. >> carl lockhart, graduated university of virginia school of law. you don't seem to be a big fan of judges or the majority. you seem to see a tyranny of majorities working. i want to see what your thoughts are. one is the role of elected judges which takes place in many states, and the second is a role of federalism which we have here which didn't get touched on, and the deceleration of power and how that allows for majorities at smaller levels to make decisions for localities rather than a marginal majority marginalizing 40% of the population, as in the case of brexit. >> well, we don't have elected judges in the united kingdom, and i'm not aware of any other country which does have them. personally, i find the idea of people standing for a lecture on the basis of their own program would be, very unsatisfying. your point about federalism. yes, federalism does have the advantage that it enables smaller units to make decisions and, therefore, it emits a greater variety. it made no difference is the one that you mentioned, namely brexit. it would not