but castille, who used to be the head of the state supreme court, said she could release these e-mails if she wants to. her office says she's preparing a request. if she puts in that request, i would imagine they'll say, "fine, go ahead." >> right. >> what happens next? so, fine, she can release the e-mails, which she's been asked to do repeatedly by press outlets and has not done. >> and she has released some of them. she has done that. >> eight. eight names. >> months ago. right? >> yeah. >> and one of them being former justice mccaffery... >> mm-hmm. >> ...and others who lost their jobs. >> right. >> so, again, there's no consistency in the argument, because, first of all, she's saying she can't do something that she clearly can do, and has done. it just doesn't make any sense. >> and even the press conference, as i watched it, i just found the whole thing to be bizarre. her tone, intonation, the things she was saying. and even the statement that we just heard seemed to write the title for a book that has never been written. so, she kind of wanted, i believe, to cast herself as a vi