in the situation we were in today, i know it is an up and down vote i'll be supporting supervisor campos proposal around short-term rentals and not sport supervisor farrell but i hope this conversation didn't end today we've got a long ways to go on this proposal. >> supervisor kim the cap from item 7 was removed to roared rearview mirror to the original cap we voted on previously and also for clarity supervisor christensen has duplicate the file and the unamended version of item 7 and back to committee supervisor yee. >> thank you supervisor president breed i realize i appreciate people's comments on my amendment that i presented earlier and i was trying to explain to my colleagues that i choose to pit rh1 rh1 d and rh2 to cover most of my district but where people's comments i realized that this extends into the other people's districts quite steven and i think i'm thinking at this point that my still have district 7 but no impact on anyone else's district is two introduce the same amendments and to delete rh1 and rh2 and only thing that impacts is the notification is where the rh1 d i

small business for thirty years and the probability all kinds of reporting i don't know if supervisor campos has talked with the home sharers and those are not afraid of reporting or running a small business and as a matter of fact that many of them prefer it it gives them control of the information rather than doling out to platforms i want to make sure that nothing preincludes a platform from reporting from home sharers this is made between the platform and the home sharers they can do that frankly is a a great business model we've got something platforms can with distinguish their platforms but i think as people who that might have more legal experience than i do will know that the problem is we do have any platforms in the city and to the point that supervisor farrell made earlier there's a chance many more to come and don't priority operates on the same business model they don't collect fund and not directly involved in the registration or the number of days they can't report that information and we, in fact have legal persistent that mrofrmz that act on this as a connect our as people

. >> supervisor campos. >> thank you madam president i do want to thank supervisor wiener for the work i will be voting no on this for the reasons that supervisor kim outlined i do have concerns about the process and the timing of this and i worry that because of that we'll end up paying more than $400000 more i have to say that i share the concern in terms of the amount of those fees i paid those fees before and i know that was not an easy thing for me, you can imagine how this impacts lower-income folks that i think will have a tough time so i think that reimplication of the level of fees that should be charged is appropriate so for those reasons i'll be voting no day today. >> thank you, supervisor wiener. >> first of all thank supervisor kim's and supervisor campos for their remarks i think we all agree tow fees not only in san francisco but a lot of the cities are excessive in terms of the impact on people we've made improvements around people that trial video no culpability because their cars are stolen and dumped there are also plenty of people their cars are not stolen but they

we'll accompany with compromises we didn't get that plaster of what i don't like about supervisor campos legislation is the 60 days limitation i feel like for me listening to some of the stories that i note that all of us have heard similar stories 60 days is too short and that is something i prefer not to support 65 days is better than 60 and supervisor farrell's there's a lot of things in it there but and it is just a matter of a difference of opinion it doesn't feel like it's enforceable at this point, i'm hoping if it passes it i could be wrong but want to be clear that there are good about the points to both of the legislation and thank you u thank you supervisor yee for clarity supervisor christensen duplicate the file in other words, to send the duplicate file back to the committee with the amendment that passed by supervisor yee we must take a roll call vote so colleagues it was moved by supervisor christensen to send it back to committee seconded by supervisor farrell and amended by supervisor yee to include rh1 so with that is that clear okay madam clerk please call the roll sp

. >> thank you madam president supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar not present be supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor wiener madam president we have quorum thank you ladies and gentlemen, please join us in the pledge of allegiance and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all thank you, everyone madam clerk any communication. >> none to report. >> colleagues, any changes to the board meeting minutes for by supervisor cowen and supervisor campos colleagues we'll take that without objection. those pass after. okay madam clerk call our 2:00 p.m. special order first order of business the populate between the mayor ed lee and eligible members of the board of supervisors they're being no questions from the eligible supervisors the mayor may address the board up to 5 minutes >> welcome to the board chambers mayor ed lee and good afternoon board of supervisors and to the audience that is here thank you thank you for your t

campos, no. christensen, aye. cohen no. >> madam clerk i can't hear. >> supervisor kim [inaudible] >> recess while we clear the room. we left off at the vote and we were at supervise r christensen. >> christensen said aye. cohen, aye. farrell, aye. kim, no. mar no. tang aye. there are 6 aye and 5 no with supervisor yee, avalos, campos, kim and mar in the descent. >> okay. the resolution is adopted as amended. madam clerk can you please call the next item >> item 24 is ordinance to amen it admin sthraitive code to establish the cannabis legalization task force to [inaudible] regarding the local impact of possibly legislation of cannabis and setting forlth the membership and deutaeds of the task force >> colleagues today before us is legislation to create the cannabis state legalization task force. i want to thank my cosponsors supervisor kim and supervisor mar for joining me in this legislation as well as jeff [inaudible] in my office for his hard work on it. we have seen cannabis legalization effort succeed in oth

colleagues supervisor campos has made a motion to amend his legislation nebraska item number 6 sect by commissioner avalos can we take that we'll take that without objection. we'll take that without objection. it passes supervisor campos imagine. >> supervisor farrell. >> thank you supervisor president london breed i want to thank supervisor campos for introducing that amendment we've included from the beginning of the legislation so colleagues last year, we passed a regulatory framework that was historic for regulating our short-term rentals in san francisco as we all know this is extremely complicated topic every 11 of us has a different point of view on this topic since then our city and departments other officials have and people inside and outside of city hall has continued to look at the legislation it's logic ice cream to get the law right i believe that home sharers is here to stay and we should support responsibly home sharers here in san francisco in fact home sharers and vacation hosts have existed in our city but the practice has garden more attention of the platforms and s

no. 7 as amended can you please call the roll. >> supervisor avalos no supervisor breed supervisor campos no supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim no supervisor mar no supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no there are 6 i's and 5 nos with supervisor avalos supervisor campos supervisor kim and supervisor yee in the decendents. >> this ordinance is passed on see first reading m we're now past 2:30 can we go to the 2:30. accumulations with supervisor cowen. >> madam president supervisor cohen. >> thank you. >> colleagues today i'd like to recognize the san francisco affairs veteran affairs commission and the friends of the that concludes my report chicago memorial for the awareness and remembrance the port chicago discharge and they're ongoing survivors of this terrible incident that occurred in july 1944 now for you who are unfamiliar with the port of chicago incidents i'll explain what happened on jill 171944 crews were working in the san francisco bay area loading two pacific bond vessels when the explosive ignited in a terrific series of bl

supervisor campos, present. madam president all members are present >> thank you ladies and gentlemen can you please join us in the pledge of allegiance? i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. thank you. madam clerk are there any communications >> i have no communications >> colleagues are there change tooz the may 19th or june second board meeting minutes some seeing none motion to approve the minutes? motion by supervisor farrell and second by supervisor mar. can we take that without objection? without objection the meeting minutes will pass after-public comment. madam clerk can you please read the consent agenda >> iletms 1-5 thesis items are considered routine. if a member object as item may row removaled and considered separately >> anyone want foosever any items on the consent agenda? >> item 1-5, supervisor yee, aye. avalos, aye. supervisor breed, aye. campos, aye. chris

tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no there are 6 i's and 590s commissioner avalos supervisor campos supervisor kim supervisor yee and supervisor mar in the descendants the amendments pass madam clerk on item 6 please call the roll. >> oh supervisor kim. >> okay i believe that since we've finished the amendments i want to speak to both proposals. >> yes. >> so again i want to state my thoughts about the proposals i know i've stated them a month ago when the items were heard i want to provide a larger frame for the debate before the board right now this conversation today is not just about short-term rentals but about a larger conversation of that that 0 body vision and save city should provide through the planning code this city has been granted power by the state to regulate land use and development we determine the uses ethnicity and how much use to provide a healthy balance for instance we answer the questions on how much residential hours where we build it and how many j.p. morgan and what kinds of jobs how many office jobs versus merchandising. >> how many open space and parks f

week's land use commission they heard the mergers and the special district on june 2nd supervisor camposdinance for the mergers if greater than 7 hundred and 99 square feet in the proposed 24 special use district which, generally included all potrero and cesar chavez and bodies from cap to bartlett it is in effect for 45 device days with an option to extend up to two years it is a process involving the stakeholders in collaboration with the office of economic workforce development and supervisor campos office the planning department has been involved with that effort while the community stakeholders have been meeting individual the process began in 2014 the process to formulate the office of economic workforce development policies to preserve and enhance the vital of the community open 24th street one of the main ordinances to maintain smaller and affordable commercial spaces and the my name is not the other goals to retain existing businesses and provide times for permanent strategies for office of economic workforce development for smaller spaces in the corridor supervisor wiener expre

the roll please and to continue items to jill 21st commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee there are 11 i's. >> okay. those items are continued until the next meeting madam clerk can you please call the next item. >> item 33 a resolution inform retroactively to accept and expend the grants for $600,000 for the empowerment funds for the job connect program. colleagues, can we take those amendments without objection we'll take that without objection. the resolution is adapted >> item 34 an ordinance for calling for a special election in san francisco on tuesday november 3rd, 2015, for the purpose have to occur 3 hundred and 10 indebted for the housing improvements to authorize the pass through of the property tax increase and to provide for the levy and collection of the tax for the interest requires 8 affirmative votes. >> supervisor campos. >> colleagues, i have my name as a sponsor of the jail bond and originally sponsored a jail bond th

campos cohen, aye. farrell, aye. kim, aye. mar, aye. tang, aye. wiener, aye. there are 11 aye >> this ordinance passed unanimously. can you please call item 15&ordinance to amend subsection of the general plan known as ren conhill plan and incorporate into the streetscape master plan and make other technical amendments and findings under sequa >> supervisor cohen. okay. colleagues can we take this item same house samea call? without objection theords nns is passed on the first reading. can you please call item 16, 17 and 18 >> 3 resolutions to authorize the mayor to cast assessment ballots on behalf of the [inaudible] improvement district to be named for item 16, sate owned parcel in the dog patch and potrero hill. [inaudible] yerba buena community district and item 18 a parcel of property in the rincon hill district >> colleagues can we tace these items same house and call? these are passed unanimously >> establish the last 10 dayoffs jan as restaurant week and eliminate the health code of [inaudible] >> colleagues can we take this item same house same call?

thank you. >> thank you supervisor campos. supervisor cohen >> thank you i submit >> supervisor farrell >> thank you madam clerk. colleagues i have one item today for introduction. over the past few years i continued to hear from kin stucherants inside and outside of district 2 about their wishes to be notified about project that impact their neighborhood. whether they want to know about a project or development we debate about here in city hall or whether the meeting stop is moved. there a few examples we make inside city hall that have a impact on the quality of life in the neighborhood. currently if renz dchbts want information they have to request that information from the city department responsible for the projects. often we have [inaudible] planning and pleny orelt departments but it doesn't cover all the things that impact quality of life in our neighborhoods. in the technology capital of the #ur78d world in san francisco i believe our residence should have advanced access to decision squz projects impacts their neighb

supervisor campos, you have some brief remarks? >> just briefly, madame chair, i want to thank all of the members of the public who came out and speak on all sides of this issue. i think those who have concerns about some of the things that have been proposed, i encourage them to become involved in this process. one of the problems that i have with the way in which this process has been described is the reference to calle 24th as an "exclusive entity." the reality is that the board of supervisors and mayor created this council and the idea is to continue to be to include every member of this community. and the and beauty of 24th street, what makes 24th street so unique, the fact there are so many diverse people with so many diverse views. so i encourage you to be involved. the last thing i would say, is that one of the things that one of the things that the community made very clear, that they wanted a lot more included in the interim controls. one of the things that was discussed and requested at some point was to actually have a

campos, aye. christensen, aye. cohen, aye. farrell, aye. kim, aye. mar, aye. tang, aye. wiener, aye. there are 11 aye >> this motion is approved. madam clerk can you call item 23 please >> item 23 is a motion to appoint theodora marie it the entertainment commission. without objection this motion is approved unanimously. madam clerk can we please go to roll call for introductions. >> supervisor yee is first up to introduce new business. >> thank you madam clerk. there are a few items i would like to introduce today. as soon as i can find them. so, the first item is a request for the development of a white paper and state of design guidelines on family friending housing in san francisco. today i am introducing the resolution to the planning department to development the white paper and the guideline frz family friendly housing in san francisco. over the past several months i have met with planning dweckter john ram and thestaff about this. we have also engaged in initial discussions with housing developers btd this issue. it is a well known fact we need to coo more to ret

. >> supervisor campos made a motion to send this item back to committee. second by supervisor avalos. madam clerk can you please call the roll >> on the motion to send item 23 back to committee, supervisor wiener. no. yee, aye. avalos, aye. breed, no. campos, aye. christensen, no. cohen, no. farrell, no. kim, aye. mar, aye. tang, no. 4 aye and 7 no with the no being supervisor wiener, breed, campos, christensen, colon, farrell and tang. >> the motion to send this item back to committee fails. supervisor yee >> thank you president breed. so, it is true that most of us would like to see inyeas in police officers on our streets and so forth and most of us will be supporting it to get up to the 1971. i support it and i wouldn't be supporting with the mayor lee suggested in terms of having 5 classes for the next year. to be trutful walking if n to had chamber i was willing to look at numbers beyond 1971. what i wasn't prepared to do was and st. completely my fault for thinking something else, the resolution that is being presented, what i thought i was going to

we're all clear item 6 madam clerk call the roll commissioner avalos supervisor breed no supervisor campos supervisor christensen no supervisor cowen no supervisor farrell no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener no supervisor yee there are 5 i's and 690s with supervisor breed supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor tang and supervisor wiener in the descent this ordinance fails colleagues seeing no other names on the roster members of the public can i please remove your sign can you please lower your signs thank you very much madam clerk on item no. 7 as amended can you please call the roll. >> supervisor avalos no supervisor breed supervisor campos no supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim no supervisor mar no supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no there are 6 i's and 5 nos with supervisor avalos supervisor campos supervisor kim and supervisor yee in the decendents. >> this ordinance is passed on see first reading m we're now past 2:30 can we go to the 2:30. accumulations with supervisor cowen. >> mada

campos, aye. christensen aye. cohen, aye. supervisor farrell, aye. supervisor kim, aye. supervisor mar, aye. supervisor tang, aye. 11 aye >> the ord nons is passedue nan unanimously. >> [inaudible] require calendars kept by elected officials and department heads include information about there identity of persons inattendance >> supervisor avalos >> thank you. colleagues i have a amendment for this ordinance that would trigger a first reading and have the second reading in july. i want to make sure we are clear about how we conduct our sharing our internal calendar for internal offices and offices of departments as well. i do know that we have many incidental meetings within the offices and office the city department offices that are very cumbersome and not necessary to say-some of the meetings happen that spur of the moment where conversation is held. the standing meetings we do have are the ones that are most important. i have a amendment, it is page 3 of the legislation in subsection e and starts on line 9. i'll read the whole section so it is clear. the obligations i

were taken off the market regardless of the number that was quoted in the chronicle as supervisor campos pointed out it is just good many unit that are taken off the housing stock i want to be clear this is not the cost of our house ways, and means committee many things contribute but a factor here because of the contra costa crisis we're facing and the completely lack of enforcement up to now of the existing laws we need a coherent and strong response first of all, i really want to thank the authors of both of the pieces of legislation we're taking a voted on to today i mean there is evidences that an existing law needs tweaking and i believe it will continue to need adjustments as we learn more and more about what works and what don't work as we move forward and i'm glad it is not just us in this chamber that are concerned about those things people are trying to find solutions people are trying to find balance and compromises and, in fact seems like some groups outside of this chamber are working harder to compromise more than we do in the chachldz for instance the merging home sharers