are talking bringing stability to the country but alan creepin president of france is new and capitalist party believes there is more to paris's decision to intervene your fourth fifth france used to pretext of human rights and in fact it was aimed at protecting its economic interests in the c.a.r. is rich in resources but it mostly has value due to its strategic location in the center of a vast and rich area so it's eventually all about dominating and controlling the entire region. but others see the african country central location on the continent as the key to fulfill the stated goals of the french military mission of securing the entire region. france and other european countries are threatened by islamic radical and terrorist groups that are now decentralized and developed in the belt from the mercian timi a coast to somalia. and french troops deter these dangerous forces and also prevent pirates and drug traffickers from uniting. but would both critics and advocates of the french military operation in the central african republic equally agree on is that no matter what the intentions ar

talking bringing stability to the country but alan krueger been president of france is new and capitalist party believes there is more to paris's decision to intervene that i was your for france used the pretext of human rights and in fact it was aimed at protecting its economic interests the c.a.r. is rich in resources but it mostly has value due to its strategic location in the center of a vast and rich area so it's eventually all about dominating and controlling the entire region. but i. others see the african country central location on the continent as the key to fulfill the stated goals of the french military mission of securing the entire region because. france and other european countries are threatened by islamic radical and terrorist groups that are now decentralized and developed in the belt from the mercian timi a coast to somalia and french troops deter these dangerous forces and also prevent pirates and drug traffickers from uniting. which would both critics and advocates of the french military operation in the central african republic equally agree on is that no matter what the i

you said i'm the capitalist party.tary where we've gotten to the point where we do need to look at fiscal and monetary policy. they can be forces for good but they can also be forces that can be sort of the -- that can hold back the system. it would be nice to know exactly what we're doing and how some of it's positive and how some of it's negative so we can do the right thing for everybody, to grow as quickly as we possibly can. >> i often times say if someone asked me to design a set of policies that were best designed to discourage economic growth in the united states, i could not have done a better job than the u.s. congress did. also at the time when businesses needed to plan for the future to have undisciplined spending. high quality, completely nonpartisan way, have somebody to talk about that. >> you picked guys from brookings because you know what the perception is. you even leaned some of it right. >> it's not bipartisan. it's nonpartisan. it's the best ideas and the best thinking. >> like me. >>> we'll talk

capitalistic system. nevertheless, the president and the democratic party have targeted american women as a group that needs help. >> women make up half our workforce. they still make up to 77 cents for every dollar a man earns. that is wrong. and, in 2014, it's an embarrassment. women deserve equal pay for equal work. it is time to do away with work place policies that belong in a mad man episode. >> but that's not exactly the case. here are the facts. in 1963, the equal pay act was passed into law so the feds can punish any american employer who discriminates against women in the pay arena. as for the 77% number, the president puts out there analysis shows that american women are really making about 91 cents on the dollar compared to what men earn. last august, the web site slate had an interesting analysis of the man/woman salary controversy. and it is worth reading. the article pointed out that men are more often in unions where the wage is guaranteed and they tend to go into higher paying professions. also, american men work more hours than american women. so all in all if you examine the facts, the fa

a definite openness for clear alternatives, not only to the big business parties, but the system they represent, the capitalistem. if you look at recent polls, they show people, especially young people, are much more open to socialism than you would find from the corporate media. people are also fed up with the .olitical dysfunction 60% of americans that they're looking for political candidate to democrats and republicans. everybody said, don't you have to vote for democrat or else the evil republicans will come in? that is correct. republicans and the right wing need to be defeated, but at the same time, it is important to recognize that the reason the right wing, the tea party and republicans, gain any sort of ascendancy over the american people is because the democrats do not present an alternative. the tea party arose because of obama's administration's failures to deal with the outrage against the bank bailouts. really, it is up to us to present a different way of doing that, to really show that working people can find for ourselves -- it is not simply about electoral politics. the elect world arena is on

if you don't have political parties, if you don't present the electorate with two -- and in most capitalistocracies of the kind we have got through western europe, you have a healthy society, you need a public sector and private sector, one party favors the private sector more, and there's a fight about how to draw the line. for the first time we have a group that denies the legitimate si of the public sector, and for awhile they were dominating the republican party. i said for some time, the most important thing going on in america today in politics is whether or not the mainstream conservatives are going to regain their party from the extremists. now, john boehner was very weak for a while. he does appear to be pushing back on this, and that would restore a healthier situation. i was very partisan in the sense that i articulated very firmly my values and try to find holes in there, wasn't hard from my standpoint, but you don't let it get personal. by the way, i was able in my last term to work with tea party people. there was a basis for cooperation between many of us on the very liberal

republicans like to portray themselves as the party of morality so why are some of the g.o.p. trying to help out tax evaders by capitalist money also a group of oakland raiders cheerleaders is suing the team over wage theft violations that claim of that organization owes them thousands of dollars in the back table practices workouts it's been a turning point for labor in sports and believe it or not a rand paul presidential run might be a great thing for the democratic party i'll tell you why do. you need to know this conservatives have a pretty bizarre understanding of morality they're fine with the super rich cheating the government out of tax revenue but they freak out about the idea of unwed mothers getting welfare benefits are excuses bill o'reilly for example recently told a guest on the show the food stamp dependency is pushing our country down cly. and is encouraging parasites to come out and you know take as much as they can with no remorse and this is how a country declines this is how we think of the coming week nation. attacks like that on food stamps or other government programs shouldn't be surprising for d

capitalistic. they have a lower unemployment rate than whites. they have a higher household income than whites. tend to be cult rattily conservative. wouldn't that kind of describe republicans. attributes one attribute to the republican party. yet romney lost the asian vote by 47 percentage points, three points more than he lost the the hispanic vote. that is really interesting to me. the vote for confess is almost identical. you say, wait a minute, nobody was talking about asian vote. how did that, the thing about it is, when you look at the polling, when you sit through focus groups with voters, the message that minority voters across the board are getting is the republican party doesn't like anybody that doesn't look like themselves. is that a fair characterization of all republicans? no, i don't think it is but that is the message that so many minority voters are getting and, and i think to me, what is happening with the asian vote is particularly symptommic of it. that has a lot less to do with immigration or anything else, is that republicans have an enormous problem with minority voters. and country is getting more and more, and more diverse. that romney won the 59% of the white vote in this last election. historica

capitalistic. a lower unemployment rate than whites. cairo household income. what that describes republicans. attributes that one was described as the republican party. mitt romney lost the asian vote by 47 percentage points, three points more than he lost the hispanic vote. that is really interesting to me. the vote for congress was almost identical. you say no one was talking about the asian vote. polling,look at the when you sit through focus group , the message with minority voters across the board are getting is the republican party does not seem to like anybody that does not look just like themselves. is that a fair characterization of all republicans? i do not think it is. that is the message so many are getting. what is happening with the asian vote is particularly symptomatic because it has a lot less to do with immigration or anything else. republicans have an enormous problem with minority voters, and the country is getting more .nd more diverse mitt romney won the 59% of the white vote in the last election. will -- iflay you you are a republican income 59% of the white vote, you just won the election. is no longer sufficient. what we see

capitalistic. a lower unemployment rate than household her economic then whit. cu ltural culturally conservative. wouldn't that describe epublics, attributes one would attribute to the republican party? yet romney lost the asian vote 47 percentage points, three lost the e than he hispanic vote. that is really, really interesting to me. congress was almost identify confidential -- identical. nobody was talking about asian vote. and the thing about it is when at the polling and sift through focus groups with that , the message minority voters across the board the republican party doesn't seem to like anybody that doesn't look just themselves. now, is that a fair characterization of all republicans? no, i don't think it is. but that is the message that so many minority voters are getting. and i think to me what is happening with the asian vote is particularly symptomic of it do with t has less to immigration, is that republicans have an enormous problem with voters and the country more and more and more diverse. romney won the 59% of the white last election. historically if you got 59% of you are vote republican and you got 59% of the white vote you have just won the election. longer s

capitalistic. lower unemployment rate than whites. higher household income. they tend to be culturally conservative. wouldn't that describe republicans? the attributes one would attribute to the republican party? and yet romney lost to the asian vote by 47 percentage points, three points more than the hispanic vote. that is really interesting to me. and the vote for congress was almost identical. you say, wait a minute. nobody was talking about asian voters. the thing about it is, when you look at the polling, when you sit through focus groups, the message minority voters across theboard are getting is republican party does not seem to like anybody that does not look like themselves. that a fair characterization? i do not think it is. but that is the message so many minority voters are getting and i think what is happening with the asian vote is symptomatic because that has a lot less to do with immigration or anything else. republicans have an enormous problem with minority voters and the country is getting more and more diverse. won the 59% of the white vote in this election. historically, -- if you got 59% of the white vote, you won the election. but it is no longer sufficient. an events a