cases, to get a quorum, six out of six, and every case they failed to find a violation that miss calvillo presented that failed to find conflicting information was a case like this, where i got five out of six or six out of seven votes, so his calvillo was dishonest, and you took it just hook, link and sinker. now, i'm telling you every board has put these 150 word summaries in their minutes. last month, you gave her permission to not do that. based on what, i don't know. she's never discussed it before the board. >> any further public comment on the minutes? all right. we have a motion. it's been seconded. all in favor of approving the minutes, please say aye. the minutes are approved unanimously. what we're going to do next in deference of supervisor kim who has joined us is take a matter out of order, and that is we're going to go to agenda item 8, and we're going to take item 8ha2 -- 2aii. >> i'm sorry, agenda item 2, ii, which is

i think we had some communications with miss calvillo. >> yes, chair, thank you. she called miss pelham earlier today to apologize she wouldn't be able to make it tonight. that's our fault, we notified her as a courtesy late. the regular agenda went out on time but didn't send her the courtesy notification. she was okay with us proceeding without her and directed us to rely on the letter she submitted to the commission which appears on page 63 of the packet. >> were you trying to prevent her from appearing? >> no. >> mr. chairman -- >> commissioner kopp -- >> through the chair to mr. chen, there was distributed this may 18, 2012 memorandum all city departments from the sunshine ordinance task force, it refers to the office of the city attorney in this way task force disagrees with the office of the city attorney's interpretation for requirements of summaries and meeting minutes. have you you being the office, issued a written opinion on the subject matter? >> our advice on this issue is contained in the good government guide which is referenced. >> does the brown

calvillo can't do her job because the law says she has to do this or cannot do that and including the 150 word summary in the minutes would keep her from doing that or would be somehow endemic to her performing her duties. now, i have a hard time believing that after eight years if the city attorney can find one legal justification for denying the placement of the 150-word summaries in the body of the minutes, his office would have come up with it and with 200 lawyers i have a hard time believing they don't have either the time or the legal knowledge to do so. i'm a retired veteran living on a fixed income. 90% of my income goes to pay my rent and i live on the other 10%. the fact that i am not able to afford to go to the superior court is one issue. and the second issue is i have to exhaust all local remedies. basically this is exhausting all local remedies. i fail to see and understand why you seem to be refusing to look at the simple fact that over the years every single board or commission with the exception of ms. valvillo representing and acting as the representative of the boar