were here, so the canaanites were here in this neighborhood it means that even jews or even israelis not in these mountains at all. now what is their claim on this area ? their claim is that this area or the stone itself, of course , the stone is the same famous stone. well, the famous stone that the prophet came from ascended from there, and in the same neighborhood as the prophets. where is this stone after praying? the same dome, which is golden in color, well, now there are many shias, what do they say that this stone is in the air, not in the air at all, this stone is later said in arab countries that it has fallen because when pember went up to this stone, he asked for the love of the prophet, give it up. no, it's not a big deal at all this stone is on the ground, there is a cave under the stone. well , what do the jews say about this mosque ? solomon's temple is here. of course, the european jewish researchers who came and examined and went under the al-aqsa mosque since 1967, they could not find any document, and even what is the temple of solomon, the temple of solomon, the

the implicates and the canaanites and it's a war, right in the war would lead to their greatest sort of belief that the land would be theirs. the land flowing with milk and honey. now the myth, according to richard slotkin, who describ this in his book, gunfighter nation, he connects to the ncept regeneration through violence. and the myth represents this idea. they play through a scenario of separation, temporary regression to a primitive or an more natural state, and eventually leading to some kind of progress, state of progress. and that state progress will create a new of world or new utopia that the old utopia was beautiful as well, but it too died or ended. and a new one is born. and this sort of mythic cycle is one that is very much of the story. according to richard slotkin, the frontier myth. so there are stages right? and we see that these stages of the western are ones that are followed in the telling of the story of in cold. it starts with american pastoral landscape, right? the western plains of kansas. it their lives as idyllic. and when you read not just the opening bu

the implicates and the canaanites and it's a war, right in the war would lead to their greatest sort of belief that the land would be theirs. the land flowing with milk and honey. now the myth, according to richard slotkin, who describes this in his book, gunfighter nation, he connects to the concept regeneration through violence. and the myth represents this idea. they play through a scenario of separation, temporaryegssion to a primitive or an more natural state, and eventually leading to some kind of progress, state of progress. and that state progress will create a new of world or new utopia that the old utopia was beautiful as well, but it too died or ended. and a new one is born. and this sort of mythic cycle is one that is very much of the story. according to richard slotkin, the frontier myth. so there are stages right? and we see that these stages of the western are ones that are followed in the telling of the story of in cold. it starts with american pastoral landscape, right? the western plains of kansas. it their lives as idyllic. and when you read not just the opening bu