editorial director of public affairs and he is talking to the author, a linguist at university of california berkeley, they came up with the idea together. so clive edited the book and we have jeff if he would write the introduction. jeff has written several books, public affairs, here's a comment there, he seemed to have the right touch for it. >> let's take a page and see what we find and you can explain it to was. as i lay and dad and dying? >> there were a lot of zombie contributions. and a lot of contributions from certain authors. i don't know if i have got that right in front of me, but i know we had some people who had that information. do you have the sheet of the most people title? >> i do not. >> what are you working on? with you working on? >> i'm working on the digital audio edition. so i am waiting for a final audiophile from michigan, from our audio studio and i will do that right here in the booth with head phones and once i'm ok with the model of low demand that our vendors know that hon. music is in overdrive, then they can put their files on their sites and we will have an audio ed

i'd like to put on the record no objection of a letter from the university of california berkeley, dr. dan cammond, a letter describing the reason and the appropriateness of expanding new transmission lines. if i can put that into the record? >> without objection, it will be included. >> chairman wellinghov, i wanted you to expand your thoughts on how ferc could implement, if it does receive back-stop citing approval. how it could implement a greenhouse gas performance interconnection standard for new transmission. and/or some criteria associated with compliance or fulfillment of the nation's renewable energy goals. several other witnesses made reference to something of that nature. could you tell us how you think that could work, even though we've heard the physical explanation that an electron is an electron, is an electron. how could this function? >> thank you, congressman ensle. we would initiate role-making, as part of that, all stakeholders would have an opportunity to provide any proposals as to how to implement such a greenhouse gas performance standard. in doing so, there's

during a 2003 speech at the university of california at berkeley, mr. koh said -- and i quote -- "when i came to government, the first conclusion i reached was that the rule of law should be on the u.s.'s side. that's a system of law" -- he's speaking of international law -- "that we helped to create. that's why we support various systems of international adjudication. that's why we support the u.n. system. we need these institutions even if they cut our own sovereignty a little bit." mr. koh's views on the first amendment again portray a desire to make american law subservient to international law. in his stanford law review article, the title which was on american exceptionalism, koh stated that our first amendment gives -- and i'm quoting now -- protections for speech and religion far greater emphasis and judicial protection in america than in europe or asia. and he opined -- and again i'm quoting -- that america's "exceptional free speech from tradition can cause problems abroad." furthermore, he stated that the way for the sphrok moderate these con

america was inapt and i talk about in the book where ron dellums, the liberal liberal from berkeley, california actually came up to me and said, but i don't understand, why is it all you cats with energy, you are all conservatives. back in my day you would have been on my side. i thought about and and i said, you know, when you think of the republican party you think of vietnam, you think of watergate, uc conservatives as opponents to civil-rights, i understand that. and i grew up in your time perhaps i would have been a liberal teaching in berkeley and when i think of democrats i think of jimmy carter, the iranian hostage crisis, malaise, why the hell would i want to be a democrat? of course, reagan came in and there are a lot of us -- i mean, i've played in bands with guys with. down to their belts who smokes pot as much as i drank milk and in these guys like to bring in. it was because at that time we will end one day from jimmy carter became president and the american not being able to do anything with the iranian hostage crisis to the next day ronald reagan being sworn in in the eye radian

he is from uc davis and i spent so much time at berkeley and a northern california. knew him very well. five years ago that and decided we really want to write a book like this. and we did. and like i said got to gather very few times actually wrote this all virtually, basically. on the computer back and forth back and forth. and he now is on the california resources board where he is able to really help regulate these policies in california which we both argue there's a chapter on california in the book, it is head of the game in terms of pushing innovation. certainly california is ahead of the u.s. in terms of thinking ahead. the u.s. has been much slower as a nation, compared to definitely all of the western european nations, much slower to innovate a much lower than california's. >> and forward by governor schwarzenegger. >> yes! what does he say. >> governor schwarzenegger has been, it's nice to get a bipartisan message. for many years we talked about the environment and the economy not be in battling. they are not peaked against each other. it's a good thing. f