>> 15 years ago or so, i went to carnegie melon computer science school, which had a special programto bring in and retain women, and the number of women in computer sciences since then has dropped. i mean, to m this is thene field where it's still really bad for women. and i don't know what is going on. i don't think it's just that women don't want to be in that field. >> well, i don't think they don't want to be in it. i'm looking at it from the perspective of what are the people within the threshold of working with these young women doing? not so much we need to have more legislation to make it happen. where are the teachers, administrators, principals, the parents who should be advocating for their children? i grew up in south bronx and new york city, i went to public school. but i had mentors from first grade. my parents, up who encouraged me to do what i wanted to do and i became an attorney. i think, unfortunately, we have a generation of kids who aren't getting that structure that they need and that's important at home. so it's a multi-facetted issue. but i don't think legisl

we have had interactive courses like carnegie melon. is there some breakthrough? in a technology sense there isn't some dramatic breakthrough. what's being done that's very exciting is they are taking three elements. really great video lectures with the interactivity built into those lectures. at ten-minute intervals you're tested on the concepts and you cement those. that's the beauty of great video lectures. the third thing they do is they get a lot of people often as many as 100,000 taking the course at the same time. they have lots of peer education going on where people are answering questions, looking at each other's homework, giving advice and then the teaching staff is reviewing all of that activity to make sure it's high quality and students aren't being misled. a fourth piece is probably more challenging and that is how does this connect up to degrees or accreditation that employers will value. they are giving out certificates but not fully endorsed degrees. that's an area where there will be some evolution. this is a very important movement. you all nee

increased 18% for women and 24% for men between 1983 and 2009, this according to researchers at carnegie melony. some good news here, the study says stress decreases with age. what does that mean? >> i'm zen. >> you're zen? >> totally zen. >> i dispute that, everyone. >> what? >> i dispute that. >> this is your stress, it's just distorting your opinion. >> i'm going to take that one home and think about that. thank you, john king. >> stay right here. kate is going to stay right here. tonight's moments you may have missed. an epic tennis temper tantrum. david nalbandian wasn't pleased with his performance and he snapped. kicked an ad board which hit a line judge in the shin. the bloody judge got an apology but babhe's paying the price. >>> and webb simpson takes the title at the u.s. open but a bold fan tries to take his glory. >> i got off to a slow start but i knew that -- >> always something to spice matters up. >> yeah, enjoy the jail cell, pal.

if that, i mean, look at the catalogs and the vanderbilt and the carnegies and the melons on the rockefellers. the suit will have enormous amounts of money and nobody has any money. you can't have a system like that. that doesn't work. you need to have an overarching government that collects the money and redistributes the wild in the way that he sees fit. in other words, the united states of america was responsible for socialism because we were the ones to inspire them to do that. but you know, they made one miscalculation. they have found that those names i just mentioned are like the rich people and their nation who just accumulated wealth into themselves and passes down from generation to generation. but all those things i just mentioned poured enormous amount of wealth back into infrastructure into building factories, textile mills, created an environment that then spurred on the most prolific middle class the world had ever seen. they also created foundations, charitable organizations, schools, hospitals. that has been the nature of wealth in america. and to test nine, 40 of the wealthi

if that, i mean, look at the catalogs and the vanderbilt and the carnegies and the melons on the rockefellers. the suit will have enormous amounts of money and nobody has any money. you can't have a system like that. that doesn't work. you need to have an overarching government that collects the money and redistributes the wild in the way that he sees fit. in other words, the united states of america was responsible for socialism because we were the ones to inspire them to do that. but you know, they made one miscalculation. they have found that those names i just mentioned are like the rich people and their nation who just accumulated wealth into themselves and passes down from generation to generation. but all those things i just mentioned poured enormous amount of wealth back into infrastructure into building factories, textile mills, created an environment that then spurred on the most prolific middle class the world had ever seen. they also created foundations, charitable organizations, schools, hospitals. that has been the nature of wealth in america. and to test nine, 40 of the wealthi

if that, i mean, look at the catalogs and the vanderbilt and the carnegies and the melons on the rockefellers. the suit will have enormous amounts of money and nobody has any money. you can't have a system like that. that doesn't work. you need to have an overarching government that collects the money and redistributes the wild in the way that he sees fit. in other words, the united states of america was responsible for socialism because we were the ones to inspire them to do that. but you know, they made one miscalculation. they have found that those names i just mentioned are like the rich people and their nation who just accumulated wealth into themselves and passes down from generation to generation. but all those things i just mentioned poured enormous amount of wealth back into infrastructure into building factories, textile mills, created an environment that then spurred on the most prolific middle class the world had ever seen. they also created foundations, charitable organizations, schools, hospitals. that has been the nature of wealth in america. and to test nine, 40 of the wealthi