and so does generra canady-slade. "bring more kids out. bring more adults out. i would like to see more basketball courts." enter teen empowerment:"hi. my cameron.""logan allen." "christina adamski.""kamren williams." these seventh, eighth and ninth graders and their classmates at norwood middle school are taking on city hall.they plan to petition the mayor to bring back the hoops."i'm a person that likes to play sports.""we don't have other places to hang out at, so this is really the only way we can.""not many "they got on board with it and really started to work on creating how do we present this to our city in a way that they will listen to us and hear us.""teen empowerment!" tuesday they held a petition signing party in the gym. nat))"did you sign them?"young people pour in to have their names added to the list.nat sound.city officials say the hoops were taken down because they were constantly being broken and stolen.but these kids say basketball will give young people something positive to do and may actually cut down on crime. as well as equipping a new g

i think out of an abundance of caution, should never put it at 100% good i think supervisor canady raises some very good questions. how can you justify an 87% administrative fee? how can you justify an 80% administrative fee. and the answer is it's loaded up with all sorts of things i'm including the cost of those toes from individuals who had their car stolen. that do not appropriately responsibly along their. listen, this new contract, which nobody has an issue with relative to the operator, relative to the rfp, both of to the new way it is structured, which is as a management fee, why are we paying and subsidizing the cost of various mta staff when that is what the management fee is for. so, i question why a portion of the director of the mta's salary is being passed on to these individuals who get their cars towed to objectively, 87% administrative fee is usurious. we should all recognize that and delighted in the next week or 2 the mta will rethink this wrongheaded policy and bring those fees down for those unfortunate individuals for help have their cars towed. eject bt suburbia sup

pas it turns out daily run canady pcrease your chances of getting pcancer. pif you ever already had it pregular exercise can help keep presearch out of denmark has done phave done four separate have pbeen done four separate times. pit showed adrenaline along with pantiinflammatory gene that poccurs naturally helps attack ptumors in the body shrinking pthem. pamazing. pall right. pkey did drink a cocktail with pmud in it. pcoming up at 9, why this new pdrink is becoming so popular. pespecially for people who are preally stressed out. pyou know what they say here's pmud in your eye. pall right. pand boy is it a big day for psenator marco rubio. phe's joining us in about an pwe're going to ask him wha (donkey sound) (elephant sound) there's a big difference between making noise, (tapping sound) and making sense. (elephant sound) (donkey sound) when it comes to social security, we need more than lip service. our next president needs a real plan to keep social security strong. (elephant noise) hey candidates. enough talk. give us a plan. strength is an addiction.

the supervisors and i think you met with a couple of them but up until then we met with supervisor canady with the last one we have scheduled i think we have nine out of the 11 that we met with and we presented the budget package to them and universally they've all said we will support whatever you need. so, they seem sympathetic to the fact that the commission has not had a budget increase and they recognize that we need more resources to do what many of the supervisors agree we should be doing. so i'm thoroughly optimistic. turning to the next item, which is the approval of the minutes for >> i just want to make sure you want to make sure this opportunity for public comment >> i'm sorry. does anyone want to comment on the executive directors report other than to complement it? then, the discussion and approval of the commissions minutes for minutes for january 25, 2016 and there is very little minutes . any of the commissioners have any corrections? i had only one. i didn't quite understand but i guess on page 6, where it says a motion moves, seconded and no vote that the commissioner i

i think out of an abundance of caution, should never put it at 100% good i think supervisor canady raisessome very good questions. how can you justify an 87% administrative fee? how can you justify an 80% administrative fee. and the answer is it's loaded up with all sorts of things i'm including the cost of those toes from individuals who had their car stolen. that do not appropriately responsibly along their. listen, this new contract, which nobody has an issue with relative to the operator, relative to the rfp, both of to the new way it is structured, which is as a management fee, why are we paying and subsidizing the cost of various mta staff when that is what the management fee is for. so, i question why a portion of the director of the mta's salary is being passed on to these individuals who get their cars towed to objectively, 87% administrative fee is usurious. we should all recognize that and delighted in the next week or 2 the mta will rethink this wrongheaded policy and bring those fees down for those unfortunate individuals for help have their cars towed. eject bt suburbia supe

francisco weather was the mission, bernal heights, worse in my district saw the market or supervisor canady'sdistrict. this issue has been going on for years. it there really hasn't been a real substantive plan that provides services and housing for all people who need them. this failure has cost a public health emergency that recently her with respect to payments on a mission street went to the removal of those encampments.. as a supervisor, it's not like i woke up today and said we have an emergency. we, as members of this board, have been working on this issue for many years. throughout this time i've always tried to be a part of not just the criticism but the solution. when i talked to the mayor more than a year ago and talked about the possibility of partnering with him and his administration to open up the first navigation center, i did that with the hope that we could-that we could-come up with something that works and what is incredible but the navigation center as a concept is that the concept has actually proven to work. it is not a silver bullet, but it has demonstrated that if you

the supervisors and i think you met with a couple of them but up until then we met with supervisor canady with the last one we have scheduled i think we have nine out of the 11 that we met with and we presented the budget package to them and universally they've all said we will support whatever you need. so, they seem sympathetic to the fact that the commission has not had a budget increase and they recognize that we need more resources to do what many of the supervisors agree we should be doing. so i'm thoroughly optimistic. turning to the next item, which is the approval of the minutes for >> i just want to make sure you want to make sure this opportunity for public comment >> i'm sorry. does anyone want to comment on the executive directors report other than to complement it? then, the discussion and approval of the commissions minutes for minutes for january 25, 2016 and there is very little minutes . any of the commissioners have any corrections? i had only one. i didn't quite understand but i guess on page 6, where it says a motion moves, seconded and no vote that the commissioner i

i think out of an abundance of caution, should never put it at 100% good i think supervisor canady raisessome very good questions. how can you justify an 87% administrative fee? how can you justify an 80% administrative fee. and the answer is it's loaded up with all sorts of things i'm including the cost of those toes from individuals who had their car stolen. that do not appropriately responsibly along their. listen, this new contract, which nobody has an issue with relative to the operator, relative to the rfp, both of to the new wat

i think out of an abundance of caution, should never put it at 100% good i think supervisor canady raisessome very good questions. how can you justify an 87% administrative fee? how can you justify an 80% administrative fee. and the answer is it's loaded up with all sorts of things i'm including the cost of those toes from individuals who had their car stolen. that do not appropriately responsibly along their. listen, this new contract, which nobody has an issue with relative to the operator, relative to the rfp, both of to the new way it is structured, which is as a management fee, why are we paying and subsidizing the cost of various mta staff when that is what the management fee is for. so, i question why a portion of the director of the mta's salary is being passed on to these individuals who get their cars towed to objectively, 87% administrative fee is usurious. we should all recognize that and delighted in the next week or 2 the mta will rethink this wrongheaded policy and bring those fees down for those unfortunate individuals for help have their cars towed. eject bt suburbia supe

i think out of an abundance of caution, should never put it at 100% good i think supervisor canady raisessome very good questions. how can you justify an 87% administrative fee? how can you justify an 80% administrative fee. and the answer is it's loaded up with all sorts of things i'm including the cost of those toes from individuals who had their car stolen. that do not appropriately responsibly along their. listen, this new contract, which nobody has an issue with relative to the operator, relative to the rfp, both of to the new way it is structured, which is as a management fee, why are we paying and subsidizing the cost of various mta staff when that is what the management fee is for. so, i question why a portion of the director of the mta's salary is being passed on to these individuals who get their cars towed to objectively, 87% administrative fee is usurious. we should all recognize that and delighted in the next week or 2 the mta will rethink this wrongheaded policy and bring those fees down for those unfortunate individuals for help have their cars towed. eject bt suburbia supe

canady again, it could've been the fact that previous ones that went through cannot go to a hearing and therefore that was not taken into consideration. once they met the general requirement that no objections were filed with the afford within approval. so some of these are the ones most likely to not go to hearing and keep in mind a lot of these food trucks on this block, delete at least 3 of them, were approved prior to the new legislation. prior to the 2013 legislation, which set the limits on the restaurant, which set the limits on the restaurants locations and proximity to existing restaurants. >> okay. >> although, mr. shaw, we've heard for appeals on this block. food trucks, one handcart. admittedly, the first couple was under a different criteria of light foods was the predominant argument. it's interesting this block is has had that but you have confirmed that there are in an existing 5 permits for this block on that side? >> yes. on both sides of the block >> both sides? >> yes >> parlor with our standard on this? de novo? >> i have a question. what to policy, so, since the st

i think out of an abundance of caution, should never put it at 100% good i think supervisor canady raisesw can you justify an 87% administrative fee? how can you justify an 80% administrative fee. and the answer is it's loaded up with all sorts of things i'm including the cost of those toes from individuals who had their car stolen. that do not appropriately responsibly along their. listen, this new contract, which nobody has an issue with relative to the operator, relative to the rfp, both of to the new way it is structured, which is as a management fee, why are we paying and subsidizing the cost of various mta staff when that is what the management fee is for. so, i question why a portion of the director of the mta's salary is being passed on to these individuals who get their cars towed to objectively, 87% administrative fee is usurious. we should all recognize that and delighted in the next week or 2 the mta will rethink this wrongheaded policy and bring those fees down for those unfortunate individuals for help have their cars towed. eject bt suburbia supervisor yee >> there's been s

canady again, it could've been the fact that previous ones that went through cannot go to a hearing and therefore that was not taken into consideration. once they met the general requirement that no objections were filed with the afford within approval. so some of these are the ones most likely to not go to hearing and keep in mind a lot of these food trucks on this block, delete at least 3 of them, were approved prior to the new legislation. prior to the 2013 legislation, which set the limits on the restaurant, which set the limits on the restaurants locations and proximity to existing restaurants. >> okay. >> although, mr. shaw, we've heard for appeals on this block. food trucks, one handcart. admittedly, the first couple was under a different criteria of light foods was the predominant argument. it's interesting this block is has had that but you have confirmed that there are in an existing 5 permits for this block on that side? >> yes. on both sides of the block >> both sides? >> yes >> parlor with our standard on this? de novo? >> i have a question. what to policy, so, since the st

the supervisors and i think you met with a couple of them but up until then we met with supervisor canady with the last one we have scheduled i think we have nine out of the 11 that we met with and we presented the budget package to them and universally they've all said we will support whatever you need. so, they seem sympathetic to the fact that the commission has not had a budget increase and they recognize that we need more resources to do what many of the supervisors agree we should be doing. so i'm thoroughly optimistic. turning to the next item, which is the approval of the minutes for >> i just want to make sure you want to make sure this opportunity for public comment >> i'm sorry. does anyone want to comment on the executive directors report other than to complement it? then, the discussion and approval of the commissions minutes for minutes for january 25, 2016 and there is very little minutes . any of the commissioners have any corrections? i had only one. i didn't quite understand but i guess on page 6, where it says a motion moves, seconded and no vote that the commissioner i

the supervisors and i think you met with a couple of them but up until then we met with supervisor canady with the last one we have scheduled i think we have nine out of the 11 that we met with and we presented the budget package to them and universally they've all said we will support whatever you need. so, they seem sympathetic to the fact that the commission has not had a budget increase and they recognize that we need more resources to do what many of the supervisors agree we should be doing. so i'm thoroughly optimistic. turning to the next item, which is the approval of the minutes for >> i just want to make sure you want to make sure this opportunity for public comment >> i'm sorry. does anyone want to comment on the executive directors report other than to complement it? then, the discussion and approval of the commissions minutes for minutes for january 25, 2016 and there is very little minutes . any of the commissioners have any corrections? i had only one. i didn't quite understand but i guess on page 6, where it says a motion moves, seconded and no vote that the commissioner i