supervisor campos: thank you. i just want to make sure we're not leaving anything on the table. finally, with respect to wastewater enterprise, there was a report that came out october of this year on hanson aggregates. there was a report that cannot in july of this year. i am wondering what happened and what the plan is for going forward. >> we ensure that the auditing division is aware of the follow- up requirement, and we work closely with them, i would say the moment we receive the request, to get a response within a few weeks. at times, there is a lot of discussion about some of the responses. what i can assure you today is that for the wastewater enterprise, the response, we have it ready. it is in the process of being approved prior to being distributed, so i want to make sure that they receive this tomorrow. supervisor campos: thank you. maybe it is the lawyer in me, but i think if there is a deadline, the deadline should be met. >> i understand, and i agree with you. supervisor campos: colleagues, any que

supervisor campos: thank you. another announcement is we do have an overflow room, so if you are looking for a seat, there is more space in a room to 15. please call item 1. >> item 1, hearing on city departments progress on implementation of audit recommendations by the controller and city services auditor. supervisor campos: colleagues, this is an item i requested. as we go through specific artists, we want to come back subsequently to find out what progress has been made with respect to the numbers and recommendations that were made with respect to these audits. with that, i will turn it over to the controller's office. >> we are here to talk about the audit follow-up process that we manage. real quickly, the benefits of following up on august are the actual implementation of those recommendations rather than the findings. one of the reasons for the audit follow-up process is it helps us to ensure that departments are apt -- actually implementing the recommendations through the correct action -- corrective acti

supervisor campos: recommendation eight. i actually like the recommendation. >> i apologize to interrupt your deliberation. the chair of the business thought a review board with a year earlier and had to leave to go back to work, but on this recommendation, they have forwarded to the civil grand jury and to use the concurrence with the ongoing this -- ongoing the >> finding no. 11, this is, i think, it seems to me that i am happy to say yes to this, it just seems to be the nature of the beast and nothing to do with how they -- i think it's how they handle certain cases and taking them inside. i would say no to recommendation number 10. supervisor campos: president chiu, any thoughts on 13? whistle-blower investigation, and establishing the appeals process? president chiu: they seem fairly straightforward. >> the understanding that we will look at whether it is the appropriate mechanism going forward, i don't want to decide that here today. i think there is a process needed to have some type of appeal here. and the findings o

supervisor campos: thank you. in the other member of the public who would like to speak? the cnn, public comment is closed. we have an action item, the minutes. we have a motion and a second. we can take that without objection. madam clerk, please call item number 3. >> citizens advisory committee report, an information item. supervisor campos: now if we could hear from the citizens' advisory committee. >> chairman campos and members of the committee, my name is bob switzer, and i am representing glenn davis today, who cannot be here. and me just say there is one item on your agenda that i have a personal interest in, and that is item four. but i am here today to make the presentation on behalf of the cac, and i wanted to be specific about item six. item six was handled by the cac on its consent calendar as an information item, and at the time it engendered no discussion. however, at the end of our agenda there were a couple of comments that i want to convey to you and a couple of issues raised that would be appro

supervisor campos: now if we could hear from the citizens' advisory committee. >> chairman campos and members of the committee, my name is bob switzer, and i am representing glenn davis today, who cannot be here. and me just say there is one item on your agenda that i have a personal interest in, and that is item four. but i am here today to make the presentation on behalf of the cac, and i wanted to be specific about item six. item six was handled by the cac on its consent calendar as an information item, and at the time it engendered no discussion. however, at the end of our agenda there were a couple of comments that i want to convey to you and a couple of issues raised that would be appropriate to mention it to you. first, cac member wendy tran, who has been extremely helpful in our deliberations because of her expertise, has asked that the transportation impacts of the van ness avenue proposal before you have included the california medical center and whether or not those would be addressed in the draft environmental impact report for van ness avenue brt. staff noted that the aut

supervisor campos: thank you. next speaker please. >> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is kerwin chen, secretary of chinese companies. i am a regular user of line 30. the bus route closing market street at third and fourth street are so packed most of the day, even though it does not seem to relieve the overcrowding situation. the intersections -- they are always built up with vehicles, including a long line of buses. they cause congestions, delays, and dirty air along market street between second and fifth. transportation passengers under crown not only help citizens to and from chinatown and north beach, it also improves traffic conditions downtown and brings a greater environment. it is the most effective way to transport a large number of passengers in a world-class city like san francisco. we need that as soon as possible. thank you. supervisor campos: thank you. next speaker please. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i am here today to reiterate our support. we have supported the central subway since the be

supervisor campos: thank you. next speaker please. >> good afternoon. jim lazarus, chamber of commerce. the chamber has supported this project since it started years ago from the county line downtown into chinatown, and we hope that the next resolution from the board of supervisors will be urging the cta and the mta to design the next phase. if this subject was going to go as far as portsmouth square, it would be good enough, but i do not think that in our children's lifetime we will see a subject in to fisherman's wharf. that we will see this line extended into lombard and van ness. that should be the 30-year vision, not fighting over whether we will complete phase two of a previously approved -- and as you heard the testimony of years and years of public meetings here at commissions and a citizens group supporting this project. this is serving the fastest- growing part of san francisco -- districts 6 and 10. in the last census, that part of san francisco added -- pardon me, all of san but cisco added about 30,00

supervisor campos: present. president chiu: here. supervisor chu: here. supervisor farrell: present. supervisor kim: present. supervisor mirkarimi: present. supervisor weiner: present. >> all members are present. president chiu: please join me in the pledge of allegiance. >> i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. president chiu: we have our act september 27 board meeting minutes. motion by supervisor farrell, seconded by mar. are there any communications? >> we have a communication from the mayor which would amend -- about his veto, which would amend the administrative code. items one through 10 comprise the consent agenda. there will be considered by a single roll call vote unless a member wishes and item be severed, in which case it would be considered separately. president chiu: seeing none. supervisor farrell: aye. supervisor kim: aye. supervisor mar: aye. supervisor mirkarimi: aye. supervisor weiner: aye. supervisor

supervisor campos: thank you. we're looking forward to your run for supervisor in a few years. always entertaining. thank you. sorry to fairfield, san jose, and oakland. again, thank you to the mayor's office, housing, department of human resources, and to the poa for showing up today and for colleagues being a part of this. from my perspective, the purpose today is to get the conversation started. i think that having our police and public safety officials living in the city on a daily basis does improve our public safety. it is startling to hear the statistic that 75% of our police officers, about 65% of our fire fighters, to the outside san francisco, about the same for deputy sheriffs. but i really want to start the conversation about how we expand it to dig about first responders, and whether it is emergency personnel might be a great way to think about that. and you know, as we heard, i think there're certain instances that we're not going to build a change behavior. those that want more sunshine in square fo

supervisor campos: ok. just to clarify how you are thinking about this now, are you proposing, if it came to installing parking meters, or you are saying there's a local feed to quali to qualify? >> if this passes, we would recommend doubling the number of blousoue zones. in those zones, we would put some sort of payment mechanism. you would pull into the spot. you would be required to pay for the spot, like a meter, just like every other driver, but you would have a spot in the front of the building. if you are a low-income person, you can pull up to the same spot and we would give you some parking card or some kind of discount to put into the meter. this is really about accessibility. once you are at the blue zone, you would be asked to paid like every other able bodied person. >supervisor campos: are they related? >> we believe that if you make people pay for the restores, they will not go and get a false disabled placard. right now, they are getting free parking. there would be no advantage to getting t

supervisor campos, supervisor kim, and supervisor mar. i wanted to buy for that co- sponsorship of this resolution does two things. it expresses support for the occupy wall street movement. it is something that i am wholeheartedly behind, especially in the expression of great frustration and concern about our economic system that for decades has been favoring the 1% over the greater 99%. wheezy tax breaks and major corporations and businesses that do not pay their fair share in taxes. meanwhile, taxes are increased for every date people. we're losing our services that make our society much more meaningful. health care, education, affordable housing, and we need to speak with a greater voice about changing our economic system that can really benefit the many and not just the few. i have been very inspired by the expression of solidarity all around the world for the occupy wall street movement and the occupations happening all across this country, not just here in the bay area. this past month, i have been asked to intervene on a couple of

supervisor campos: finding number six.the lack of public reporting of the whistle-blower investigation fails to provide

commissioner campos, would you like to introduce this item? commissioner campos: thank you for taking your time to be here. and i know he had a prior meeting. think you for your flexibility in coming to speak with us. for those of you that were here when this item was first requested and for those of you that are new to the board, i want to simply put this in some context. last year i requested a management, operational audit of the mta. at the time that the audit was requested, the mta had not been subject to a management operations audit in 14 years. as of best practice under our rules under the board of supervisors, we want agencies to undergo of management performance of it, at least every eight years. -- we want agencies to undergo management performances at least every eight years. what we have before you is the second phase of the audit. the first phase was conducted by the office of budget and legislative analyst. with respect to the second phase of the audit, we engaged cgr management consultants to conduct audit, and from my perspect

supervisor campos: aye. president chiu: aye. collapse there are 11 aye's. president chiu: these resolutions are adopted. >> to support a full legislative process for the 2012 farm bill. supervisor elsbernd: i moved to continue this for one week. president chiu: there is a motion and a second. if we could do that without objection, this item will be continued to the 22nd of november. madam color, can you read the in memoriams? >> this will be adjourned on behalf of supervisor kim and president chiu for the late ho. on behalf of supervisor avalos for the late jesse morris. president chiu: is there a more business in front of this body? >> that concludes our business for today. president chiu: ladies and gentlemen, we are adjourned. supervisor mirkarimi: good morning. welcome to the san francisco county transportation authority. ross mirkarimi, chair. i apologize for the slight delay. >> >> supervisor avalos -- >> present. >> supervisor campos -- >> present. >> supervisor chiu -- absent. >> supervisor chu -- >> present. >> supervisor cohen -- >> present. >> su