>> commissioner pollock: miss calvillo, i have a question. in regards to the place holder for the 297,000, could you tell me when we must make a decision on the return of the items? could we approve a budget at our next meeting for the 297 and have a contingency. >> through the chair to commissioner pollock, the answer is yes, i will not have to go back to the board of supervisors budget committee until june, so which is why generally it isn't -- the previous executive officer is here, jason freed. i think you determined your budget during the month of may, so you have some time. >> commissioner pollock: and then -- i mean, my goal or hope is that we will have staff in place to look at our drk-at our plans going forward in terms of creating a more robust budget and i would assume that you would work with our staff to do that? i think my concern is just making sure that we have an idea of that before may? but if not, if you would be available to work with our chair to create a sample budget or a proposed budget? cal c >> commissioner calvillo:

i think commissioner pollock has a question, miss calvillo? >> commissioner pollock: miss calvillo, could i just have you represent again the estimated amount? you said 270,000? >> we are estimating if all costs remain the same, are estimating 273,000 would be the total lafco expenditures for the next fiscal year if all costs remain the same. >> supervisor fewer: thank you. thank you very much. >> sure. >> supervisor fewer: so i presented commissioners with a -- copies of the current year budget that we approved last year. i believe that in june of 2017, we approved a budget of 297,242, and while reserving the right in future years to the full set amount, we held onto 192,000 for the current fiscal year, and rereturned the remaining amount to the city council. colleagues, is there a proposal on how to proceed? anyone? yes. commissioner pollock? >> commissioner pollock: thank you so much. i think in light of our administrative officer's report on a proposed -- or not a proposed, but rather the estimated amount for fiscal year 2017 and 2018, i w

i make a motion. >> commissioner calvillo: always good practice. >> supervisor fewer: yeah. make a motion that the next meeting of this lafco body has a hearing conducts a hearing on the community benefits packages with hospitals, and then, also an update on public broad band. great, and if we can take that without objection. thank you very much. >> clerk: you need a second. >> supervisor fewer: oh second yes. commissioner ronen, thank you very much. >> supervisor fewer: so i see that mr. hyams is here, and let's go back to item number four. do we need to call that again. >> clerk: just for the public. item three is a community choice aggregation activities report. >> supervisor fewer: oh, item number four sorry. thank you. >> so sorry. my serious apologies. got a little crossed up on the timing of the meeting today. >> supervisor ronen: so did i if that makes you feel better. >> well thank you. thanks for your understanding. we definitely had it on our schedule but just not at the right time. but thampgs to the phone call that i received i was able to get over here before t

miss calvillo. >> thank you, chair. so at the direction of lafco our office issued an rfq for executive officer services. the deadline was extended to february 13th, 2018. the anticipated not to exceed contract raid is $75 an hour. the panel deliberation was scheduled for this morning, and we will issue a notice of intent to prequalify, we're hoping by february 27th. at this time, the details of the respondents are confidential in accordance with the administrative code chapter 67.24 for mr. brooks, but may be subject to disclosure once the panel scoring and the issue of the notice of intent to prequalify has completed. respondents are not gasuarante a contract if they meet the qualifications because it is on lafco for the qualification and certainly as the chair as she was authorized to conduct this r 23 q process, and the respondent's ability to complete the necessary administrative requirements in order to become an approved city vendor through the general services agency. respondents who are prequalified will remain

>> chair fewer, members of the commission, angela calvillo, the interim officer. >> miss calvillo, sot, because this does pertain to my application, i would just like to excuse myself from the room. >> supervisor fewer: oh, yes. >> as you know, commissioners, cynthia pollock remains in seat six as you know she may do so until another commissioner is appointed or she is reappointed. now commissioner shanti singh was appointed to the alternate seat to lafco. welcome, commissioner singh. the commissioner was able to participate in commissioner business, and with commissioner singh, we have the necessary quorum to consider item three. given that commissioner pollock has already recused herself and left the room, anthothose conc my remarks. >> supervisor fewer: thank you very much. let's open this up to public comment. are there any members of the public who wish to comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i make a motion to excuse commissioner pollock. >> great. that was made by commissioner ronen, seconded by commissioner singh. we can take that without objection,

. >> commissioner calvillo: so if we are aware of what our projects are, then, there would need to be some time taken with those projects to understand what the scope of services would actually be that would be expected to be provided. in the city and county of san francisco, rfp's can take up to 15 months. that being said, there are ways that we can try to speed up the process and certainly scopes of services that don't include handling all of the approval authorities that would necessitate 15 months. so it's really going to be conversations with your offices on what the expected scope would be for the prioritized projects. >> commissioner pollock: thank you so much. just answered my questions. >> supervisor fewer: colleagues in light of the items that we had at the retreat and workshops, there were some issues of concern to the the advocates, and one of those was private public partnerships. we've heard a lot about hospital services and also community benefits concerning hospitals and in the agreements. this is something that i'm very interested in, and i think it's within the scope

yes, miss calvillo? >> yes, thank you, miss stricker. the other point that i wanted to make is we had the city attorney's office review the terms of the assignment agreement, and they have signed off on all of the language. we're happy to provide that to you, as well, members of the commission, and that beginning march 1st, the assignment agreement will take place, and we will have all of the files transferred from the hyde, miller, owen and troste to the new renne law group. >> supervisor fewer: okay. colleagues, any questions, comments? okay. let's open this up to members of the public. are there any members of the public wishing to comment on item nine snoo seeing none, public comment is closed. do we have a motion to approve the contract for renne law group, llc. great. moved by commissioner ronen, seconded by commissioner pollock, so approve the contract for the renne law group, llc as our law group. madam clerk, can you please call item ten. >> item ten is public comment. >> supervisor fewer: this is the time for members of the pub