we will now hear from mister casey randolph. casey rando, please go ahead. one moment.casey rando, please go ahead. okay, we will go back to the caller. >> caller: can you hear me? my name is casey rando, good evening. i'mnext-door neighbor to the developer and i live at 4302 17 . i submitted a written opposition to the appeal to you on behalf of myself and my husband and i'm here to reenter that opposition and underscore myargument . first it's not clear why we're even here. the developer really hasn't shown to me why or shown to us why he's met the standard of review. as i stated in my email he hasn't shown that there's extraordinary circumstances that exist and re-hearing his meant to prevent manifest injusticeor different circumstances that have arisen . i just am not sure what he thinks you all need to review. second, the developer has not shown why he qualifies for a variance . i won't go into it because i do believe mister t stole my thunder so i appreciate his concise and excellent testimony tonight. third, the developer has marketed this project for a very long

we will now hear from mister casey randolph. casey rando, please go ahead. one moment.mise. even when the planning commission instructed him to develop a code compliance project he refused. my hope is that the board upholds the decision of the planning commission, zoning administrator and supports the decision of over 200+ neighbors ofthe developer who said no to this proposed development . thank you very much for hearing me and i appreciate your time. >> we will hearfrom the caller without a phone number showing . press start 6. you unmute it yourself, please go ahead. >>. >> caller: my name is sonia renner and i live on the same block as the subject property. i'm calling to oppose this appeal. the zoning administrator was right in denying the variance applications because they do not meet requirements. they would result in re-zoning and would also create two substandard lots. if all the variances were granted in our neighborhoods, most likely because they met the proper criteria. without looking at thiscontext it makes no sense to establish any precedent . more than 2