carl whitman wrote in his gay manifesto that marriage is a prime example of ace -- of a straight institution fought with role-playing. a contract which smothers old people, places impossible demands on those people. gaugingle must stop their self-respect by how well they mimic straight marriages. he goes onto say the game liberation can offer new w about seeking relationship. we are all looking for a feeling of belonging and being needed, but these needs can be met through a variety of living conditions. it seems we need to get away exclusiveness, property attitudes toward each other, a mutual pack against the rest of the world. thes rebelling against notion of monogamy and lifetime thinking about your spouse as your property, or someone you have control over or own. he says we need to get away from promise about the future, which we have no right to make, and which prevents us from or makes us feel guilty about growing. this is more of the groovy language of the day. we should not promise relationships into the future because we are going to grow, expand and explore new horizons. let's not

during this kind of revolutionary moment of gay politics in the late 1960's and early 1970's, carl whitman, and activist in san francisco, wrote in his gay manifesto that marriage is a prime example of a straight institution fought with role-playing. traditional marriages the run, oppressive institution, a contract which smothers both people, denies needs, and places impossible demands on those people. gay people must stop gauging their self-respect by how well they mimic straight marriages. he goes on to suggest that they liberation -- that gay liberation can offer new ways of seeking about relationship. he says we are all looking for a feeling of belonging and being needed, but these needs can be met through a variety of living conditions and social relationships. things we need to get away from, he says, r, one, exclusiveness, property attitudes toward each other, a mutual pack against the rest of the world. so he is rebelling against the notion of monogamy and lifetime exclusivity or thinking about your spouse as your property, or someone you have control over or own. he says we need t

meg whitman, ceos have weighed in on the election, but there's a huge group of private ceos who prefer to work and donate behind the scenes. kate kelly has details on that. hey, kate. >> hey, carl's definitely true some well known names have spoken out on behalf of hillary clinton and fewer perhaps have advocated publicly for donald trump, but when it comes to the big money donors, we got a lower profile roster on both sides of the aisle than usual this cycle. take a look at some of the givers top five in dollar terms in terms of their support for either candidate, according to totals from the center for responsive politics. fairly known quantities, but donald sussman is number three with $32 million to democratic causes, a big chunk having gone to priorities usa, the clinton-supporting super pac. part of his object is to get the money out of politics in a bipartisan way. bob mercer gave much to ted cruz, but this summer he and his politically active daughter rebecca pivoted to donald trump, helping shake up their campaign staffing, as well as donating millions to the candidate. mercer, a mathematician and co-ceo rarely speaks publicly. in fact, during a 2014 award acceptance s