and carbfix says that happens pretty quickly.ars. around about 95% of the c02 was mineralised here within two years in the pilot project. this is incredibly fast, geologically speaking. mammoth is climeworks' second commercial plant and almost ten times bigger than the last one, collecting 36,000 tonnes of c02 annually, about the same amount as taking 8,000 petrol cars off the road. but it costs a whopping $1,000 to remove just one tonne. what do we mean by removing emissions? among its customers are microsoft, h&m and lego. worldwide, more plants like these are on the way, though they'll still only remove a fraction of what's needed. and despite calls to slash our emissions, the c02 we churn out continues to grow. do you think direct air capture can be an effective tool for removing carbon? we release about a0 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year, so this won't make a dent into the big problem. but i think you should use all methods and methodologies to fight this problem. what's it going to take to scal

and carbfix says that happens pretty quickly. tens of thousands of years. around about 95% of the c02 was mineralised here within two years in the pilot project. this is incredibly fast, geologically speaking. mammoth is climeworks' second commercial plant and almost ten times bigger than the last one, collecting 36,000 tonnes of c02 annually, about the same amount as taking 8,000 petrol cars off the road. but it costs a whopping $1,000 to remove just one tonne. what do we mean by removing emissions? among its customers are microsoft, h&m and lego. worldwide, more plants like these are on the way, though they'll still only remove a fraction of what's needed. and despite calls to slash our emissions, the c02 we churn out continues to grow. do you think direct air capture can be an effective tool for removing carbon? we release about a0 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year, so this won't make a dent into the big problem. but i think you should use all methods and methodologies to fight this problem. what's

and carbfix says that happens pretty quickly. ten times bigger than the last one, collecting 36,000 tonnes of c02 annually, about the same amount as taking 8,000 petrol cars off the road. but it costs a whopping $1,000 to remove just one tonne. what do we mean by removing emissions? among its customers are microsoft, h&m and lego. worldwide, more plants like these are on the way, though they'll still only remove a fraction of what's needed. and despite calls to slash our emissions, the c02 we churn out continues to grow. do you think direct air capture can be an effective tool for removing carbon? we release about a0 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year, so this won't make a dent into the big problem. but i think you should use all methods and methodologies to fight this problem. what's it going to take to scale it up, bring costs down and make it really impactful? by the end of the decade, we want to be at a cost of capture of $300—400. technology improvements will help drive down costs. a second [ever w