interesting materials appear, right now in the guardian newspaper, chivis, a representative of the carnegie foundationrganization undesirable in russia, suddenly wrote a column where he says: listen, well, we see what zelensky is doing, yes, step by step he is trying to drag us in directly.

interesting materials appear, now in the guardian newspaper chivis, a representative of the carnegie foundation, an organization undesirable in russia, suddenly wrote a column where he says: listen, well, we see what zelensky is doing, yes, he is step by step trying to directly drag the united states of america into a war with russia, this is not hides. nobody sees it all, well, in the end, someone can curb him like he curbs his friends, he writes, well, purely in american style, you need to curb your friends, like they've gotten completely out of hand, you need to have sobchak as your friends, he was taught, well, because you can somehow immediately curb in this sense, no, well, you can well rein in, i translated it after all, that is, sobchak just doesn't leave your head, in this connection, yes... stir in this connection, of course, the appearance of such publications is curious, well, and a lot is being written about it now ugledar, you won't believe it, for some reason i remember how much they read about artemovsky bakhmut, yes - they wrote much less about avdiivka, although it is such a v

association which has its own history of discrimination against black physicians, they and the carnegie foundation commissioned abraham fleshner to assess american and canadian schools and hold them against the criteria of western schools and in the u.s., johns hopkins. what that report did was compared hbcus -- at the time there were seven in existence which i trained 1500 students. mind you, they did not have the same endowments. it compared them against white institutions in terms of admissions criteria. in terms of what laboratory facilities look like. so it was looking at predominantly white medical schools as well. what happened was they left behind at howard, it's estimated that that school remained open. when i heard that number in 2020, it was an article and i thought about all of the patients who could have been cared for. all of the students who could have been meant toward and the potential lost as a result of the schools closing. they were comparing them against predominantly white institutions. but i wonder what would've happened if they had endowments. host: black americans makeup 1

association which has its own history of discrimination against black physicians, they and the carnegie foundation commissioned abraham fleshner to assess american and canadian schools and hold them against the criteria of western schools and in the u.s., johns hopkins. what that report did was compared hbcus -- at the time there were seven in existence which i trained 1500 students. mind you, they did not have the same endowments. it compared them against white institutions in terms of admissions criteria. in terms of what laboratory facilities look like. so it was looking at predominantly white medical schools as well. what happened was they left behind at howard, it's estimated that that school remained open. when i heard that number in 2020, it was an article and i thought about all of the patients who could have been cared for. all of the students who could have been meant toward and the potential lost as a result of the schools closing. they were comparing them against predominantly white institutions. but i wonder what would've happened if they had endowments. host: black americans makeup 1

association which has its own history of discrimination against black physicians, they and the carnegie foundation commissioned abraham fleshner to assess american and canadian schools and hold them against the criteria of western schools and in the u.s., johns hopkins. what that report did was compared hbcus -- at the time there were seven in existence which i trained 1500 students. mind you, they did not have the same endowments. it compared them against white institutions in terms of admissions criteria. in terms of what laboratory facilities look like. so it was looking at predominantly white medical schools as well. what happened was they left behind at howard, it's estimated that that school remained open. when i heard that number in 2020, it was an article and i thought about all of the patients who could have been cared for. all of the students who could have been meant toward and the potential lost as a result of the schools closing. they were comparing them against predominantly white institutions. but i wonder what would've happened if they had endowments. host: black americans makeup 1

they, and the carnegie foundation and education specialists to assess all hundred 55 u.s. hold them against the criteria of western european at medical schools and in the u.s. johns hopkins medical school. trained about 1500en students. but, it compared them and they did not have the resources or the same endowment but predominantly white institutions in terms of admissions criteria. in terms of the percentage of physicians on faculty with the laboratory facilities look like. predominately white medical schools as well. but, what happened was five out of seven of those medical schools leaving behind howard and meharry. it's estimated this five medical schools had remained open it would've trained between 25,035,000 black physicians. and, when i heard that number in 2028mb article in the journal of the american medical association which was ironically i thought about all the patients that could have been cured for by those physicians for thought about the students and trainees that could have been matured. i thought about all of the brain potential that was a lost as a resu

we want to thank the carnegie corporation of new york who has been a long time supporter of this since the beginning. also the ford foundation, the uua project as founding this year -- for funding this year. where are we? we asked the standard question if we are heading in the right direction or wrong direction. we will count three levels and give you a sense of where people think we are. in the country it is pretty dark out there. it is only democrats who are a majority saying we are headed in the right direction. independence bank to 29%. report -- independents down to 29%. republicans at 6%. in the local community the pattern still holds but the numbers go up. about half of republicans say things are going in the right direction. they are divided. independents and democrats at 7%. there is my personal life and hear the partisan split goes away. most americans think in my personal life things are going in the right direction. that tells you a little bit about how to read those big numbers, it is more complex a picture in the top numbers often tell you. another question along these lines, this is been a standard question. w

we want to thank the carnegie corporation of new york who has been a long time supporter of this since the beginning. also the ford foundationoject as founding this year -- for funding this year. where are we? we asked the standard question if we are heading in the right direction or wrong direction. we will count three levels and give you a sense of where people think we are. in the country it is pretty dark out there. it is only democrats who are a majority saying we are headed in the right direction. independence bank to 29%. report -- independents down to 29%. republicans at 6%. in the local community the pattern still holds but the numbers go up. about half of republicans say things are going in the right direction. they are divided. independents and democrats at 7%. there is my personal life and hear the partisan split goes away. most americans think in my personal life things are going in the right direction. that tells you a little bit about how to read those big numbers, it is more complex a picture in the top numbers often tell you. another question along these lines, this is been a standard question. we first aske