SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
16
16
Jun 4, 2020
06/20
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 16
favorite 0
quote 0
by the way, i just wanted to thank you, carmello, for all of your hard work on these mlus. section j, discussion and vote on consent calendar, items removed at previous meeting and there are none tonight. section k, introduction of proposals and assignment to committee. one public and comment on proposals and two -- a motion to 6.1.4, if needed. now. >> so moved. >> ok, any public comment on this item. >> there is none. >> any board comment to this first reading. it doesn't look like it. >> i just had a question and it doesn't need to be followed up. i wanted to know how this is different than -- i'm assuming that it's an amendment or revised revision and it would be great to find out what's different. >> mr. sanchez, did you want me to address that now or follow up separately? >> follow up separately, unless other commissioners are interested. >> i would be interested. >> go ahead. >> so this item is actually memorialized in our current student hanbook. therhandbook.it includes languaa and one thing, we have noticed over the years that many of the items that should be boar
by the way, i just wanted to thank you, carmello, for all of your hard work on these mlus. section j, discussion and vote on consent calendar, items removed at previous meeting and there are none tonight. section k, introduction of proposals and assignment to committee. one public and comment on proposals and two -- a motion to 6.1.4, if needed. now. >> so moved. >> ok, any public comment on this item. >> there is none. >> any board comment to this first reading. it...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
61
61
Jun 11, 2020
06/20
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 61
favorite 0
quote 0
by the way, i just wanted to thank you, carmello, for all of your hard work on these mlus.ection j, discussion and vote on consent calendar, items removed at previous meeting and there are none tonight. section k, introduction of proposals and assignment to committee. one public and comment on proposals and two -- a motion to 6.1.4, if needed. now. >> so moved. >> ok, any public comment on this item. >> there is none. >> any board comment to this first reading. it doesn't look like it. >> i just had a question and it doesn't need to be followed up. i wanted to know how this is different than -- i'm assuming that it's an amendment or revised revision and it would be great to find out what's different. >> mr. sanchez, did you want me to address that now or follow up separately? >> follow up separately, unless other commissioners are interested. >> i would be interested. >> go ahead. >> so this item is actually memorialized in our current student hanbook. therhandbook.it includes languaa and one thing, we have noticed over the years that many of the items that should be board
by the way, i just wanted to thank you, carmello, for all of your hard work on these mlus.ection j, discussion and vote on consent calendar, items removed at previous meeting and there are none tonight. section k, introduction of proposals and assignment to committee. one public and comment on proposals and two -- a motion to 6.1.4, if needed. now. >> so moved. >> ok, any public comment on this item. >> there is none. >> any board comment to this first reading. it...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
57
57
Jun 13, 2020
06/20
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 57
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> carmello, is that possible without having to go back. >> why well, it's funny, it's in all of our contracts and so we would have to go back and i would have to check in with all of our labor partners to ensure that they were ok with it. so it's not something i could agree to right now, but it's something that is in there contracts. >> ok. >> it's a title. in principle, i don't think they'll argue with it, but it is something -- >> it's really, really important. >> i understand. >> -- to our community. and we were in the process of getting a resolution that we didn't pass and in some cases, it hasn't been addressed. >> yeah, i can meet and confer -- we can schedule a meet and confer with the units to talk about maybe that adjustment and we can get back to the board. >> i just recall us changing several years ago indigenous people's day had somehow disappeared from the calendar and then the board at that meeting added it back. >> i'll check in with council just to make sure what i'm saying is true and we certainly don't want to make any road block. i understand completely. >> is it
. >> carmello, is that possible without having to go back. >> why well, it's funny, it's in all of our contracts and so we would have to go back and i would have to check in with all of our labor partners to ensure that they were ok with it. so it's not something i could agree to right now, but it's something that is in there contracts. >> ok. >> it's a title. in principle, i don't think they'll argue with it, but it is something -- >> it's really, really...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
42
42
Jun 25, 2020
06/20
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> carmello, is that possible without having to go back. >> why well, it's funny, it's in all of our contracts and so we would have to go back and i would have to check in with all of our labor partners to ensure that they were ok with it. so it's not something i could agree to right now, but it's something that is in there contracts. >> ok. >> it's a title. in principle, i don't think they'll argue with it, but it is something -- >> it's really, really important. >> i understand. >> -- to our community. and we were in the process of getting a resolution that we didn't pass and in some cases, it hasn't been addressed. >> yeah, i can meet and confer -- we can schedule a meet and confer with the units to talk about maybe that adjustment and we can get back to the board. >> i just recall us changing several years ago indigenous people's day had somehow disappeared from the calendar and then the board at that meeting added it back. >> i'll check in with council just to make sure what i'm saying is true and we certainly don't want to make any road block. i understand completely. >> is it
. >> carmello, is that possible without having to go back. >> why well, it's funny, it's in all of our contracts and so we would have to go back and i would have to check in with all of our labor partners to ensure that they were ok with it. so it's not something i could agree to right now, but it's something that is in there contracts. >> ok. >> it's a title. in principle, i don't think they'll argue with it, but it is something -- >> it's really, really...