sopko were you aware a list of americans in afghan allies were given to the caliban? >> i'm only aware from what has been reported in the press. again we did not look at the withdrawal i cannot answer that question. >> i have a lot of concern about that. this is for the state department you do not need to respond or do think the state department does need to respond on this question. can they account for these people? it was characterized in that media by anonymous sources within the state department i was tantamount to giving the caliban a kill list. were there any american soldiers. >> again as i testified congressman following the withdrawal. >> yes or no for. >> do you know mr. sopko? >> no i don't brickwork do any of you know? in the weeks following the withdrawal whether or not there were american service members who were still there? i made you talk to someone else. didn't when you encounter with the state department exhibited any level of animosity of negative feelings towards american servicemen or women, contractors afghan allies? did you in your efforts to

up to one end of the stadium, and to a high mound and says, "let's have a go at this "piece — it's caliban single human voice "at the beginning of this ceremony." and so, we did it. and i was looking at this packed auditorium and, we finished and he said, "that's great". isaid, "well, ok, thanks, danny. "well, i'll do this. "where will the autocue be?" he said, "oh, there won't be an autocue". isaid, "no, no, no — i don't think you follow me. "no, i mean, where would i be able to look at the lines "if i had some sort of brain fudge? "and i needed to keep going." he said, "well, there won't be anywhere because we'd see it". isaid, "but, ijust want to check something, "danny. "so, there's a billion people watching this live, right?" he said, "yeah". i said, "so ijust, you know, things can happen. "i just don't want to let you down. "and if there's a billion people watching, it would be "visible if i messed up without a safety net". and he looked at me for a while, sort of slightly uncomprehendingly and then, said, "you'll be all right". that's — i'm going to take that with me. "you'll be all

yet the murderous caliban has them and also in the report says the three agencies did not provide or were unable to provide sigar information find the amount of on budget assistant funds they left in the country. at the time of the taliban take out so they just not complying or are they providing you with this information regarding 57.6 million that goes to dod ma'am, state and mama usaid, what say you? >> a couple things thank you for the question. the first of all we have not experienced the lack of cooperation in getting information from the department. with regard to the important question you ask about equipment those left behind, i believe the department and its submissions to the hill have estimated $7.12 billion worth of equipment that was in the hands of the afghan military when it collapsed. they have indicated much of that may not still be in operation. mr. sopko talked doing similar work for quick so you're saying they're cooperative with you but not the special inspector general in afghanistan there fully cooperative with you? should he be coming to you for the informati