the majority of your population to fester and to express in very self-destructive ways the pathologies that i write about in this book. and, you know, what i fear is that this time around when capitalism goes down, we won't have the progressive party, the old cio, an independent press, labor unions, you know, wobblies. we won't have any of that. and, you know, in the 1930s europe went one way, italy, germany, spain, and we went another. and i just see especially with the rhetoric coming out of the white house and the rise of these trump mini-mes in places like florida, you know, and the transformation of the republican party into a kind of party built around a personality cult. i worry that we will swing -- we have the potential to swing to a kind of corporate-backed, christianized fascism. >> on that hopeful note -- [laughter] [applause] thank yo