and in the california welfare and institutions code, 5270, authorizes the 30 day extension of the 14 day hold, for an additional treatment without the need of a court ordered temporary conserver ship for a total of 47 days, and first the three and the 14 and the following 30, and enacting the code rkts 5270, the legislature intended to reduce the number of gravely disabled persons for whom the petitions are filed and who are placed under the supervision, simply to obtain, the additional period of treatment, the majority of patients who are placed under a temporary conserver ship have it dropped in 40 days, the use of the hold allows the clients to have a thorough investigation to regulate the medication and achieve stabilization and the skill set needed to return to the community, the use of the hold, serves the needs and allows the patient to avoid the stigma and the limitations of the conserve ter ship and anyone for the 30 days is entitled to a review hearing, within four days of that determination, and conducted by a court appointed commissioner or a certification review hearing

authorize the use of an additional thirty-day involuntary psychiatric hold, as permitted under california welfarens 5270.10-5270.65, and making a finding that this authorization will not result in increased costs to the city or in the reduction of current services. >> and good morning, i am from the department of aging and adult services and public unit. and we are here to talk about the 5270 hold. and currently, the welfare, and institutions code, 5150 allows the people to be put in involuntariary holds if they are endanger to themself or others. at the end of that hold, that emergency may be detained under a 5270 code for an additional 14 days of treatment, and which requires that two treating mental health profon

code to authorize the use of [speaker not understood] psychiatric hold permitted under the california welfare and institutions code. >> i do understand there might be a couple of amendments to this. is the represent from the san francisco d.a.'s office here? >> good afternoon, supervisors. katie miller from the san francisco d.a.'s office. i'm the chief of alternative programs. we actually don't have any amendments that we'd like to put forward. we do support the legislation at this time. the one concern that we had raised was that we have the resource he we need to staff these proceedings once they go forward. we want to be a part of them and we want to be able to staff them right so we started a discussion with our city partners and the mayor's office to that end. but we have no amendments at this time. thank you very much. >> thank you. i know there might be a technical amendment by the city attorney. >> deputy city attorney jon givner. i've distributed set of amendments that basically make a numbering change effectively to line this ordinance up with the [speaker not understood] ordinance

in california, you know, the welfare and education and the food stamps and jobs, still blue collar jobs. they are all gone now, so we were able to move, make many gains in welfare, education, jobs, but -- but the other thing we faced was the repression, the counterintelligence program, the disruptions, people were killed, assassinate, forced to flee. hi to leave the country for seven years. i was on the run for seven years, and then the -- so then -- the system -- you remember the other thing the war on poverty program that a lot of people had jobs, and they were giving us all this money to keep us working and keep us from organizing, you know, because a lot of people got all these jobs and war on poverty and people running proposals and getting grants. man, you know, like -- so, you know, i -- anyway, we had some gains, but then we went back, right? >> that's certainly like part of the strategy behind, you know, rockefeller/ford foundations is to provide money but for very particular -- for how they saw -- you know, they wanted to channel that energy in a particular way. >> we have a q

poverty in california, 24% of the population lives below the poverty line, an extraordinary thing to happen and they continue to win. the left continues to win. >> 30% of the nation's welfare california. there will be a referendum on the plastic bag ben. it will be on the ballot again in 2016 but the reality is these incremental steps towards regulation again and again in the economy are not being seen the ways they should be seen. there is a disconnected among voters with these environmental rules and the brown administration's regulation, that will become apparent over time. eventually these voters have to see the rampant poverty the high taxes and overregulation are causing terrible problems to our economy. we have a drought in california. stuart: hold on a second. as a californian i can't give up. we had some very bad decisions. we had governor schwarzenegger had a wonderful opportunity to change the state when he came in and he didn't and the reason he didn't, the deal made with the california teachers' unions. unions have tremendous political power in this state. over the course of the last 20 years, half a billion dollars on politics, they control the state, they co

in california, you know, the welfare and education and the food stamps and jobs, still blue collar jobs. they are all gone now, so we were able to move, make many gains in welfare, education, jobs, but -- but the other thing we faced was the repression, the counterintelligence program, the disruptions, people were killed, assassinate, forced to flee. hi to leave the country for seven years. i was on the run for seven years, and then the -- so then -- the system -- you remember the other thing the war on poverty program that a lot of people had jobs, and they were giving us all this money to keep us working and keep us from organizing, you know, because a lot of people got all these jobs and war on poverty and people running proposals and getting grants. man, you know, like -- so, you know, i -- anyway, we had some gains, but then we went back, right? >> that's certainly like part of the strategy behind, you know, rockefeller/ford foundations is to provide money but for very particular -- for how they saw -- you know, they wanted to channel that energy in a particular way. >> we have a q

issue of workers, is that, when we did a study in california, in 1985, to see how it would work to get illegal aliens, out of the field and, folks on welfare, and we found f that the comparison, of somebods on, receiving benefits, and somebody out there working was almost the same. they're not dumb, why get outut there, in the sun, and you can l get welfare. >>> okay, the poiments is, thati we have these children, that are in the schools. and these are kids that have grown uper here, and they've goe through the adversity, to complete their education. and a lot of them, are working,p and a lot of them are community leaders, and so, what gets twisted, about 1403 it's about taking someone's seat in that c classroom.so and, 1403 is on finance. they have gone through admission, and they've beenents accepted.n and 1403 is whether they payey'r instate or out-of-state. so these are texas residents,. >>> you b asked me to complete. >>> they're illegal.o co [applause] >>> so, the argument that weear hear about repealing it, is they are taking things away fromrgum students, and that's an admission issue.in >>> so, these are students that are paying a

welfare office? >>> yes, i do. i know where there's work. >> right now i'm -- i can't. because i'm going to have to file for disability. ♪ >> here in california's valley agriculture is worth $50 billion a year. this farmer tells me he needs imported laborers. the americans he's hired he says are bums. there is legislation in washington to fix the farm worker problem but that legislation is dying. from cowards. >> americans won't do that type of work. that work is just out of their cards. they just won't do it. we have import people to do our work and this is the biggest agricultural valley in the world. we need help. >> i mean i could use work but i'm not -- i can't go to work just yet. >>> it would mess up your disability -- >> disability and welfare, yes. ♪ >> reporter: and there you go. modern america. something for nothing. let them eat grapes. you looking for work? you're not doing anything. complaining. you get $9 plus an hour plus a bonus. ton of grapes a day. always looking for work. >> so what drives illegal immigration? big factor obviously is money. colonel the minimum wage in california, $360 week and in mexico 26 bucks a week. >>>

california restaurant owners. foie gras, which translates in french into fatty liver, is made from the enlarged liver of a duck, which is force fed, a practice which raised opposition from animal welfare groups. so the ban, which has been in place since 2012, stays in place. >>> about 10,000 californians tonight are on the verge of losing their health insurance, because they have not verified their immigration status. cover california says it will send out pre-termination letters. since the affordable care acts only covered legal residents, applicants are required to provide birth certificates, passports, or legal residency cards. another 6,000 cases are under review. >>> hillary clinton today, bruno mars tonight. the sales force conference in san francisco is creating quite the buzz. the former secretary of state was the keynote speaker at the week-long dream force software conference. mrs. clinton's main focus was philanthropy and the community. she discussed taking advantage of new technology to help improve the educational development of kids from all walks of life. >> with the goal of using the latest brain science to encourage more parents to talk, read, and sing to their infant

issue of workers is when we did a study in california and 1985, to see how it would work to get illegal aliens out of the field and into, and folks that were on welfare out to work we found that the comparison of somebody receiving benefits to somebody out there working was almost the same. they are not. why get out there in the sun when you can be in the welfare business. >> the point is we have these children that are in our schools and in our neighborhoods and these are kids that have grown up here. they have gone through the universities that it has taken to complete their education. a lot of them are working to support their families while they are going for high school. a lot of them are valedictorians community leaders so what gets twisted with the argument about 1403 is that it's about taking someone's seat in that classroom. 1403 is strictly on finance. they have arctic on to the admission process through their own volition do their own achievement and they have already then accepted. 1403 is about whether they will pay in-state tuition or outs of state tuition. you asked me to complete. >> they are illegal. [applause] >> the argument that w