i think caleb feels more confident when he's with eddie for sure. >> and now caleb and ed reready to start summer school. >>> it was a gorgeous day outside today. i was outside with my kids and some friends selling lemonade, it was so nice outside. >> did you bring us any? >> no. 50 cents. >> all right. i'll pay up after the show. yeah. it's already friday, you know. following monday, a couple days this week, all the hot weather at the start of the week seemed confusing because it was the hottest weather we've had in eight months. let's look at this temperature change. gilroy had 95 on wednesday. today, just 72, the almadden valley, 94, today, 85. today temperatures in walnut creek in the upper 70s. we've dropped about 10 to 15 degrees widespread across the bay area. notice the bay side communities along the coastline quite a bit cooler today with the onshore flow. only 65 in oakland, 68 in hayward. still holding on to warmth for those of you in the east bay throughout livermore, danville, alamo, also walnut creek. close to 80 right now. so as we head throughout the morning hours, we

. >> the man is 31-year-old caleb hill, who has special needs.dangling from atop the ferris wheel. >> apparently the ride had been going and it stopped because they were at the point where they were letting people off so they could let more people on. >> and only five feet tall, hill is able to work his way beneath the safety bar and out of the car. >> we don't know why he left the car. some people said caleb was scared. his relatives said that he just didn't like sitting still. he was outside of the car hanging on. his care taker was hanging on with every ounce of strength she could to make sure he didn't fall. >> but the care taker is losing her grip. >> she really had a battle because it was a hot day. i'm sure he was probably sweaty. they were in the sun. and he had all kinds of sunscreen on so she was doing whatever she could to hold on to his arm and keep him from falling off of that car. >> as each second ticks by, caleb slips lower and lower. suddenly, she can hold him no more. the crowd gasps as the care taker loses her grip and caleb pl

churches about the biblical significance of the land, caleb and joshua is with the land, i spoke with them about their mission. >> let me ask you guy, most 20 year-old guys are trying to finish school, play video games but you're farmers in one of the most hotly contested pieces of real estate in the world. you know, what are you doing there? >> yeah, it is a different thing, you can say that much, but it's an awesome privilege to be there in this area that god all throughout the bible says, you have abraham, isaac and david, the stranger's coming and being farmers there. >> you're touring america right now raising awareness of the biblical significance of the west bank. what is your main message to the churches as you speak about israel? >> if you look at israel, you hear west bank a lot in the media, you hear that it's a word that's been throwing around, we're trying to educate the people, that 80% of your bible is written in this area, when you here our president say 367 borders, that means gives up all of old jerusalem, basically he would use a mask to say east jerusalem or if you

caleb is a bouvier.e people like caleb's owner bring their dogs in to be train but most of the students are muttates he rescues from shelters. >> mix is a beginner. >> reporter: this is a salt shaker full of live bed bugs. >> we purchase them. they're $3 apiece. >> reporter: he starts by just trying to get next... the dog to distinguish it from other smells and to give it a good sniff. >> good girl. >> reporter: we thought we'd show you what bed bug hunting looks like from a dog's point of view. with our own bed bug cam. >> good sniff. good sniff. good girl. >> reporter: now i'm sure you're wondering where does bill get his live bed bugs? they're overnighted from new york. where else? and if you're not totally grossed out already, listen to this from jody gangloff-kaufman. >> i think it's conceiveable that at some point everyone that you know will have dealt with them in one way or another. >> reporter: all of us? >> i think it's conceiveable. we really haven't stop them or slowed them yet. >> reporter:

take back independence day campaign asked people to join us in wearing black instead of celebrating caleb glover comments on facebook susan you have the right to pay taxes if you give up that right you'll be put in prison and any taxes will be used against you and you will also it will also be used to bombs out of other countries you have the right to a blood sucking attorney we know you cannot afford an attorney because you pay taxes so big brother will provide one for you and we will call it fair well said from facebook on a segment on fluoride by liquid ascii linda rabbit writes. your show tonight relieved years of guilt i slept off of giving my newborn son fluoride drops i was gone twenty seven years ago now i am glad i did it on facebook regarding our segment titled protests erupt in china in greece when is it the u.s.a.'s turn rus so verisign writes we don't write over silly things like unemployment and oppression we save our energy for important things like sports championships speaking of which i just changed my profile picture to this now this is from the hockey riots in canada a

texture list, and original interpretation of the supremacy clause that arose in a law review article by caleb nelson of the university of virginia. it was left to justice sotomayor to reject the move toward a more original list understanding of the supremacy clause. i think it is an important sense in which the roberts court is a pro-preemption court. but the jury is still out. justice kennedy did not join this part of the agreement, but did join opinions in which a presumption against pre-emption makes no appearance. the last question i want to talk about briefly is why this matters. if this is a pro-preemption court, is there cause for concern from a federalist perspective? i think the answer is yes. i am relying on the scholarship of my colleagues at duke, ernie young. he says if you care about federalism you ought to care about preemption. we live in a world of very broad congressional power when it comes to the commerce clause under article 1, section 8. if you look at these cases together, there is significant congressional power. i do not see that changing soon. but pre-emption cases h

. >> please, i'd like to take a moment to quickly say, thank you to caleb. and, obviously, for what he is doing being on the line for all of us, but additionally for bringing his brain to war and having the integrity to try to participate in this symposium. for our benefit to hear one of the ground-level frustrations of corruption, among others, that i heard. and additionally, to be there to try to foster the sort of thought process, is this something we can do. i want to bring up something specific about the corruption, and also falling on the needs of the food, water, judicial system, policing, none of which sounds like soldiers jobs. and think back to the past two decades, jack, you may be able to comment on this as an outsider i felt i was witnessing a pillaging of state department budget. and perhaps a loss of reliance on what used to be called soft power and probably is better described as public diplomacy. now, i would suggest that one of the solutions for the frustration of the corruption would be the carrot and stick in judicial rewarding of the car

texture list, and original interpretation of the supremacy clause that arose in a law review article by caleb nelson of the university of virginia. it was left to justice sotomayor to reject the move toward a more original list understanding of the supremacy clause. i think it is an important sense in which the roberts court is a pro-preemption court. but the jury is still out. justice kennedy did not join thisart of the agreeme, but did join opinions in which a presumption against pre-emption makes no appearance. the last question i want to talk about briefly is why this matters. if this is a pro-preemption court, is there cause for concern from a federalist perspective? i think the answer is yes. i am relying on the scholarship of my colleagues at duke, ernie young. he says if you care about federalism you ought to care about preemption. we live in a world of very broad congressional power when it comes to the commerc clause under article 1, section 8. if you look at these cases together, there is significant congressional power. i do not see that changing soon. but pre-emption cases have b