and today set up where they just given this sheet is a calculate these arithmetic calculations? >> i'm afraid i cannot going to quite the detail about the differential equations that they use. >> for the methods they use. >> there was only doing the strength of differential equations and it was in the beginning, it was a lot that they were given many of these early equations they were plugging in numbers. so they were adapting the equations as they went. it was sort of like a spreadsheet as they were putting these numbers in. then of course the work change quite a bit later. so it is funny because i actually originally included a lot of these equations in my first draft of the manuscript. and my editor felt like nobody wants to see those. [laughter] >> i do. >> they got taken off and now i wish they had been in there so i can show you a peek at them. >> today's pencil and paper or calculators? >> these pencil and paper. they also had calculators, these large bulky desk calculators but i was surprised at how little they could do. i mean it was kind of shocking that you're such a

they were doing all of the calculations by hand and to the first computer programmers. they were trained in early computer languages and they were the ones that wrote the first programs from the mind to the planet.and then over the years of course it changed quite a bit. these are women mostly retired in the 1990s. some of the last projects they were done with the rovers. but there is still one woman from that original group that works for you today. too friendly. she was hired in 1958. and she has nasa's longest-serving female employees. >> what particular project is she working on today? >> she is working in juneau which is our mission to jupiter.>> next call for nathalia holt coming from victoria in charleston, south carolina. hi victoria. >> hello. i've heard the question about the fact that they were actually women working in the enigma program about figuring at the codes and stuff. i just wondered if you might have heard of any women that might have been native american working with them to do the clothes in world war ii debbie or that there were any women, native

one calculating it is 1,670. >> shocks me.cted it to be. >> if this is what you do not eating enough. over time your body is going to slow down metabolism. >> reporter: next calculating bmi. body mass index. one of the best indicators of weight related health. according to online calculators my bmi its 25.6. in the overweight category. but after determining my exact body fat percentage, using this body pod, doctors at mount sinai found my real bmi is actually lowe eer 23.4. within the healthy range. why, because online calculators don't account for muscle mass. take a look. the two people have the same bmi. clearly they' lly very differen compositions. >> very important. major limitations. if you are large and-up have a lot of fat, doing a good job. however we know muscle is more dense. if you have a lot of muscle your bmi is going to come high. >> last, we come pare our results with three popular fitness trackers. according to the chamber, i burned 3,240 calories in 23 hours. but all of the trackers significantly overestimate

fisher cost has no place in this calculation? no matter how expensive it would be and impact in, let's say, a poor school district would be on the general student population? costs can't be considered and do you think in the real world school boards are disregarding costs entirely? they are definitely not disgu d disrega disregarding price entirely. but more generally i would say the answer is no in the usual case. in cedar rapids, the court said you can consider cost in what the standard should be but cost can't define what the standards are. that makes sense to me in light of the way you look at the statute. congress knew when it passed the law there was going to be significant expenses associated with some kids. that is why it gave money and made it an opting program. cedar rapid and the structure of the statue tell you in the reason case it can't be cost. >> you know what percentage of the funds that are spent by school districts for this program are paid for? >> i think it is 15%? >> the federal government pays 15%? >> i thi

fisher that cost has no place in this calculation? no matter how expensive it would be and no matter what the impact in, let's say, a poor school district would be on the general student population, cost can't be considered? and do you think in the real world, school boards are disregarding costs entirely? mr. gornstein: so they're definitely not disregarding costs entirely, because there could be two different programs, both of which are reasonable, and they would take into account costs, surely, in deciding which of those reasonable programs to adopt. but more generally, i would say the answer is no in the usual case. and -- and from cedar rapids, that's -- what the court said is you consider cost in deciding what the standard should be in the first place, but cost can't define what the standards are. and that makes sense to me in -- in light of the way you look at this statute. congress obviously knew, when it passed this law, that there were going to be some significant expenses associated with some kids, and that's why it gave mo

so i'm thinking well maybe it should be something like reasonably calculated to provide? >> we agree with that. that is what rowley said and that's what it means to require. it is a program that is reasonab reasonably calculated to make significant education in light of the child's circumstances. >> for all of us who might be a little slow, tell me what the new standard you are proposing is. i don't mean to be buying into your adversary's position. i do think the act provides enough to set a clear standard. the words are what we are trying to come to that would be less confusing to everyone. >> one formulation that i think would be consistent with what we are saying is reasonably calculated to make progress that is appropriate in light of the child's circumstances. >> how does that actually work in practice? i understand the rowley standard. you are dealing with somebody who has a disability that is rea readily addressed so they can keep track with grade progress. if you are out of that realm where that is not realistic in light of the child's potential, how do you decide

it calculates the percentage that boeing is trading right now above its 150-day moving average.s only been here about four times in its history and at this point, almost every time, is about where it corrected. so over bougt, however you might want to characterize it and then there's this. this is the chart of the past two or three years. this is often called a mega phone and people use these as a way to measure where you might end up stopping. we're right at the top of the mega phone. to my eye, that's your next move. if you've got gains in boeing, you have to have gains, take province, if you like selling short something that's extended, too far too fast, do something, sell boeing. >> technical warning signs there. how are you trading boeing? >> this is an interesting case. it's hard to bet against a company as well managed as boeing has historically been but there are dynamics going against it here. number one they are going to be slowing their deliveries of the triple 7 and increasing the single aisle aircraft like the 737s, we're talking about a significant revenue decline

that calculation is still the same. if the first priority of any member of congress is to stay in power they have already made the calculation. >> or the democrats? >> what's the role if your opponent is failing? do nothing. their best play is just to stay out of it and let the civil war and in-fighting play out. there's no reason for them to inject themselves into this. >> will they for neil gorsuch? >> how far they want to go out on a limb to make a point about 60 votes is a tough calculation, the further they push it the riskier, at the end of the day he's likely to get confirmed. they're trying to figure out when to exactly fold. >> they're going to need six more before the nuclear option becomes their only option. >> graeat to have you. >>> how the trump administration will renegotiate nafta looks like nothing -- a draft shows the administration won't withdraw, will not ask for sweeping changes, some are comparing it to what hillary clinton proposed, but there's one section, that states this. translation the govern

we're seeing how fitness track and calculators stack up.and you have more information. >> good morning, guys. there are tons of app, products and websites that claim to be able to tell you your metabolism, bmi and how many calories you're burning but just how much can you count on those calculations and could they actually be derailing your weight loss efforts? they're the tech tools for weight loss. online calculators and wearable trackers measuring your fitness and calorie burn. but just how accurate are they? >> everything online equations and, you know, devices, they only predict an estimate so it's a rough guesstimation. >> reporter: we compared their findings with the most precise measuring device available. this room, the metabolic chamber at mt. sinai st. luke's hospital. i spent 23 hours inside. i'm stuck in here for the next day. to determine exactly how many calories i burned. by measuring my oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. first up my resting metabolic rate. basically my metabolism. the calories my body burns j

one calculating it's 1,670. but the chamber says for me those are all off. rate almost 1,800 calories a day. much higher than i expected it to be. >> if this is what you do when you're not eating enough over time your body will slow down its metabolism. >> reporter: next calculating my body mass index. or bmi, considered one of the best indicators of weight-related health. according to online calculators my bmi is 25.6, in the overweight category. but after determining my exact body fat percentage using this body pod, doctors at mt. sinai st. luke's found my real bmi is actually lower, 23.4, well within the healthy range. why? because online calculators don't account for muscle mass. just take a look. these two people have the same bmi, but clearly very different body compositions. >> it's very, very important but it has major limitation. >> reporter: last, we compare our results with three popular fitness trackers. according to the chamber i burned a total of 3,240 calories in 23 hours. but all of the trackers significantly overestimated that number. one of

and i don't know whether that's part of their calculation or not. i don't think nancy pelosi even enters into anybody's consideration during this vote. >> for a president whose brand is all about being a winner and not a loser and being a negotiator, deal closer -- >> right. >> it's a big problem. i know they think they're going to be able to throw all the blame up to pennsylvania avenue, but if indeed this goes down, this is president trump's first major legislative attempt on a promise that he made in his launch speech of his campaign and every day throughout the campaign never mind the seven years of the party overall. this is going to be a body blow to this administration. i'm not saying they're going to crumble, but it is a severe loss for them. >> everybody stand by. we are counting down to what the white house says will be a 3:30 p.m. vote on the american health care bill, we will see if that takes place, and always talk to a member of the freedom caucus who just held an 11th hour meeting, what's in, what's out. you are watching cnn's special

everything i do is calculated. >> did they threaten to fire you? >> they did. that's very apparent, but i never want to play the victim. and i never want to point fingers that, oh, i felt like i was mistreateded. i wish everyone the best. >> no hard feelings on his end and with what do you think about rumors after brandon mychal smith could be his "agt" replacement? >> we're a community. you have to look it build one another up. when you see someone else getting opportunity all you can do is salute limb. >> i sat down with him as he was prepping, a show that he created, now in his ninth season. "wild and out." he's hosting a talent search for the next cast member. >> he also has a movie out soon and continues to make music for what really has people talking this wild youtube video blog that let some worry he was coming unhinged. >> nick, nick, what? >> people saw that blog and said what's going on with nick. >> all right, enough with the politricks. >> it's so fun pip people can be blogging and people say, what's wrongry him? i'm an artist. i get excited when p

. >> if you calculate your bonus based only on the 15 percent of low income for the 50 percent ami you get a partial bonus. >> would get a partial bonus but as we've heard in order to reach a feasible project you need to achieve the maximum bonus you might not choose to do a bonus if our numbers are accurate. >> we're saying the same thing a projecting is a project if you're building your performa this proposal says you need the full density bonus program for 2 or 4 or whatever for the full bonus you need it to get it full bonus and you'll not get that if you provide 15 unit and others for a percentage of ownership so i stand by my comment that is extraordinarily inconsistent and needs to be worked out at the board level philanthropically i only have a few more things i agree with the idea of making projects have some sort of bonus to you go up in the air to create the density in other words, to accommodate everyone we can't you know slice us the piece in terms of the envelope of zoning so many ways we can slice that pie we have to find more pie go up-or-out he be more dense and densit

calculator armando's used. >> yeah, but it's his system. >> we are the brains of this operation. any neanderthal can flip a house. >> okay. >> armando gave me $30,000. >> he's [bleep] in the head. >> [ laughs ] i've got to find a way to either make him believe in my system or get him the hell out of my company. >> i did something stupid. i bet my job. >> i'm in over my head. >> [ laughs ] >> any neanderthal can flip a house. >> this is going to be a huge problem for my company. i'm the king, and this is my capitol. >> i wouldn't even wish this on my worst enemy. [ knock on door ] >> come in. grab a seat. how's your programming project coming along? >> it's going well. yes, sir. should have it done in -- in a few days. >> what about the other software? then i heard you tell diane you have your own software that you're doing. i have an issue with somebody in my company saying that everyone that flip houses doesn't know what they're doing, essentially. and -- >> when it comes down to it, you know, my brain just functions on a higher level than the average person's brain, and -- no o

if there is one thing that has more attention is how you calculate the trade deficit. if we need to say that exports are something else that needs to be calculated and subtract it then you get a much bigger account deficit and trade deficit. then you are opening up the door to if we can do that then we can discuss any statistic. it is possible not only on election bias but it is possible that many of these to get some different calculations if you say that part of the sample was a little bit different. it can be somewhat dramatic. at the end of the day we are somewhat worried about the recent noises and what does the trade show and how the changes might come through. >> would you be okay if there was a change but it was possible to the old series remain or do you think any big change is dangerous? >> the global context is the united nations has clear standards. very clear standards for how you do everything on trade statistics. we can't just say they don't have a standard. we can do it much better. you get back to the emerging markets saying if the u.s. doesn't have to

life was a calculation of the law of ultimate results. forces might be unjust and everyone might know they were unjust, but there they were. the world is a question of cause and effect. he believed the results to which certain causes tended. he did not believe those results could be hastened or impeded. his political history since the agitation of the slavery question has been based on this theory. world in which all who were -- he wrote narratives come up empty. silenced by the shrieks of passion. political history is judged by the criteria. given how difficult equality is to achieve, becomes a resistible to embark on a search for flaws in the nation's heroes. everything is discounted as it's authentic, prejudicial, artificially constructed. warre often told the civil bill ofevant, the full toil has not of been paid. that abraham lincoln was a racist as if the deaths of those soldiers in lincoln himself didn't count in the balances. how different was a view a century ago? north, tolstoy was confronted by a tribal chieftain theis curious

margo lee shattering which tells the story of the black female mathematicians that nasa whose calculations helped propel the us in the space race. from best-selling author joan didion comes two extended excerpts from her never before seen notebooks in southwest. a look at the best-selling nonfiction books according to powell's books continues with a biography on adolf hitler. hitler, a sent, 1889-1939. that is followed by collection of essays on life in harlem by james baldwin. notes of the native son. next, explain the definition of feminism for the 21st century in we should all be feminists. followed by a look at the future of humanity. a look at nonfiction books according to powell's books is the biography of donald trump, originally published in 1993, lost tycoon. that is look at the current best-selling nonfiction books according to powell's books in portland, oregon. some of these authors have will be appearing on booktv on c-span2. you can watch them on our website, booktv.org. >> people on the left, progressive democrats march in lockstep. it is amazing. the tape has surfaced in th

people are still making the calculation that this crime is sometimes wortrth it. in environmental crimes cases, we don't have to prove motive. don't have to prove why somebody did it. but it is what every juror r and every judge e wantso know. ralph:h: from my experience,e, the motivation out there to pump oil in the water comes from greed.d. james: it's always about moneye. follow the money. richard: the united states is the only country that has a whistleblower award. on a ship, it's a small space, and people know what's taking place in that space. "fabrication of pipe connected to overboard as per instruction of first engineer." the osg case began with a foreign ferral. canada suspected that the ship was dumping, and they were right. but in our investigation, one ship led to another ship to another ship. and 12 osg ships were found to be involved in illegal conduct. to have a company this large, a publicly tradeded company, a company headquartered in the uniteted states o of ame, engaged in this type of criminal cocondt was shocking to o us. oe the investigatio

catherine johnson was one of the so-called human computers, who proved that her manual math calculations were more reliable than the computers in nasa's early >> this one in the middle. >> okay. >> that's supposed to be catherine johnson. >> if they say so. >> well, that's what they say. and we've all gone to the movies to s does that surprise you? it does? >> yes, very much. >> you don't know that you're an international sensation? >> for what reason? >> because of what you did. >> did i rob a bank? >> catherine johnson has a terrific sense of human, certainly not the introvert some might imagine a mathematics genius to be. >> we know that you did some incredible things when you worked at nasa. john glenn could not take a trip without you saying it was okay. >> yeah, he was like me, he didn't trust that they put everything in the computers. >> john glenn trusted her telemetry calculations over those from computers that were relatively new at the time. he knew her equations done by hand had worked for some very high-stakes missions. how did she feel about so much weight riding o >> no pr

it calculates the percentage that boeing is trading right now above its 150-day moving average. it's only been here about four times in its history. and at this point, almost every time, it is about where it corrected. so overbought, however you might want to characterize it. and then there's this. this is chart of past two or three years. this is often called a mega phone. people use these as a way to measure where you might end up stopping. and we are right at the to that. to my eye, that's your next move. if you've got gains in boeing. you have to have gains. if you like selling shorts. here's a candidate for you. too far too, fast document something. >> all right. some technical warning signs. >> this is an interesting case. hard to bet against a company as big as they've been. they'll be slowing their deliveries of the 777. and although they are releasing them. it will be a more revenue growth. and more competition on the smaller aircraft. >> exactly right. >> we are going to see some revenue declines. 19 times earnings. i'm inclined to go along with carter. i think the way

for overflow room per the controllers study and changes to the way the affordable housing fee is calculatedand the way it is sliced also income levels quite a bit of changes new definitions defining them as averages within a range of ami rather than a set number that didn't succeed the ami level and identifies the residents also new provisions that have not been section 415 both have's a form of schedule annual increases as to the controllers study both have provisions with the state density bonus. >> law and both proposals have additional unit mix requirements so with that, i'm going to skip ahead a little bit to slide 31 in the interest of time and those waiting to speak before the commission we can come back if those details are unclear at any time the first, the project feasibility within the charge of prop c and the purpose of controllers study that is the name the game the question would either proposal to become economically infeasible so this table compares to the controllers study that was the first set of numbers on the left looking at did 18 and 20 important onsite those are the

even beyond this conference of how do you these things and how they're calculated. if there's one thing in particular that's got more attention, more recently, is of course how you characterize the trade deficit. if we need to go back and say that exports are suddenly something else that needs to be calculated, subtracted from exports rather than imports, then you get a much bigger current account deficit and much bigger trade deficit. then you're opening up a door to, if we can do that, then we can discuss any statistic. it is possible, not own -- only on this election bias issue of who is the answering the phone, but to get some different calculations. if you say the sample was a little bit different than what we actually had. and it can be somewhat dramatic in some cases. but at the end of the day, we are somewhat worried about the recent noises, how those changes might come through. david: would you be fok there was a change but it was still possible to the old series remain soccer it was possible to do comparisonss? or do you think any kind of big change is dan

the calculations in the healthcare legislation could have a dramatic impact on the baseline used to calculate tax reform. it's not something that will be easy to do at the same time. you do need the healthcare calculations to move forward with tax reform or else you're going to have to strap the legislation. if you don't have healthcare passed by the time you get to tax reform. it's a difficult balancing act if you want to do both. >> real quickly. is it your sense here that there's more votes regardless of this healthcare thing. more votes, more republican support on the tax cut front, especially among the freedom caucus, than there was on the healthcare thing? >> i do. that's my sense. because there isn't as much politically riding on tax reform. it's known that republicans want to lower marginal rates. they want to cut taxes. there's not any sort of strong promises like there was with obamacare. we're going to repeal it. it's black and white. this is what we're going to do. conservatives felt that the bill put forward -- with tax reform, there's more wiggle room with what policies are put

so >> so sorry i didn't want to make you talk. >> the circulation is the feeds are calculated based onthe construction type and calculate the fee based on the cost of construction for that particular construction does and have to utilities those fees or construction of the same construction type whereas in the current program the feeds flow into the affordable housing and fund the projects where they maybe in a neighborhood fund a wood frame over other building or find an 85 point building we don't often find the high-rise building; right? that's the circulation of you know of things that can be resolved through the modifications of the legislation in the future there is - what i've tried to avoid is low money for specific very, very specific - whether construction types of or small geographic areas so having you know money for new construction of a high-rise building means i'll have to save of money up to the point i can fully finance a high-rise building how long will it take me to garter the fees for this purpose i mean, i would have to go obviously buy the appropriate site it reduc

i calculate how much home i can afford. i get multiple offers to compare side by side. the best part is... the banks come crawling to me. everything you need to get a better mortgage. clothing optional. lendingtree. when banks compete, you win. okay! ...awkward. >> it is not as terrible as he appears. >> kill the beast! >> think of the one thing you always wanted. feel it in your heart. >> disney's live action version of beauty and the beast hitting theaters across the country. emma watson asbell, dan stevens as the beast, hoping to be the first $100 million opener of 2017, reportedly cost $300 million to make and market. the original beauty and the beast was released in 1991 and became one of disney's most beloved animated films. and musical about the controversial drug executive martin shkreli comes at the same time that he is set to appear in court on charges of securities fraud. it debuted last summer under a different name as part of manhattan film festival. it focuses on his $2 million purchase of the exclusive right to an album. >> time for sports, no shocking up

those tax cradts would no longer be calculated on income but calculated based on age. the cost sharing subsidies, there are also on covered california cost sharing suxdies to individuals who are low income. instead the proposed bill will create a patient and state stability fund that would give states flexibility to use this money for high risk pools, payments to insurers or providers or other affordability measures. under the disproportionate share hospital program, commissioners may remember that program is scjed to sunset. it provides funding for hospitals that provide disproportionate share of care to uninsured and medi-cal beneficiaries so in this scenario the dish funding is restored. that sun set date would be eliminated and our state restored in 2020. the other key element i have is essential health benefits. commissioners may remember there is a standard set of health benefits that are included in the affordable care ac. this would eliminate the minimum coverage requirement effective twept 2020 and increase flexibility for states. it should be noted too that i

i'm thinking while maybe it should be something like a reasonable calculated amount. that is what rollie said. that is what it means to require. and all of us may be a little slow. now tell me what the new standards you are proposing to the adversaries position. i do think it provides enough to set a clear standard the words are what we are trying to come to that would be less confusing to everyone. >> one formulation that i think would be consistent in light of the circumstances. >> how does that actually work in practice. someone has a disability that is ratably address. that they can keep track of great progress. that is not a realistic goal in light of that child's potential you are sitting on at the meeting with the provisions it tell you what to start. you look at where the child currently is in terms of academic performance what are the present levels of achievement. then you examine the disability and you ask to what extent has this impeding in the general curriculum and what you do was there someone at that meeting. >> you've educational experts who will say

those tax cradts would no longer be calculated on income but calculated based on age. the cost sharing subsidies, there are also on covered california cost sharing suxdies to individuals who are low income. instead the proposed bill will create a patient and state stability fund that would give states flexibility to use this money for high risk pools, payments to insurers or providers or other affordability measures. under the disproportionate share hospital program, commissioners may remember that program is scjed to sunset. it provides funding for hospitals that provide disproportionate share of care to uninsured and medi-cal beneficiaries so in this scenario the dish funding is restored. that sun set date would be eliminated and our state restored in 2020. the other key element i have is essential health benefits. commissioners may remember there is a standard set of health benefits that are included in the affordable care ac. this would eliminate the minimum coverage requirement effective twept 2020 and increase flexibility for states. it should be noted too that i

those tax cradts would no longer be calculated on income but calculated based on age. the cost sharing subsidies, there are also on covered california cost sharing suxdies to individuals who are low income. instead the proposed bill will create a patient and state stability fund that would give states flexibility to use this money for high risk pools, payments to insurers or providers or other affordability measures. under the disproportionate share hospital program, commissioners may remember that program is scjed to sunset. it provides funding for hospitals that provide disproportionate share of care to uninsured and medi-cal beneficiaries so in this scenario the dish funding is restored. that sun set date would be eliminated and our state restored in 2020. the other key element i have is essential health benefits. commissioners may remember there is a standard set of health benefits that are included in the affordable care ac. this would eliminate the minimum coverage requirement effective twept 2020 and increase flexibility for states. it should be noted too that i

brexit is dominating politics and as the chancellor makes his spending plans, it dominates his calculationsi regard myjob as chancellor as making sure that our economy is resilient, that we have got reserves in the tank, so as we embark on the journey that we will be taking over the next couple of years we are confident that we have got enough gas in the tank to see us through that journey. no nhs cuts! but domestic pressures are building up as well. there are repeated calls for more money for the nhs, plus claims social care is in crisis and desperately needs extra funding. the chancellor says this is no time for a spending spree, but labour is warning more needs to be done. what we are saying is we will have a fair taxation system and we will tackle tax evasion and avoidance, we will make sure there are no longer giveaways to corporations and the rich. we will invest in our economy and grow the economy and on that basis we will be able to afford the public services that we need and we will also be able to have fair wages. the chancellor might have abandoned the target and timetable of his

we wrote that we understand it might not be possible for the intelligence community to calculate this number with precision. but it is difficult for us to accept the assertion that it is not possible to come up with even a rough estimate of this number. when generating a size estimate, if it would require too much labor we would be willing to accept an imprecise one. so we asked about imprecise numbers. law-abiding americans are getting swept up in these searches that the law says are designed to target foreigners. so we asked about orders of magnitude. is the number closer to 100 or 100,000 or 100 million? we still got no answer. and section 702 was reauthorized without this necessary information. so last year, looking at the prospect of the law coming up, there was a renewed effort. to find out how many law-abiding americans are getting swept up in these searches. in april 2016 bipartisan letter from the house judiciary committee asked the director of national intelligence for a public estimate of the number of communications of transactions involving united states persons are colle

we have to calculate scientifically. but before calculations comes celebrations.h brexit is only one. more now on the news about donald trump's health—care bill being withdrawn the last minute after failing to get enough support to pass in congress. house speaker paul ryan said he and the president agreed to pull the vote after it became apparent it would not get the minimum of 215 votes that it needed. let's cross to new york and speak to the republican strategist and former special assistant to george w bush, ron christie. thank you for us. nancy pelosi says the drug administration so pelosi says the drug administration so far has no record of accomplishment. how much of a setback is this? —— president trump's administration. it is a setback. the president said he wa nted setback. the president said he wanted a repeal their affordable health care act, paul ryan had seven yea rs health care act, paul ryan had seven years to get his act together to find a way to put legislation on the floor which could pass and go to the president, and today the failed. so in the

i think the president is making political calculation, which is, does he want this republican party onis arm or not? to him, the congressional republicans are like a or mightd who might not be interesting to him. too colorful -- >> not for pbs. it's a late-night show. words, foro in other trump, he views the republicans, and this generation of the as basicallyrty, disposable. that's what i don't think the republicans in congress or the republican base that got behind trump ever really understood. it reminds me, ironically, of he -- swairgz, which is schwarzenegger, which is he will comfortable governing as a conservative as he would be as a populist. >> you said something that resonates, when you talked about he's tweeting republicans as disposable. i think there's another way of aoking at it, which is for lot of republican primary voters, they feel as though traditional republicans were as disposable and that trump came along and actually spoke to them, spoke up interests and pledged to defend them. i think that is a big problem, anause paul ryan has imperative that's an intra-republi

>> i don't know how much he calculate. but it's ludicrous to think that obama went to the fbi, got a fisa warrant, fisa court agreed to tap donald trump's phone. first of all, there's no probable cause to ask for it. the fbi would go into full revolt. this would have been leaked. there would be a record of it. which the president could get right now. so it's ludicrous, and i think he's under a lot of pressure, under this russian, this russian thing which we still don't know what it is. and he's striking out against obama. to say his phones were tapped, you know, i would bet the ranch on it, they weren't. it's impossible. getting a fisa warrant is extremely difficult on a presidential candidate -- no way. i think he's lashing out. as he has been for so long. >> and betsy, he's not only saying that his phone was tapped, but also that the former president was responsible for it. i mean if this was true this would be a megascandal. an affair with watergate -- we still haven't heard from the white house. it's been nearly 12 hou