this is my name that i'm on the number of sheets of carbon removal expert and joe carbon market watch. it's green washing out a titus. another open question with directly or capture is what happens once the c o 2 is captured. the plastic line works as running already and check the c o 2 into bethel trucks or volcanic rocks and the company. it says it will not engage and enhanced oil recovery for ox is plant plants. it's not entirely clear how much will be sequestered away and how much will be used to extract more oil of our produce synthetic fuel. there are some comments in the price, for instance, of the q one of the c o saying that this capture that if you sort permit the underground, i do nothing with it. it's actually a waste of a valuable products. she's also said that this is a means to legitimize oil and gas operations. this is what take, you holler, puts a say in a video that the american petroleum institute post sit on x. if we do it, why is it a are headed down assigned to do or cried, then our industry will be around the 16. so the 80 years. there's a lot to say that there'

a little bit of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is great because carbon dioxide is really, really good at absorbing and radiating the heat that gets reflected from the surface. it's what makes our planet warm enough to live on. but we're taking a little bit too far with all of this. we're blowing more of this stuff into the air almost every year. the only 2 dips you can see here, the 2009 financial crisis and the curve at 19 pandemic. not exactly intentional and pretty catastrophic as a carbon tax ideally would change that makes things that pollute a lot more expensive so that people will buy or use less of it. and then time this will make clean if acknowledge is cheaper and more attractive. it's so appealing because it seems so simple and logical, it drives the lowest cost ways of reducing emissions. simon, to do the works for the canadian government. it's how the form of federal carbon tax since 2019 and it just sort of sends abroad signal to the marketplace that pollution shouldn't be free. and then it kind of lets all of the actors decide for themselves how best that works in their

ways to tax carbon emissions. you could tax the entire economy or just a specific fixed up. some taxes, only target companies of a certain size. a lot of the carbon taxes worldwide taxes on fossil fuels. that means fossil fuel firms must pay for every leto cubic meter of oil, gas, and coal they extract. but in many cases, the additional cost is passed onto the consumer, incentivizing them to use less of it. the next question is what to do with all the money you just collected. one way is to reduce other taxes in sweden. one is called this the green tax shift. this is christy on to him on he advised the swedish government on tax policies for 10 years. one, use an increase in environmental succession to reduce the taxes on labor. that would be considered to be a growth enhancing reform. switzerland uses 2 thirds of its revenue to reduce health insurance and social security payments and invest the rest into low emission effect as canada takes it one step further. revenue, we collect from that federal fuel charge, the

that's what the 1st type of carbon capture we're looking at. the dfcs or carbon capture and storage sucks up a portion of this you to release that a fossil fuel plan. then companies can transport that c o 2 l square to stored away by injecting it into rocks into the c bed or into old oil fields, which ironically helps extract more oil. but more on that later, this technology has been used for a few decades now. but there's also 2nd option, direct the air capture or deck which in comparison a full baby tech here giant fans suck in air and pass it through a filter or through chemicals to trap c o 2 particles. these can be collected and stored under ground. so basically it target c o 2 that's already in the atmosphere . so imagine a spoon with which you can take a tiny bit of water out of the best of interest. stop this back from overflowing. we need to, to develop, come, remove the solutions, talk climate experts agree, but capturing carbon directly from smoke stacks and removing it from the dispute is essential to help us become climate neutral

so can the carbon tax stop us from polluting? but 1st things 1st, why are we focusing on carbon? that's because as soon as we've done this, it becomes the biggest trouble amaica. when you band co dom it's vast amounts of c o 2. the same goes for oil and gas. carbon emissions from fossil fuels are by far the biggest pollutant that's responsible for climate change. this is regular air and this is what we're doing to atmosphere right now. and once we turn on our son, this one starts heating up much quicker. a little bit of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is great because carbon dioxide is really, really good at absorbing and radiating the heat that gets reflected from the surface. it's what makes our planet warm enough to live on. but we're taking a little bit too far with all of this. we're blowing more of this stuff into the air almost every year. the only 2 dips you can see here, the 2009 financial crisis and the curve at 19 pandemic. not exactly intentional and pretty catastrophic as a carbon tax ideally would change that makes things that polluted a lot more expensive so that

the cost of carbon capture has gone down. it's pretty hard to pinpoint what exactly the price of capturing carbon is. the range is pretty big because it depends on the nature of the project and what the source of emission says. but it's about 15 to a $120.00 per metric ton that it's captured. just for reference, a ton of c o 2 is one passenger and it's on a flight from new york to paris. so multiply the price by the billions of tons we will have to capture for this tech to be effective. one way technology is good, cheaper is to scale them, but that's really hard with cps plants which have complex designs, i need to be customize. that's because there are a lot of variables. what type of fossil fuel plant is that? where is the c o 2 going to be stored? our company is going to get into that storage side. they can just be mass produced cookie cutter style for some and some steel production where there are few alternatives, carbon capture and storage might actually still be one of the better options for now. so when it comes to se

and so as a carbon tax and alluringly simple, i do just put the price tag on carbon emissions that are destroying our planet, the more you pollute, the more you pay, leading and theory to less pollution. making clean alternatives more appealing. almost 30 countries worldwide have a form of it. so can the common tax stop us from polluting? but 1st things 1st, why are we focusing on carbon? that's because as soon as we've done this, it becomes the biggest trouble amaica. when you band co dom it's vast amounts of c o 2, the same goes for oil and gas. carbon emissions from fossil fuels are by far the biggest pollutant that's responsible for climate change. this is regular air and this is what we're doing throughout atmosphere right now. and once we turn on our son, this one's thoughts heating up, much quicker. a little bit of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is great because carbon dioxide is really, really good at absorbing and radiating the heat that gets reflected from the surface. it's what makes our planet warm enough to live on. but we're taking it a little bit too far with all of th

four years any carbon renewal space -- in the carbon renewal -- removal space. the whole field is very young. two years income we have raised over one billion dollars from strike, alphabet, j.p. morgan, etc.. we continue to raise money on the demand side. on the supply side, we have contracted over $320 million dollars so far, profit for companies, and we have good leading indicators that frontier is doing a good job that we designed it to do. we ran an anonymous survey last year and we have had 71% of our portfolio companies say we play a critical role in them starting a company. 94% so we greatly accelerated their progress. we did not ask who they were. these are good leading indicators. it will take time to play out. i think we have done a reasonably good job in that context. we have seen a lot more push and pull funding emerge as a result, partially as a result of frontier. many other buyers increasingly getting into the space. governments are increasingly interested. that is not to attribute it entirely to frontier but i think more signal on the demand side

four years any carbon renewal space -- in the carbon renewal -- removal space. the whole field is very young. two years income we have raised over one billion dollars from strike, alphabet, j.p. morgan, etc.. we continue to raise money on the demand side. on the supply side, we have contracted over $320 million dollars so far, profit for companies, and we have good leading indicators that frontier is doing a good job that we designed it to do. we ran an anonymous survey last year and we have had 71% of our portfolio companies say we play a critical role in them starting a company. 94% so we greatly accelerated their progress. we did not ask who they were. these are good leading indicators. it will take time to play out. i think we have done a reasonably good job in that context. we have seen a lot more push and pull funding emerge as a result, partially as a result of frontier. many other buyers increasingly getting into the space. governments are increasingly interested. that is not to attribute it entirely to frontier but i think more signal on the demand side

the insidiousness of carbon monoxide is that when carbon monoxide is inhaled, this substance immediatelyn bloodstream. when carbon monoxide and hemoglobin interact , carboxymoglobin is formed, which prevents the transport of oxygen in the human body. as a result, a person experiences oxygen starvation, that is, hypoxia. even if the carbon monoxide in the air is 20 times less, then, for example, miners are evacuated from the mine, because everyone will be laid up with poisoning for a long time, in the usa, and this happens regularly, which is trumpeted in unbiased news, only it happens not with miners, but with butchers. at a meat packing factory, employees were poisoned by carbon monoxide and this is not a one-time incident, just yesterday the same thing happened at another enterprise. and at a college in illinois, during dinner , carbon monoxide detectors went off, and no, the students didn't burn the chicken. one of them. just opened a package of beef, look, the numbers on the device are going off the charts, but in this case it turned out that the dish was sent to the student by his p

there are three ways to price carbon. one is the direct carbon tax. the other is cap in trade which is an implied tax. the third is the regulatory cost of complying with regulations which reduce carbon. that is what we do. like i said, since 1988, we have lowered our carbon emissions in the united states both because of natural gas replacing coal, marginally it is renewables. more importantly it is a regulatory environment encouraging the adoption of natural gas and not coal. there is a cost to that that is quantifiable and that can be the basis of a carbon fee. domestic carbon pricing, getting technical and i apologize for doing this. there are two aspects to carbon. one is when you use carbon-based fuels for gasoline. there is already a gasoline tax that is effectively a carbon tax. the other is utilities or industrial. if you tax that carbon, who pays it? it is a woman in maine who cannot afford her heating oil. it is a poor person in louisiana -- >> [cross-talk] >> i understand your rationale. >> china has a really easy way to lower the amount we

this question is targeted at action about carbon. about carbon. do you see the you use steps towards a carbon border adjustment mechanism as a first tentative step toward a global on carbon that will deliver the economics that are needed. yeah, it's a very good question. so as was making the point that, you know, if climate change has been the biggest failure, correcting it would be to put a price on pollution. if you ask an economist, that would be ideal for the global price of carbon around the world and people will start to pay a price for polluting and then start to move towards getting things that the reality of carbon price globally is, that it's politically hard because what happens is it makes things expensive at least in the short term and nobody likes taxes but the european version of it has been very interesting. so the way the europeans started is they created an emissions trading system only affected a certain set. industries in. the in the bloc and so you had power then later on they added steel and cement to it. now they're going to

the trucks are nearly carbon neutral during operation. but for the driver, recharging on the road is still the most important issue. after all, he also wants to make it home. a speedy recharge requires a high voltage current and heavy duty chargers. then it takes just 20 minutes to go from 20 to 80 percent capacity, but there still are nearly enough of these megawatt charging system. and i'm hoping that we need a large scale public charging infrastructure. the manufacturers are ready. they are building a lot of vehicles also in series production position, but in terms of infrastructure, we have a lot of catching up to deal on it and i'm not trucks. home base is in southwestern germany. they're the world's largest commercial vehicle manufacturer. here on the test track, the truck is being put through its paces. several 100 experts spent 8 years developing it. as far as the project manager. okay, we're going to break quickly. careful. hang on. the truck retails for about 250000 bureaus over 800000 euros more than a comparable diesel model.

carbon monoxide is released after burning fuels. c.o.sonings are on the rise amid widespread power outages following widespread weather events. the devastation this summer's hurricane beryl had on increasing the number of carbon monoxide poisonings texas. lexie, what is the link between the use of generators and the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning? >> thanks so much for having me. this link is something that the consumer product safety commission has been studying for decades so we know a lot about what we know now. in the time they've been studying this connection they've found that generators actually lead to about 70 deaths every year, which makes portable generators one of the most dangerous de vices that consumers can buy on the market today. in fact, the commission haas found that no other de vice has killed as many people from carbon monoxide poisoning as portable generators have. the reason why they're so dangerous is because these sometimes very small de vices, just one can emit as much carbon monoxide gas as hundredings of ca

and where carbon is stored. and how it moves between these reservoirs has a massive on global climate and the planet has an innate ability to pull itself back from extremes. if it enters an deep freeze or an extreme hothouse state. and life has been entwined with that ability and amplifying certain aspects it for a very long time. so, you know, these these what revelations are really showing us is, you know, as earth system scientist tim lenton has written, whereas the changes that the planet went through and then the of life were seen parallel but largely separate processes now earth system scientists recognized these as a single integral process. they're happening all together as one evolutionary process. and to me, that seems, you know, a, you know, profound requiring substantial revision to modern evolutionary theory and something that hadn't really permeated public as a science. right? i'm always thinking about what is familiar, not familiar to the general public and kinds of ideas seem to me that, you know

and the roots exude carbon into the soil. you are helping turn a farm into a carbon sink. it is an international model. delegations from 135 countries have come to study this program. and it actually helped inspire a new law in california, senate bill 1383. which requires cities in california to reduce the amount of compostable materials they send to landfills by 75% by 2025. and san francisco helped inspire this and this is a nation-leading policy. >> because we have such an immature relationship with nature and the natural cycles and the carbon cycles, government does have to step in and protect the commons, which is soil, ocean, foryes, sir, and so forth. -- forest, and so fors. we know that our largest corporations are a significant percentage of carbon emission, and that the corporate community has significant role to play in reducing carbon emissions. unfortunately, we have no idea and no requirement that they disclose anything about the carbon footprint, the core operation and sp360 stands for the basic notion that large corporations should be transparent about the

it's pulling carbon dioxide out of the air, combining and essentially recreating that calcium carbonate that you started with so they can heat this back up, pull out the carbon dioxide and start the process all over again. the catch to it is that susan brantley is a geochemist at penn state university, and explained that this process requires energy in this case, heimdall is using fossil gas instead of wind or solar, making the grains that they put out that cost energy. burning off the co2. that cost energy. and then, you know, getting the co2 down into the ground costs energy. so basically it's a tax. you know, and the whole process that's producing the co2 in the first place. it is energy intensive. but those combustion gases will be sequestered. but it's a good starting point. i like psychology a lot. and there's this nirvana fallacy where you try to perfect things too much, right. it's there's no point in doing it unless it's going to be perfect. this is an imperfect solution, but we will continuously chase perfection from here on. but this is also a way to do this big and do this n

and the roots exude carbon into the soil. you are helping turn a farm into a carbon sink. it is an international model. delegations from 135 countries have come to study this program. and it actually helped inspire a new law in california, senate bill 1383. which requires cities in california to reduce the amount of compostable materials they send to landfills by 75% by 2025. and san francisco helped inspire this and this is a nation-leading policy. >> because we have such an immature relationship with nature and the natural cycles and the carbon cycles, government does have to step in and protect the commons, which is soil, ocean, foryes, sir, and so forth. -- forest, and so fors. we know that our largest corporations are a significant percentage of carbon emission, and that the corporate community has significant role to play in reducing carbon emissions. unfortunately, we have no idea and no requirement that they disclose anything about the carbon footprint, the core operation and sp360 stands for the basic notion that large corporations should be transparent about the

pulling carbon fthe soil where it belongs. and roots exude carbon into the soil.helping turnarm into a carbon sink. it is an international model. delegations from 135 countries have come to study this program. and it actually hlped inspire a new law in california, senate l 1383. which requires cties in california to reduce the amount of compostable materials they send to landfills by 75% by and san francisco helped inspire this and this is a nation-leading >> because we have such an immature relatsh nature and the natural cycles and the carbon cycles, government does have to step in is soil, ocean, foryes, sir, and so forth. -- forest, and so fors. we know that our largest corporations are a significant percentage of carbon emission, and th the corporate community has significant role to p reducing carbon emissions. unfortunately, we have n and no requirement that they d anhing about the operation and sp360 stands for the basic notion large corporations should be transparent about the carbon footprint. it all the sense in the world and very common sense but any ti

be at least borrows worked of the carbon footprints of 20 billionaires in 2018. got to work and what we have we have to work with them doing is who, who's lifestyle is glamorize, who often appear in the media, who show a show off their yards. their private jets back meant they ignored some of the richest people in asia. but in europe in the us, they found plenty of material to keep them busy. take romano brockovich, a russian oligarch, steel magnate and former football club owner. here's 162 meter long yard has 2 hello pads and kind of unnecessarily for the boat to swimming pools. powering this single ship with diesel mix up the bulk of his colossal carbon footprint. how about microsoft founder bill gates? he's a billionaire who at least gets the problem avoiding a climate disaster. so we need green cement, green steel to bring the missions from all those areas down to 0. gates has written an entire book about avoiding climate disaster tend to is credit. she doesn't own a mega yet, but bill gates flew around the world through these private jets so often that in 2

she has disgain for the people of carbon county.he's addressed it twice on the order and it's reprehensible. rep. wild:ny actions have always been supporti of carbon county residents. >> we have time for one more question but i'm going to ask that you each both ask a question and there will be no rebuttal. ben steprich? >> we all know that politics is a game of compromise. yes are some specific areas that you would be willing to compromise? ryan: as state representative, i've had an opportunity to put that on display. i'll give the example of e-verify. i would expand it for lots of other industries but the particular problem that we were facing from both union and non-union stakeholders with us in the construction agency. they had talked about illegal immigrants coming up from maryland and the southern parts of new jersey taking away american jobs, reducing american wages. in the effort of bipartisan compromise because we had agreement on that issue, i offered that legislation to tackle illegal immigration in the construction indust

the sf carbon fund for us has been the launching pad for an entire program here at the pomeroy center. we received about $15,000. the money was really designed to help us improve our garden by buying plants and material and also some infrastructure like a drip system for plants. we have wine barrels that we repurposed to collect rain water. we actually had removed over 1,000 square feet of concrete so that we could expand the garden. this is where our participants, they come to learn about gardening. they learn about our work in the greenhouse. we have plants that we actually harvest, and eggs from our chickens that we take up and use in cooking classes so that our participants learn as much as anybody else where food comes from. we have two kitchens here at the pomeroy center. one is more of a commercial kitchen and one is more setup like a home kitchen would be, and in the home kitchen, we do a lot of cooking classes, how to make lasagna, how to comsome eggs, so this grant that we received has tremendous value, not only for our center, for our participants, but the entire community.

supreme court decided in 2020, for the bio diversity protection kind of outcome at the expense of carbon neutral energy production. the cold of a ton, the earlier ruling to allow overhead power lines for renewable energy projects. we have to move to green energy, which is solar and wind and all of this. and therefore, we cannot have such a large area for conservation of the no d i, b is protected not only on the y lit protection act. it is also under the conventional migratory species as well as conventional biological diversity. and no one can point out with the ad, not talking about are not concerned about the will being lost in the space space of the nature fall from the courthouse debates. shepherds like kitchen sing, must find ways to e count and living on rapidly shrinking gross lands the conquered. i'm not. i used to be able to let my sheep grace anyway a bit, but now the solar power plants have been installed. there was sense is everywhere with the set up so we can no longer leave. fine blonde gray is on a ship, it i as mold. ross, land is diverted for renewable energy production