and is currently at caltech, received his nobel prize 1975, probing the mysteries of reverse transcriptin and rna and dna interact. dr. philip sharpe, now an integral part of m.i.t., was probing the fact that dna had segments that did not in fact translating the gene expression and began to understand the diversity of how so many genes used so if you proteins and how that coating -- coding of rna has led to other ventures you will hear about. he received his nobel prize in 1993. jim, a fellow texan, got his phd at the university of texas, was employed in california at sloan-kettering, where he has been unraveling the mysteries of the immune system and how that has altered the chains of our lives in profound ways, for which he received the nobel prize in 2018. we are privileged to have the three of them to share their journey and insight. i will begin by asking them each briefly to comment on this revolution of science that they have been part of, and particularly how they think the national cancer act of 1971 and the impact that's had may have come -- have contributed to or accelerated th

i get stuck in some, you know, a gronomy plays a lot but i love caltech i do. i'm kind of morphed into, it's more like agricaltech put them together, okay? and we've got an issue with energy out there and that gas was high when it was over $6 we were starting to hear stories about maybe a shortage of fertilizer, now, that's a weird story, but it's true, and that's something so i looked at say mosaics these are fertilizer companies, mosaic, mos, or ntr , yes, they have rallied on the back of that story quietly, but if some of these fears really do play out next spring, these things could be really hot and nobody is looking at them per se as far as the broad market that's why i like them so again it's caltech but it's agri caltech and something that we have to use and its already gone up in price, yes i'll grant you that as far as your emeralds and rubies but if this does play out, if it does play out, these will have room to run. liz: i'm a diamond girl myself. by the way your mosaic shares are up 4% right now. scott fullman, scott shellady, thank you both very

i like to think of it as a good physics school but caltech is the genuine mothership. in short, steve is a scientist of some consequence. he's not a dilettante. we're going to talk about his book. if you're joining us you know why we're talking about the book. it's titled "unsettled: what climate science tells us, what it doesn't, and why it matters." s published on the circuit i know what that's like. it can be annoying but if you write a book it's a lot of work and you hope people will read it. there's this issue of talking about science in the public space and changing civilizations energy. in full disclosure i reviewed the book and i hadn't known him before. i thought i would like him when i read the book but i reviewed it for "the wall street journal" very favorably. it was good i guess you could say publicity helps people focus on why the book was written. humanity has known that there's been an atmosphere and scientists figured this out carbon dioxide was discovered 250 years ago and the scots invented everything i think. i'm not scottish, british, but they did

we'll be talking about that and prior to that, heio was a professor at caltech, i'll confess i'm jealoust's my first choice where wanted to go to school, i went to queens in canada, some of you know, i like to think of it as a good school but caltech is the mothership so in short, steve was a scientist, we're going to talk about his book. if you are joining us, you know why where talking about this, what climate scientists tell us, why it matters. steve was on the circuit, i know what that's like, it can be fun, it can be annoying but it's a lot of work. you help people will read it. we want to talk about the book, besides of the planet's climate, we are going to talk about them nature of debate, not just this debate but this issue of science in the public space and about the idea of changing civilizations energy and how we get energy, we need energy to survive, no energy, no life. full disclosure, i reviewedwe facebook, i've gotten to know him, i like him. i reviewed the book for the "wall street journal" favorably, it caused a bit of a flap which if you haven't followed, you can go to

and part a of that was professor and provost at caltech because that is my first choice right wanted to go to school i went university in canada so we will talk about his book if you're joining us you would know why were talking about the book unsettled. what climate science tells us and what it doesn't know what that's like that can be fun it's a lot of work so you hope people read it and not just this debate but the issue of science and in the public space and the idea of that i have gotten to know him i like him. they review the vote for the wall street journal in a student favorably. and so to see that was a cancellation. this is good. that helps you focus on why the book was written. and as a preamble then i should point out from the history it is an atmosphere over 400 years. and carbon dioxide was discovered 250 years ago. a scottish chemist discovered it and then 200 years ago almost exactly a couple years to the anniversary the idea of the greenhouse effect it was identified by a mathematician which was kind of fun it was like anybody as a mathematician. and he figured out i

uh... looks like he's coming to give his son a tour of caltech. he's hoping you guys can meet up. (scoffs) he would like that, wouldn't he? well, that is the gist of the e-mail. who's tam? he was my best friend in the whole world growing up.

. - what is caltech? yes. whirled menu for $200.

i think i love mega cap stocks in regards to caltech i like housing, commodities prices coming down,housing sector and then low beta. there's great low beta etf's investors can get into and next year, we plan to add utilities and gold. we don't have it now but we're adding those things that again we think will holdup well in a slow growing environment that's going to be decelerating next year. charles: so i should point out that utilities coming into the day was the best performing defense sector it's the number one sector so far in this session as well. on the homebuilding side do you like individual home builders? >> that as well as reit. i think you can get nice cash flow and again i think the setup for the real estate sector is very strong. the supply demand dynamics are still extremely extremely strong for this sector so it holds up well next year at least the first half. charles: ten seconds. is the worst over? i mean, it does sound like obviously this market will bump along which you're worried about but is the worst over? is this for 2021? >> the worst is not over yet, charle

i like to think of it as a good physics score but caltech the mothership so in short, steve is a scientistnce. if you're joining us, you know why we are talking about the book entitled unsettle, what climate scientist tell us. why it matters. this could be fun, it can be annoying but you write a book, it's a lot of work so you hope people will read it. we're going to talk about the book, the size of the planet's climate, we will talk about the nature of debate, not just this debate but talking about signs in the public space and we will talk about the idea of changing civilizations energy, how we get energy, we need energy to survive, no energy, no life. full disclosure, i reviewed facebook, got to know him and i like him, i thought i'd like him when i write the book but a reviewor favorably, it caused a flap written and as a preamble, i should say some history here, humanity has known the atmosphere for about 400 years scientists figure this out a while ago. carbon dioxide was discovered about 250 years ago, i think scottish person discovered it, stopped invented everything i think about

were talking about $6 trillion of market capital innovation in silicon valley and caltech, usc, berkeley, ucla, stanford. all the universities in the spinoff, it's all on the coast and a lot of those people are very wealthy in their insulated from the ramification of their own ideology predate putting kids and proof legal schools and their very prounion and against the charter school. they depend on 27 cents of a kilowatt and 65 year-round and they were hundred eight in august. i think a lot of people are waking up to that. i think you're going to see things that nobody would believe in the next ten years in california. a real diversity of political opinion that we don't have. >> victor davis hanson, and your book the case for trump you refer to progressives as a monolithic rainbow coalition, what is that? >> what i mean by that, if i were to go to most universities and i would say in class. if i was asked, i wouldn't go off topic, if i was asked in an interview where people knew my opinion and i were to say i don't like racially segregateds safe spaces or i don't think young people shou

we are talking mostly about the $6 trillion of the market capitalization in silicon valley and caltech, usc, berkeley, la, stanford and the spinoff industries finance. it's all on the coast and a lot of those people are very wealthy and kind of insulated on the ramifications of their own ideologies they tend to put their kids in prep school or parochial school and they are very prounion and against charter schools or they don't believe in water transfers, the lifeblood of the valley, but they are dependent on hedging or they don't mind 27 cents a kilowatt because the climate 65 to 75 is not like it is here so a lot of people are waking up to that a real diversity of political opinion that we don't have now. >> host: victor davis hanson in your book, "the case of trump," you refer to them as a monolithic rainbow coalition. what does that mean? >> guest: what, i mean, by that is if i were to go to most universities and i would say in class, if i were asked i wouldn't go off topic but if people knew my opinion and i were to say that i don't like racially segregated safe spaces really don'

grab might be a stock to watch today because that gets you caltech in southeast asia as opposed to chinatest variant and the world health organization says omicron detected now in 38 countries. david: oh, wow. thank y, tammy bruce who was caught in the middle of us talking here during this whole conversation. >> i'm laughing, like confused sometimes what the secretary was saying and i was demonstrating your very very i love that interview though it was good stuff. david: you're very calm to stay here during the whole thing. i'm expecting you to jump in. all right thank you both. >> thank you. david: now, this. omicron has been detected in at least five states now, including here in new york, officials are saying not to panic, but to stay cautious, we've got a doctor on the case, coming right up. and did you hear this , president biden jokes that he isn't in charge at the white house, roll tape. >> i've seen more, [laughter] of dr. fauci than i have my wife , we kid each other, but look, whose president? fauci. david: yeah, some critics say that's not a joke. it's a nightmare. a new poll