why were cartwright king to be kept apprised of civil claims? so many unanswered questions. paragraph 209 of the post office written submissions where we are talking about the engagement with the cc rc. and that paragraph 209, the post office says this... subsequent letters to the cc rc were drafted by womble von dickinson, including a holding response on the 24th ofjuly and the substantive response on the 26th ofjuly setting out the proposed course of action, brian altman's review, the safety of the convictions and when cases are identified, where there may be issues over the safety to determine the proper approach to be taken. you know that they dispense with the issues over the safety. you know, because the post office tells you in its next line, neither of these drafts refer to any issue with garethjenkins. there is no evidence, the post office says, that this was at the request of the post office rather than at the instigation of womble von dickinson. this is desperate stuff, it is reasonable, playing the limits of the evidence. there is no evidence this was done at the