with the mercer family who owned cambridge analytica.any got the call from steve bannon, candidate trump says i want them here right now, so lewandowski wanted to use an intermediate company between the campaign and cambridge analytica to conceal the relationship. now, understand this, cambridge analytica was a uk company at the time. all of its key personnel were uk people. there are laws in the united states against using foreign nationals in decision making capacities in a campaign. so i'd say that is probably the most significant thing that she was privy to. >> let me read you this part from a profile in "elle" magazine that he pitched in a meeting at trump tower back in 2015. what was the pitch, was it -- is it a correct description to say that she was pitch position the trump campaign this information or that the trump campaign raeched out to her? shed light on how this relationship developed and what it was that she could offer the trump campaign that might be of interest. >> so to be completely accurate, i think that it was banno

account kogan estimates he obtained data from a staggering 30 million people which he shared with cambridge analyticabeen public knowledge had it not been for one of cambridge's former employees blowing the whistle in march 2016. >> i think it is really important for americans to know what this company has been doing with data and really important i think to find out was this data used to help elect donald trump. >> although there is no evidence that the facebook data did help elect president trump. his leaks made headlines around the world and exposed facebook to renewed criticism. >> they have not put in the kind of infrastructure necessary to actually protect consumer data. they have not done anything to actually vet the people who have been grabbing the stuff. >> there is so much data out there and facebook has no real way of clawing the information back. >> move fast and break things. he moved fast and broke the trust of the american people and the people around the world that are on the platform. >> exposed the fact that facebook's hold on our data was not secure and not being responsible with

remember, cambridge analytica is not a classic data breach.ich there was an and filtration by a threat actor and they reached can they got a whole bunch of personal information. that came later. the issue here is that the sharing of information with a third-party and not fully appreciating exactly what that gave cambridge analytica writes to. the issue for the ftc is whether or not facebook fully realized that by having users download the cambridge analytica app and use it to answer questions, whoever access to the questionnaire was getting information from their friends as well. the real issue is that they either knew what they were doing and failed to police it or were they monitoring their contractual policies and sharing information with third parties. that is what makes it so different. people had no idea. if i download this app and answer this question there, i am giving access to my friends information. that is what makes it particularly stand out as an issue. a data breach as a data breach. that is troublesome in and of itself. not hav

cambridge analytica was part of president trump's 2016 campaign but was shut down last year after itobtained data from tens of millions of facebook users. brittany kaiser, a former director for the firm, did allegedly cooperate with mueller's team. but her lawyer says the subpoena came quote "long ago."kaiser reportedly visited wikileaks founder julian assange, a few months after the election. (justine) and in world news -- iranian foreign minister javad zarif said u-s vice president mike pence's iran remarks in munich are "hateful" and "ignorant."that came during zarif's speech at the munich security conference today. <""yesterday, right here in munich, mr. pence repeated this farce when he arrogantly demanded that europe must join the us in undermining its own security and breaking its obligations."> vice obligations.">breaking its obligations."> vice president mike pence spoke on persuading german france and britain to follow washington in withdrawing from the deal and to "stop undermining u.s. sanctions." (jrstone) former new york congressman anthony weiner is out of federal pris

that's how cambridge analytica happened. this is a repeated problem. there's been one great author at university of north carolina who characterizes facebook as a 15-year apology tour because their strategy is to maintain a black box where we can't inspect what's going on, and just my point here is that these products are so important that we need to have these investigations, we need to recognize that -- >> there does need -- you raised some question s. you have no evidence, just spidey sense that they should change. and that you're operating on hypothesis and not real evidence. you've raised issues, there should be a conversation. >> they have political power that dominates in this country and around the world. they're not elected, and the whole point of "zucked" is to give you as a voter and a citizen of the united states an opportunity to understand the questions and the issues. >> all right. roger mcnamee. provocative title, too.

cambridge analytica was under very strict privacy laws which they broke. laws do not prevent crime, they only allow you to enforce. the notion that we had gdpr, you would not have cambridge analytica is false. only's point about gdpr been in effect for a few months, that is true. but for a decade or more, going all the way back to 2002 eu privacy law, europe has had a stricter regime than the u.s. looking at the scholarly evidence, unbiased, completely independent evidence, that has had a demonstrable and causal effect on the ability to make money for a startup, internet company and that has had a negative effect on innovation. i really wish california had not done what it did because there is such a pressure now. i wish we could wait for years because in four years, it will be crystal clear how much harm gdpr has done to the european digital economy. socannot really see it yet we will rush in and do something similar. this asi would look at three cars rolling down the highway in a race, china, europe and america. china, there is no governance, guidelines.

cambridge analytica was started by steve bannon. it was set up to be a full service propaganda machine. they they democracy is at riskt because of the targets of citizens with disinformation and dark ads from unidentifiable resources. and facebook in particular is unwilling to be actable to regul -- accountable to regulators around the world. in response to the report, they say they're open to meaningful regulation and support the committee's recommendation but we're not waiting. we made substantial changes so every political ad on facebook has to be authorized, state who is paying for it, and stored in a searchable archive for several years. joining me now is anna schefter. she interviewed the whistle-blower chris whily. this is, the uk report goes into two areas. privacy and privacy settings. but the other is the political focus. and a lot of experts increasingly now say privacy is one thing, but this targeting of ads should bother us. in this why we're having a reckoning with facebook in particular, and damien collins has been na

then came the cambridge analytica study.ber facebook announced a security flaw that allowed an unknow party to take over 50 million accounts. then facebook unveiled another flaw that let hackers see personal information of 14 million users. so mark zukckerberg roek at op-d saying they're a savior for small businesses. if you believe in a world where everyone gets an opportunity to use their voice and an equal chance to be heard, where anyone can start a business from catch, then it is important to build technology that serves everyone. that is the world we're building for every day and our business model makes it possible. there is a lot to dig into. she wrote a response to zuckerberg's piece called "mark zuckerberg, let me fix that op-ed you wrote." the response was claims that the company doesn't sell data. we don't sell people's data, duh. we monetize people's data ourselves and offer -- i can't really read that. very creative way of doing it. >> you stepped on my joke there, ali, but go ahead. i read the op-ed, but some

sam patten is also tied to cambridge analytica, which is the campaign data firm during the election around which there has been lots and lots of intrigue. we found out today that sam patten will finally be sentenced on april 12th. so a couple of months from now. a week in advance of that sentencing and the first week of april, we will get filings in his case that we expect to detail the extent of his cooperation with federal prosecutors, since he pled guilty last summer. given all of the different elements of the scandal that sam patten is potentially connected to, the inaugural, kilimnik, cambridge analytica, it's going to be fascinating to see what he's helped prosecutors with when he finally turns up in court and his case, which has been totally opaque to us the public thus far, gets laid out for the public, we will understand how he fits into this puzzle as well. so there's definitely still stuff that remains to be explained and that we will eventually learn as members of the public who are watching all of this stuff. there is definitely cases that aren't over, trials that haven't been

next, what was the precise role of cambridge analytica? committee has looked at the impact of the british data firm and has said its ceo misled them. finally, there's the kremlin question — to what extent, if any, did russia weaponise information during the brexit referendum, and why is there such a gulf between the government's warnings about security and the response of tech companies? facebook is taking disinformation more seriously and has appointed the charity full fact as its first independent fact—checkers in britain. one thing i'm aware of is it might not be facebook in ten years‘ time, or it might notjust be facebook. we're going to need to write rules through open, democratic, transparent processes that apply to all these companies. last year, facebook was fined the maximum £500,000 by the information commissioner for serious breaches in data protection law. have you seen satisfactory evidence that they've learned and changed? i am hopeful that we'll see more of that change and i... that suggests we haven't so far. i haven't so f

next, what was the precise role of cambridge analytica?ally, there's the kremlin question — to what extent, if any, did russia weaponise information during the brexit referendum, and why is there such a gulf between the government's warnings about security and the response of tech companies? facebook is taking disinformation more seriously and has appointed the charity full fact as its first independent fact—checkers in britain. one thing i'm aware of is it might not be facebook in ten years' time, or it might not just be facebook. we're going to need to write rules through open, democratic, transparent processes that apply to all these companies. last year, facebook was fined the maximum £500,000 by the information commissioner for serious breaches in data protection law. have you seen satisfactory evidence that they've learned and changed? i am hopeful that we'll see more of that change and i... that suggests we haven't so far. i haven't so far. i think it's yet to be seen. what do they need to do to comply with this regulatory regime wh

an investigation into facebook's privacy practices began last year following the cambridge analyticad amount to the largest penalty ever levied against a tech company in the u.s. >>> meanwhile, general electric is downsizing its world headquarters. the company has been restructuring its boston operations amid sagging profits. g.e. will also return $87 million massachusetts spent in an incentives package to lure the company there from connecticut three years ago. >>> and jpmorgan chase became the first u.s. bank to roll out itnnounced jpm coin, the digital token, used to instantly settle payments between clients. only a tiny fraction of payments will be made using the cryptocurrency. anne-marie? >> all right. that's really surprising to me. i thought after bitcoin lost so much of its value that was the beginning of the end for cryptocurrency, but clearly not when you have jamie dimon backing you up. >> it surprised me because in the past jamie diamond kind of poo-poo'd it. >> thanks. >> thank you. >>> ahead, surviving a mountain lion attack. a colorado man shares his story of how he h

next, what was the precise role of cambridge analytica?d them. finally, there's the kremlin question — to what extent, if any, did russia weaponise information during the brexit referendum, and why is there such a gulf between the government's warnings about security and the response of tech companies? facebook is taking disinformation more seriously and has appointed the charity full fact as its first independent fact—checkers in britain. one thing i'm aware of is, it might not be facebook in ten years' time, or it might notjust be facebook. we're going to need to write rules through open, democratic, transparent processes that apply to all these companies. last year, facebook was fined the maximum half a million pounds by the information commissioner for serious breaches in data protection law. have you seen satisfactory evidence that they've learned and changed? i am hopeful that we'll see more of that change. that suggests we haven't so far. i haven't so far. i think it's yet to be seen. what do they need to do to comply with this regu

next, what was the precise role of cambridge analytica?mittee has looked at the impact of the british data firm and has said its ceo misled them. finally, there's the kremlin question — to what extent, if any, did russia weaponise information during the brexit referendum, and why is there such a gulf between the government's warnings about security and the response of tech companies? facebook is taking disinformation more seriously and has appointed the charity full fact as its first independent fact—checkers in britain. one thing i'm aware of is it might not be facebook in ten years‘ time, or it might notjust be facebook. we're going to need to write rules through open, democratic, transparent processes that apply to all these companies. last year, facebook was fined the maximum £500,000 by the information commissioner for serious breaches in data protection law. have you seen satisfactory evidence that they've learned and changed? i am hopeful that we'll see more of that change and i... that suggests we haven't so far. i haven't so far.

cascade platinum. >>> cambridge analytica saying where is mark zuckerberg on all of this. >> we wereere trying to figure out what happened. >> it was march 2018 and i remember sitting across from mark zuckerberg and it just felt incredibly tense. >> as uncomfortable as it is for me to do a tv interview, i feel this is an important thing as a discipline for what we're doing, i should be out there and being asked hard questions. wh >> what happened? >> it was a major breech of trust, and i'm really sorry it happened. >> this was different. >> senator john thune and much of washington was watching closely. >> we're contemplating how to proceed in terms of our oversight role and we want to make sure we're holding them accountable. >> everybody wants you to show up, will you testify for congress? >> i'm happy to if it is the right thing to do. >> you're the brand and name of facebook, people want to hear from you? >> we just want to send whoever is best informed to do that. >> we took into consideration the statements he made, and then started to more aggressively pure sue the idea of him

next, what was the precise role of cambridge analytica?tish data firm and has said its ceo misled them. finally, there's the kremlin question — to what extent, if any, did russia weaponise information during the brexit referendum, and why is there such a gulf between the government's warnings about security and the response of tech companies? facebook is taking disinformation more seriously and has appointed the charity full fact as its first independent fact—checkers in britain. one thing i'm aware of is it might not be facebook in ten years' time, or it might notjust be facebook. we're going to need to write rules through open, democratic, transparent processes that apply to all these companies. last year, facebook was fined the maximum half a million pounds by the information commissioner for serious breaches in data protection law. have you seen satisfactory evidence that they've learned and changed? i am hopeful that we'll see more of that change. that suggests we haven't so far. i haven't so far. i think it's yet to be seen. what do

on the british data firm cambridge analytica that collapsed last year, there is evidence that the individualsme. the committee wants that and alleged russian interference formally investigated. rather than having a system where the tech companies just apologise when things go wrong and carry on repeating the same mistakes, we should have a proper statutory regulatory system which imposes standards on the tech companies with a regulator that can act against them if they fail to meet those standards. this system exists in broadcasting, it's common in other industries, and we need it in the tech sector as well. facebook say they have taken extensive measures to combat harmful content and make political adverts more transparent. we fundamentally changed as a company since the start of this inquiry. if you want to know where a company prioritises, you should look at where it invests, and we've invested a huge amount in people and technology to tackle the issues of online harm that this report raises. nearly two years in the making and weighing in at 108 pages, this report has done plenty of intell

has been investigating the cambridge analytica scandal for almost a year.treet investors ever asked mark zuckerberg about the ftc investigation, but they are happy to ask questions about european regulators, so this is a crisis of legitimacy. rather than doing anything, they come out with a new seating chart. i did ask the record, sheryl sandberg about the investigation and didn't get much of an answer. we report the ftc is preparing a record fine. david, what are the chances the sec takes action here and unwinds one of these previous and already completed acquisitions? david: based on the agency's check record and not just the ftc, but the doj, that's would be radical. , which they both share antitrust jurisdiction in the united states, are facing a lot of criticism from people people where enforcement has not been aggressive enough. allowing tech companies to buy potential rivals and potential companies that are competitors. whereever covered a case an agency has gone back to undo a deal that has already been consummated. someannouncement has drawn cautio

talks with the fcc to pay a negotiated multi-billion dollar fine for its involvement in the cambridge analyticato negotiations on how much it will be find. you would think the fcc might want to couple with that number on its own. a remind tore listen to my reports coast to coast on the salem national network. joining us, pastor robert jeffress from the methodist church in dallas. >> today americans got to see what a real president looks like. this president is willing to do whatever it takes to keep this country safe. he has said to me -- i know he talks to you. but he has said to me for the last three years, robert, i'm going to do whatever it takes to keep this country safe. for him american security is not a cam plainl slogan or campaign promise. it's his core conviction and it guides everything he does. lou: mayor among presidents. he's willing in declaring that national emergency to show the courage to take on the cartels, because ways not said by the radical dems which has not been mentioned by republican and democratic presidents has been the word cartel. they haven't had the guts out of

we saw this with facebook through the cambridge analytica issue. are they using it for third-party advertising data or using it to inform internal data sets? that is important. some of the companies are glossing over that. i think they are using the data for internal data sets, which gives them the ability to more finely grained target customers for a whole bunch of services. the second point, related to data, is that we have all of these amazing services today. companies are giving us these for free, and what is important is >> you are seeing the-itis across in a willve the work and au isly: the 27-year-old female now running text latest unicorn. platformed at fashion based in singapore in 2014. she raised 220 $6 million from investors and the company has a valuation nearing $1 billion. running to discuss is rebecca greenfield covering diversity for bloomberg. companies are ran just 2% funding from venture capitalists. how rare is a female founded unicorn? occurrence. rare there are a few companies that get the high valuation. to raise for someone

the latest investigation started after cambridge analytica improperly accessed data.privacy practices. the fcc is focusing on weather or not recent privacy breaches violated the amazon cancel pla build a second headquarters in new york. this came after backlash over promises that amazon would get about $3 billion in tax breaks as part of they would provide jobs to new york city, pulling out of it is considered a big blow to the governor and the mayor, as they lobbied hard for that amazon campus. riddick say it would have provided little benefit to most new yorkers. >> we are reclaiming our to cut economy and democracy, these are our neighborhoods. we have stood against alien errors attempting to extract - - we have stood against billionaires. for the first time, the cdc is tracking how many people have died from flu related illnesses, the flu has claimed 16,000 lives. in the past years we have seen deaths between 12,000 and 79,000. the flu vaccine this season is half the time. >>> a stretch of westbound highway 37 remains closed on the north bay this morning. it shoul

>> cambridge analytica always sets off red alerts and alarm bells for me.his is how little we know about the mueller investigation. how little we know. this money han has subpoenas an his work going on. >> what happened last summer? >> my point. now he's putting the pieces of the puzzle together. >> 97% you hear the mueller investigation is wrapping up, that's rudy giuliani or sekulow, that's trump's alleged legal team. those guys spend 95% -- always wrapping up stories, coming out of the white house or trump's legal world. they don't come from mueller because he doesn't talk. he doesn't leak. the most her medic organization i've seen in d.c. >> and nearing a close, and the thing we don't know wah we don't know so much about the mueller investigation is where when he see subpoenas like this, how much is completed by the time it's reported? >> all right. leave it at that for now. joyce vance, thank you. rest of my panel sticks around. >>> coming up, all-out assault against the emergency declarati declaration. first, "saturday night live" poking fun at the ne

. >>> facebook had the egregious issues with cambridge analytica that caught so much attention in thereally about a whole economy of companies that includes google it includes the credit card processors, it includes the cellular companies, people who sell data who do not, if you will, respect the fact that the people whose data is in question should have not only control of what happens to it but in fact may have rights of privacy that preclude the sale of the data in the first place. and to me that is the conversation that needs to happen and if we think about things like smart devices with alexa or google home or ai, those issues become a lot more important and facebook actually becomes a much smaller part of that conversation because they don't play in those categorys the same way they play in social >> roger, in light of these points and key questions you're raising, facebook stock is up 24% since the start of this year are you surprised? >> i think they had a knockout fourth quarter the stock had been beaten down if that's the worst of it, the stock is absolutely priced properly

the probe was spurred that cambridge analytica was using facebook data for the trump campaign and questionsn the brexit campaign here. its aim is to influence public policy. there's laws now being considered in the u.s. for privacy. for facebook, an executive said "we share the commitment and concern from the committee about false news and election integrity." they said that facebook was open to meaningful regulations. looks like there could be more coming their way. shep? >> shepard: thanks, greg. army officials are rethinking how they bring in new soldiers after they missed their recruitment goal. they said they fell 6,500 short of their target. so now they're taking a new approach. including social media and hip hop. they try to attract a younger generation. jennifer griffin reporting live from the pentagon. hi, jen. >> hi, shep. 70% of those of military age are not fit to serve. for the first time since 2005, the army missed their recruiting goal last year. most of those that signed up came from the south and midwest, not from coastal cities. so two young army recruiters came up with th

cambridge analytica is under investigation for use of facebook users' information. >> a lot of peopleis mark zuckerberg on all this. >> we were slow to respond. it took us a couple of extra days. that was a big deal that we didn't respond that quickly. we were really trying to figure out what happened and we weren't able to do it quickly enough. >> mark zuckerberg is breaking his silence to cnn, talking about the election data breach debacle. >> i remember sitting across from mark zuckerberg. inside that room it felt incredibly tense. >> an element of accountability, as difficult as it is for me to do a tv interview i should be out there and being asked hard questions by journalists. >> what happened? what went wrong? >> this was a major breach of trust and i'm really sorry that this happened. >> there were previous instances where they had to issue apologies for breaches in the past. this was different. >> senator john thune and much of washington was watching closely. >> we're already sort of contemplating how to proceed in terms of our oversight role. we want to make sure that we'r

of course remember the cambridge analytica privacy scandal last year?n part the report concludes this. companies like facebook should not be allowed to behave like digital gangsters in the online world. considering themselves to be ahead of, beyond the law. that is pretty strong stuff. but today, as you said, connell, mr. zuckerberg relented agreed to a 30-minute meeting with uk culture secretary jeremy wright at the facebook california headquarters. 30 minutes. not a whole lot of time. certainly won't produce any breakthroughs how facebook can better police itself, hey it is a start, right? facebook says it tripled the size of the team working to protect users from bad content to 30,000 people. the company says it is also invested heavily in machine learning, artificial intelligence, computer vision technology to try to prevent abuse. facebook says it is quote, open to meaningful regulation and that could come soon and it could hurt the bottom line. the uk announced a new digital services tax that is set to begin next year. meantime germany ordered fac

the sec's latest investigation started last year after reports that the company cambridge analytica improperly accessed data on some $87 million facebook users. back in 2011, facebook had an agreement with the fcc to improve their private pack siss. they are focusing on whether facebook's recent privacy breaches violated that agreement. >>> well it may feel too early, but we have the details on the democratic presidential debates for the 2020 election. a senior democratic election official outlined the network. up to 20 candidates, they will be able to participate if they make certain pulling or grassroots thresholds. if more than 20 candidates meet both qualifying thresholds, they would feel use their polling averages to weed out the candidates. california senator kamala harris picked up an early endorsement for her campaign. oakland congresswoman barbara lee tweeting yesterda she is supporting harris. >>> for the first time ever, vietnamese airline companies will be able to fly to the united states. there are currently no non-stop flights between vietnam and the u.s. and the bay area is cert

but it's important for the public to shine a light on for instance, cambridge analytica.umers to have a choice to go somewhere else, you go to fox. you have an alternative. so then it's okay and government doesn't have to step in. >> i don't think government should step in at all. once you see the state of the union and the geriatric politicians, most of of whom have been in office since the development of the telephone. they went after the banks and oil companies. it's going to be a dog and pony show and hopefully no regulations will get done. >> i agree the public can decide what they what to do about how facebook handles their material. these main large companies have a funny way of blocking other startups or goj them up if they look like they can be a threat. i care about the anti-trust aspect because it keeps the con seemers from having choices. i'm so concerned about my privacy. look at my vacation photos. i'm not home so please rob my house. people don't care about privacy right now but they will in the future. lit create an opportunity for some company to come in

. >> i remember going into interview mark zuckerberg during the cambridge analytica scandal.mething we look over and talk a lot about in the documentary and it was just this high pressure moment for mark zuckerberg for the company, and everybody was waiting to hear from mark zuckerberg, no one heard from him, people were so upset. i want to play you a clip from the upcoming documentary to set the scene. take a listen. >> reporter: it was march 2018 and i just remember sitting across from mark zuckerberg inside that room, it just felt incredibly tense. >> there's an element of accountability whereas uncomfortable as it is for me to do a tv interview, this is an important thing that as a discipline for what we're doing, i should be out there and being asked hard questions by journalists. >> what happened? what went wrong? >> this was a major breach of trust and i'm really sorry that this happened. >> there were previous instances where they had to issue apologies for breaches in the past. this was different. >> i've gone back to facebook and for this documentary we interviewed

think there are two important points of their, we saw this with facebook, going through the cambridge analyticade and so on. are they using it for third-party advertising data or informy using it to internal data sets? it is important. and i think some of the companies are glossing over that. so i think that they use this and they are using the data for internal data sets, which gives them the ability to more finely grained-target customers for a whole bunch of services. that is the first point. the second point, related to data, which i think is critical, we have all these amazing services today that companies are giving us for free, software services. important isis quarter after quarter, these companies are managing to get more and more margin and profit out of these products, and that is happening because they are monetizing the data behind these services. at more and more granular levels. i think the fact that we have a handful of companies becoming massive data collectors on all quarters of our life -- on all corners of our life, is a problem. i don't think it is good for society, users,

-based firm, cambridge analytica, swiss miss using facebook data for the trump campaign. are questions also about russian meddling and the brexit campaign, for example. another election campaign. doesn't target exact laws put in place, but mentioned some guidelines. they're pretty tough digital privacy rules here in the u.k. and the e.u., rules that aren't also being looked at right now by the u.s. also, efforts to politicize the digital cyber space being looked at on both sides of the pond. as for facebook, we got a bit of a reaction to today's release from the committee. they say they share the committee's concerns about false news and election integrity, and they say they are open to meaningful regulation. there could be more coming again from the u.k. in the u.s. and what could be another tough year for the tech giants in 2019. back to you, melissa. >> melissa: greg palkot, thank you. the white house defending president trump's national emergency declaration amid fierce backlash. one of the president -- using it to go my supporters. pointing out the terms team is also

-based cambridge analytica firms used to facebook data to target potential trump voters in 2016. >> what is at least make the facebook itself realize it has a responsibility ies not just as a platform, but as a publisher. >> singled out, facebook ceo mark zuckerberg, when he testified on capitol hill, refused to come to london. he accused of showing contemporary to facebook u.k. executive says the company shares the committee's concerns about false news and election integrity. it is open to a meaningful regulation. more regulation could be on the way. the report recommending a series of laws be put in place along with already strong digital guidelines. the u.s. congress is conducting its own digital probe. republican senator marco rubio last month proposed a new law to reign in the likes of facebook. the explosive findings from the u.k. report could provide more support. bret? >> bret: greg palkot in london. thanks. up next, we begin a weeklong analysis of congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez's controversial green new deal. first, beyond our borders tonight. the international rescue co

facebook has had several privacy issued in the last few years, including the cambridge analytica scandal. >>> let's take a live look at the new york stock exchange. we're up 286 points right now. investors are reacting positively to a report that trade talks with china will resume next week. >>> i was just reading that. if this continues today, this will be the 8th week that the dow will be up. good news for investors. >>> new at 6:00, a closer look at toy story 4. >> an exclusive clip released on gma this morning, it appears that woody and little bo peep are teaming up for mischief. >> lost toy, side yard. >> raise the blinds. >> they have names? >> you never told me that. >> you never asked. >> annie potts who plays bo peep is one. few returning cast members. her son convinced her to take on the iconic role more than 20 years ago. >> annie they're interested in you doing the first completely computer animated full-length movie. none of that was interesting to me. not any part of that sentence. they said, well they've sent you some shorts. they'd like to you take a look. i came home fro

opportunity to be inside during some of the pivotal moments like the data privacy scandal with cambridge analytica and you begin to understand the steps the company is taking and all of the real challenges that lie ahead. >> it looks like he has evolved too. he used to be reticent about sitting down with anybody. i remember his first 60 minutes interview, he was sweating profusely, didn't want to do it. and of course your first interviews with him, he seems to have gotten more comfortable with the idea of sharing as much information as he is feeling comfortable with at the moment. >> look, i will be honest, i don't think it is mark zuckerberg's favorite thing to do to be in front of cameras. he is known as a product guy, behind the scenes, talking to people. he said this to me, i need to be doing this. there's much more responsibility to be more transparent and public facing now that he rules a digital kingdom of more than 2 billion people. >> incredible. lori, thank you so much. we will watch your documentary as well. that airs tomorrow night, 9:00 eastern on cnn. >>> back to lawrence, massachuse

>> yeah, look, i remember walking in during the cambridge analytica scandal in march 2018.any. mark zuckerberg doesn't like doing on-camera interviews. i remember it was this moment that so many people wanted to hear from mark zuckerberg. for me, having covered tech for many years, it was this moment tech had almost become mainstream. everyone wanted to know. everyone was upset about facebook and this data scandal and everybody wanted to hear from mark zuckerberg. you weave in and out of this company throughout the years and begin to understand why they're in the position they're in, what the challenging questions are going forward, and that's what we try to do in this documentary, kind of go back to the beginning and look at that. >> what do you hope people take away from the documentary tonight? >> well, you know, look, i think it's really easy to look at facebook right now, but i also think you almost, to understand where it is right now, you have to go back to that beginning. i hope people look at the complications that the privacy scandals throughout facebook history,

jim walden represents a former analyst at cambridge analytica, mueller interviewed kaiser.nis vacco represents michael caputo who was interviewed, and annemarie mcavoy, represented rick gates who pleaded guilty, is a cooperating witness in the mueller probe. i'm very excited to hear from each of you. thanks to you all for doing this. >> thanks for having us. >> i wonder if week begin with a big question. what did you talk about most, what did they ask about most when you were in there? >> it is unfortunately difficult to discuss what really went on as we were representing our clients and certainly for me with gates. >> as we say, next. >> obviously they were interested in michael caputo's involvement in the campaign. he was there a short time, their horizon was limited to time he was in the campaign. >> russia stuff? >> generally interested in his involvement in the campaign. there were some generic questions about contacts with individuals that might have had russian surnames, but nothing in particular with caputo. >> i'm in the same boat as annemarie. go ahead. >> pass. >

alexander nix from cambridge analytica, dana rohrabacher, the president's secretary from his longtime business, rhona graff. lots and lots of people. transcripts amounting to thousands of pages. and, again, we don't know if any of those people, any of those witnesses who testified under oath before the intel committee, we don't know if any of them are facing any kind of felony legal jeopardy that roger stone and michael cohen have run up against and sam patten has run up against in their dealings with federal prosecutors. but the conveying of these official transcripts to robert mueller's office today means that the special counsel, if they do want the bring legal charges against anyone for false statements in this testimony, the special counsel now has the ability to do that with these official transcripts. so in terms of what's going to happen next here, don't expect a bus tour from the president to highlight his state of the union messages, such as they were. the president's longtime personal lawyer michael cohen had been scheduled to testify in congress in public tomorrow, an open

investigative report by uk lawmakers calling the social media company digital gangster the infamous cambridge analyticast year early facebook investor roger mcnamee also weighing in earlier today. >> if you believe there isn't going to be any kind of regulatory pressure on the company, you know, the uk thing is just talk, right? it's not actual change if that's the worst of it, then the stock is absolutely priced properly you know, may even still be a value here >> shares of facebook ending flat today, but are up 24% this year so will regulation become just a reality? is it just tough tech talk karen, is this a concern of yours here >> it's sort of a concern, but i mean when you look at the stock, when you look at the earnings they put up and look at where the stock is trading, right, as we know it's sort of the poster boy for bad behavior for social media. however, i think that's getting to be an old story now we've seen some -- we saw the eu gdpr. could we see something in the uk yes. could we see something here? we could that will be hard for congress to get together and do some legislation there bu

now we knew that this data firm, cambridge analytica, had reached out to wikileaks during the campaignrying to coordinate any release of hillary clinton's e-mails, which of course were stolen by russia. that story was intriguing when it broke, but it might have had little legal importance if it was just e-mails about things that never happened. now we're learning for the first time the guardian reporting mueller's team questioned a cambridge employee, brittany kaiser. that's interesting because that firm had largely been fading from view in the wake of the giant scandal about misusing americans' information taken from facebook. back when that scandal broke, we actually interviewed this person mueller wants to talk to, kaiser. we asked if cambridge interacted with the operation or was helped by it. >> it is possible that cambridge or other data firms that had more of an american expertise might have somehow been helped, used, or interacted with the russian operation? >> anybody in the world can purchase and license the data of individuals in america. you don't have to have been an ameri