it is illegal category -- a legal category. having that said, i think it is inevitable that people are drawn to and concern about this debate. i think there is room for academic research. i think we have relatively little empirical knowledge about how important these words actually are. do people react differently when you talk about slavery versus trafficking? i am sure that there are pulling groups -- polling groups -- who is pulling -- polling this >? ? how can this message to be better conveyed? clearly there is rhetorical important in defining slavery. there is room for research on the question of how important it is to determine, are there other ways -- how does the kremlin of this defect -- the framing of this affect others? whether it be potential victims who may be in danger of being trafficked, and may not have other alternatives, but may be informed, to a least some degree, about how to choose among the options given to them with fuller awareness of the consequences that may result. encouraging community norms to cha

on an annual basis, we are able to flexibly assign cash flow across the three categories. in that instance, allow us to front load programming of street resurfacing project. our recommendation is consistent with voter mandate to use prop double a to fund projects. our application to prioritization criteria put emphasis on projects design and construction in the first two years. that means this current fiscal year and '13 and '14. in september, i described a number of recommended and not recommended projects within each the categories. i won't go into every project today, i do want to spend time on the retainment and the programming we've made. this has been the changes in refinements have been based on communication. there are also three special conditions included in today's action. these are all on the slide presented now. dpw initial application for this project included repaving work on 9th street and brian to 8th to 11th. dpw staff informed us the brian street segment will need two repairs. the schedule for this work is to be determined and dpw staff anticipate fundin

no. 4, celeb establishing pricing category. no. 5 change the status of projects using the california debt limit allocation committee. i will talk about the cdlac units. no. 6, allow income levels of qualifying households to exceed those specified in recorded use restrictions under certain circumstances and lastly, authorize the mayor's office of housing to charge a monitoring fee to verify occupancy for affordable rental units where that authority has not been explicit in the past. those are the seven changes, and the mayor's office of housing is here to help you if you have questions on those. as you know, this ordinance was introduced on december 6th, so i want to point out that the version of the ordinance that you have in your packet was prior to when i had the signed form ordinance. we have the signed form ordinance before you now. there are no substantive changes, but we didn't have this at the time that the packet was produced. we are recommending approval of the ordinance. it's in line with adopted city policy both in o

in that income category it's above where our publicly subsidized affordable housing can hit. this is the program that frankly produces housing for the middle-class, who are not able to reach the market. it's impressive over the life of the program. i think you heard a lot of numbers, 1200 units,. that is a good track record. as you all know the housing trust fund was a big package. and within that, and i think really smartly, we don't see it as a giveaway, but we see it as a very intentional and thoughtful policy. it incents on-site bmr to the developer for exchange to producing units, bricks and mortar, permanently affordable housing and developers are rewarded for that. so we should see an increase in the number of bmrs because of that. there is also a piece of trailing legislation that will come before you presumably in the 1st quarter of next year. we think it's a smart idea to make sure that the program is as successful as possible. the idea is to allow more of a range of pricing both of the rental and for-sale, up to a cap, dealing with the low and moderate income categ

the one little property in green within the extended conservation district that is article 11 category one through four building and everything in yellow is formally list the on the state or national register. to be clear these are the properties that are listed or designated. obviously there are many properties within the planned area that potentially could be designated or listed if they went forward with that process but that's basically what we have existing in the planned area today. this map -- these are going to build off each other so the same properties in the existing map are here, but this shows all of the buildings within the planned area that are individually eligible for the state or national register, and that adds more properties to the potential pool to take advantage of these land use controls, but it's important to know that they're properties individually eligible. they're not contributors to a particular district. on their own merit they're eligible for the state or national register. this last map is basically all the properties that are eligible for the state or

this is a whole category but that's the one in the study. if you found this is true, the newer drug will claim it's an improvement or suggested an improvement, plus the impact of the advertising programs and the solicitation of doctors from brands? i don't want to -- we're not here to fault brand drugs and we'll explain that in a minute. but, there is no advertising for the drugs that we're talking about here. the generic drugs. >> very little promotion of generic drugs to consumers or doctors. >> because when the brand drugs goes off patent, you get a variety of generic companies. it's per missibility and for all genarks to eer the competition, correct? >> for the first 6 months, the first generic manufacturer to challenge the patent has exclusivity for 6 months. this is very important because this was created by the hatch wax man act in 1984. and it creates a 6 month exexclusivity for the first generic company because we want judge nark companies to come into the market. after 6 months, the generic drug goes from being a monopoly product t

pricing both of the rental and for-sale, up to a cap, dealing with the low and moderate income categories and then basically vary the number of units that are required, according to the pricing. so you are still getting the same obligation in terms of cost, but you are allowing more variety of the pricing. again, smart stuff. just to conclude, the inclusionary housing program is an essential part of your housing policy and we're glad to seing that the mayor's office of housing putting in the effort and thank you folks as well. >> thank you. any additional public comment? seeing none, commissioner antonini? >> mr. cowan spoke precisely of what i brought up on a number of instances and that is why i wasn't supportive, because i wasn't really clear on levels. this level that could float in certain instances say for example you brought the ami to 120-140 percentile, but you have to produce a higher percentage because your subsidy is less. so therefore, you begin to address the middle-class, because you get a couple of city employees, particularly if they are in public safety, and they are way

the next category, the biggest political turning point this year.e we were just talking about a moment aeg. the opening created for mitt romney in that first debate in october when barack obama's poor showing gave romney true momentum. was it that bipartisan show of support from chris christie to barack obama after new jersey got decimated in the hurricane? was it the romney campaign getting caught in a lie with that last-minute jeep ad in ohio? mike was talking about a moment ago as well. just when he, romney, was narrowing the race in that key state. or was the biggest turning point the unemployment number? finally dipping under 8%, motte before the election? helene. >> all of those are g i'll go with chris christie. just because i think for pure political theater, that was a match. saw two politicians at both -- at that moment in time, they needed each other. and chris christie figured out that president obama was about to win. he's governor of new jersey. this is a democratic state. he wants to win re-election. and you can see at that point romn

chris: our next category, worst moments of the campaign year. clint eastwood's empty chair number, mitt romney's disastrous overseas trip to london, suggesting that the brits weren't up to hosting the olympics. next, it was the uproar when the white house went to war with the catholic bishops by insisting religious organizations cover employees for contraception and barack obama's frozen performance in the first debate? >> i'm going with london. i was there at the time and it was not only the worst moment for mitt romney but the best moment for boris johnson, the mayor of london, when he came out with that fantastic line, "i hear there's some guy named mitt romney." >> i think it was the olympics, too, because it knocked 10 or 12 days out of his campaign, no one in his campaign wanted to go and he went for a show horse. >> he didn't watch the show horse. >> that would have killed his campaign early. if he had gone for greco-roman wrestling. >> why did the show horse hurt? >> it's a high-end, rich people sport. chris: and he had a horse in the ra

in categories because it gives us at least an illusion of some sense of control. i would like to know a lot more about him in terms of his personality, about his criminal history, about his diagnosis, about his relationships. when we think risk and violence we think about three sets of factors, individual risk factors, environmental risk factors and situational triggers. and we've heard the possibility his mother was about to commit him to the hospital. and i've had a number of cases in which people who were paranoid for many years suddenly turn on the family member, often their mother, because they believe the mother has now gone over to the other side and has joined the conspiracy against them. >> you know, it's -- i made the point earlier, it's -- i'm not sure any answer will prove satisfactory here. a lot of people speculating, as you say. but i really appreciate your insights, to the extent people who suffer with mental illness, again, not saying he necessarily had it. but we don't want people to be stigmatized and we want to make sure factual information is

. >> it is that in the past, the one category as being -- in sonoma for the last you know 20 years is that there is a very narrow pro vision that says in the s or and s o i for the space of a design profession profile that you are in 3,000 feed and above. that the -- office space. the issue is that it's a very narrow scope of office types so, that does not get used there may be a number of existing legal design professionals scattered throughout western sonoma. we are -- done in the past but may be didn't use that pro vision i have never seen it used at all because's from time to timive it's 3,000 feet or less and so technically that type of space cannot be permitted now in what is being proposed in this valley that proposition would go away and so again. the valley is not a seemly a pd r district but it is seemly a pd r district does it makes it a concept and a lot of the buildings and historic building crops the pd r districts don't get those because they are created to protect that, those pd r uses and other similar uses. >> is there a perceived problem in continuing that pro visio

liz: what categories are growing? the ones that really look healthy? >> sure.o there's, you know, footwear, accessories, handbag, things like that, a good example. liz: purses. >> exactly. liz: i don't know. it's a thing with women. we love brand new bag every fourth season, okay, every second season. okay. footwear specifically, look at what's in your fund, and we've got a whole bunch of names here, but here's some stocks up there. is it more the athletic footwear, off price, or we have seen that some of the boots out there are not doing as well. i don't know if you own ugg, but it's not doing wonderfully. is there a specific, a sub sector here? >> well, speaking of footwear, certainly areas of athletic and fashion. boots have been doing well in general, but consumer tastes can change, and it really comes down to individual brands and styles that are resinating with consumers. liz: let's go with the retailer areas that you feel are price sensitive that might not necessarily do as well in 2013. >> sure. absolutely. well, if you look at the kind of moderate leve

i was really upset about the category. >> jimmy: let's take a look here.ape of it. >> jimmy: the idea is you get a category. you can get under 18. 18 to 24. >> or 25 to 100. >> jimmy: let's take a look at l.a.'s getting of the news. >> hi, l.a. >> you have some good news for me, right? >> you will be mentoring the over 25s. >> the what? >> the over 25s. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: now that, i have to say -- being one of the over 25 singers, seeing that's got to make them feel great. >> i didn't lnecessarily know wo the over 25s were. it was the category. i spent my entire year developing kids. usher at 14. bieber at 14. all the artists i worked with are kids. even rihanna was 17. ciara was 16. you give me somebody that's 40, i don't know what to do. >> what you did do is you brought justin bieber in to mentor them, which has got to be weird for somebody. >> i thought going into it, okay, i'm going to get one of these young categories. i'm going to be the cool guy. i'm going to bring justin bieber, right? so i get bieber to do it and then i find out the category

like i don't really fit in the categories, you know, as far as age.m considered very healthy. i never drank, or smoked cigarettes, never been near a drug. you know what i mean? and i take a lot of pride in that. so you know, all of those things, i'm 125 pounds. i run three miles a day. i lift weights. i do everything i can to live a life -- a healthy life-style. but you know, it definitely is a wake-up call. like you know -- when you're young, when it is you, you feel like you are invincible, almost, you hear about all of these things that people can have and things that happen. even car accidents, when it is yourself, i mean me, i feel invincible. but now it makes me go, oh wait. this is my body. i need to take care of it. i need to do whatever i can to stay healthy. i want to live to be a very you know, old man. and you know, hopefully this is not a sign of things to come. you know, and hopefully i can -- you know, get on top of it now and whatever -- find out what it is, and i won't have it again. >> yeah, and we all hope that. but i think what you

we try to never subject ifl judge categories. we have open rules as long as your records are quantifiable and breakable and you have media evidence, we welcome it on to our site. >> which is why they have some really out-there records on the site. one of the most competitive categories. the most time smiling while listens to the song "beat it." and the tallest pizza tower jumped over. and the day i went to visit the company, two records were set in their office. sean mcdaniel did the most bear knuckle push-ups in one minute with 100 pounds on his back. and kyle peterson created the record for the most catches while juggling three clubs, hula hoop willing and riding a unicycle. since it is a crowd source site, if record setter gets something wrong, they hear it. last year, they mistakenly confirmed the world's largest pie fight. within a day, somebody had left a comment that said, here is a link to a youtube video that shows a larger pie fight. we reached out to the larger group and we changed our ruling. >> record setter started

so, looking at how we treat -- even if we choose to call out that category in a separate manner, i just think we need to figure it out because, you know, and actually put [speaker not understood] when it gets to the supervisors, they have as much information as possible. but, yeah, that's the other thing, i don't want us to not forget about the lessons we've learned in the past. and i guess i also would say 3b as i recalled was the best -- was the best option because it offered a daytime and a nighttime use. and then i guess it would have required the 11th street project to be grandfathered because of that. so, but again, i would prefer to figure out whether or not that project still needs grandfathering or if it's a bigger problem. >> commissioner hillis. >> a question on the 11th street project. i'm also supportive of 3b, but is that project grandfathered in, then, under 3b? i thought not. >> no. there is no grandfathering of any project. >> but it wouldn't be allowed under 3b? >> right. it won be permitted under the wmuo zoning. >> can you tell us more about that project, like how ma

let's go through the categories. walking wounded and anybody tha follows directions and get up and walk and it's green. d is delayed and anybody that i injured but we don't think it's life-threatening. i is the people that need treatment right now and d is th dead and black and during triag you open an air way and how lon does that take? two seconds and it takes ten seconds to check and bleeding - the only bleeding i want you to treat during triage are arteria bleeding and spurting out and you could bleed to death in about three minutes and shock and if the person is unconsciou on the chair and how do i treat for shock? lay down and lift the feet and cover you and takes ten -15 seconds and i move on. the categories, black for peopl that are dead and green people that are walking and the only two categories left are red and yellow. this rule here that i'm going t teach you now and i want you to memorize it and this is the rul that is going to determine whether you're red or you're yellow. the rule is 32 can do. i want

in order to prescribe the amounts of bicycle parking for each of these unit categories, staff compared each use category to comparable cities and overall, we thought to get bicycle parking for 5% of trips generated for each use. here are a few examples of before-and-after requirements. so for example, for a grocery store of 30,000-square-feet, which is the size of like a whole foods, right now class 1 or 2 combined -- but the new requirements will make it to full class 1 and 12 class 2 spaces. for a restaurant of 2500-square-feet, existing requirements doesn't require any bicycle parking. and our proposal will require 2 class 1 and 3 class 2. and the same with medical clinics and office buildings there will be increases. and also a separation of class 1 and class 2. our proposal guides the location of bicycle parking for indoor spaces and we would incentivize bicycle parking as an active use. bicycle parking on the ground floor is considered active year so long as the space as direct access from the sidewalk and visible also from the sidewalk. and it would also limit the combined lobby

i don't fit into those categorying as far as age. mean i'm very -- i consider myself very healthy. i've never drank in my life. i've never smoked a cigarette or been near a drug, you know what i mean? i take a lot of pride in that. so, you know, all of those things, i'm 125 pounds, i run three miles a day, i lift weights. i do everything i can to live a life -- ahealthy lifestyle, but, you know, it's definitely a "wake-up call." you know, when you're young -- when it's you, you feel invincible almost, you know what i mean? you don't think that anything you -- you hear about all these things that people can have and things that happen. i mean even car accidents and stuff. when it's yourself, i mean me, i feel invincible. but now it make mess go, oh wait. this is my body. i need to take care of it. i need do whatever i can to stay healthy. i want to live to be a very, you know, old man and, you know, hopefully this isn't the sign of things to come and hopefully i can, you know, get on top of it now and find out what it is and i won't h

there are two categories of homelessness. this is on the end of been able to afford to live in san francisco. that live paycheck to paycheck. when they do not get that next paycheck, they could be homeless the next week on that level, we need to continue to support economic development, support job creation, small businesses, the act would create 60% to 70% of the jobs in san francisco. we need to push legislation white -- like local hire, which is supervisor avalos's legislation. we demand that companies hire folks from our city. that is one end. we have to do what we can use to subsidize other essential services, whether it is transportation or public health, so people can afford to live in the city. then you have another category of homelessness, which is chronic homelessness. it is not just living paycheck to paycheck, but other issues like mental health or drug addiction. that is a much harder population to address. i think -- the district that i represent as many of the community organizations. it continues to be a pres

and it's this particular category of weapon which the bushmaster is. it's a killer weapon. you can fire it very quickly. it has very little recoil, very little kick, and it's very high velocity. and it doesn't belong on the streets of our city. and it doesn't belong in a place where a 20-year-old like this particular 20-year-old could get ahold of it and go in and do what he did. and this makes me very angry.

who gets the most category? taking into account mortgage size and income. borrows in hawaii and washington, d.c. get the greatest benefit. from 3 to 5%.

"party time" is the category. a recent social trend, "dadchelor parties," are events thrown for men who are about to what? graduate from college, buy a home, have a baby, retire from a job. "dadchelor parties." >> "dadchelor parties." well, if you go to a bachelor party, it would be for a man who's about to get married, so a dadchelor party logically would be for a man who's about to have a baby. i will guess "c" that's my final answer. meredith: it made total sense. you're right. it is have a baby. all right, we're gonna start building the bank. let's get a big chunk of change in there. how much is behind this question? >> yes! [cheers and applause] not bad at all. meredith: $25,000. we're gonna be back with more "millionaire" right after this. meredith: welcome back to "millionaire." it's "double your money" week, and that "double money" question is actually your next question, john kucjaz from chicago, illinois. your last question certainly paid off because there was $25,000 behind it. you were off to a slow st

third category, regulation. this is a category where progress has been mixed. to be sure we have half a million data published unjaded.gov. many are machine-readable, but the most important information isn't published and has not moved towards getting it published. let's take for example a national regulatory information. as many of you know, the securities and exchange commission requires companies to file in a format for the first time financial statements are machine-readable, the sec has not moved to take any other information they require and that they put in a machine-readable format. the sec has 600 different forms and submission types. the tagging, although it's great, only applies to two out of the 600 forms. the administration hasn't taken steps to encourage agencies to adopt more tagging such as asking the sec to extend to everything else. those are the most important categories. out into judicial documents later on. i've got one suggestion for why this hasn't happened. publishing the most data is very hard. it requires a lot of people to change thei

there was no such thing as somebody in that category. george moscone, philip burton, represented that which we all now richly enjoy. george went on to become a state senator. and in that capacity, scott, it was george moscone who shepherded the bill that removed criminal penalties between consenting adults in this state that cost people their positions as teachers, as doctors, as nurses, as lawyers in those days. it was a bill that we orchestrated together. and george did what has never been done since, and that is cause the senate to hookup in a 20 to 20 tie in the late dimely was flown in from colorado to break the tie to give us that bill. that set the stage, scott, for all the things that have occurred in this state, and ultimately in this nation on the issue. i must tell you that george moscone was extraordinary. (applause) >> and then george decided he wanted to be the mayor of his city. and believe me, it was a ball having george as mayor of this city. mr. mayor, i never had so much fun. [laughter] >> as i did with george, enjoyin

this is now considered a legitimate category and people who suffer from it are treated appropriately. and one of the reasons it is a legitimate category is because in addition to having a good clinical definition we are beginning to have some biological markers of it. we know a little bit about the genetics. so we know from imaging experiments this of what we will discuss here that there are three areas in particular that are involved in post traumatic stress disorder. the a mig delia, the prefrontal cortex which regulates the amigdila and the hypocampus. and hypocampus is shut off in part by post traumatic stress disorder. and that is thought to account for some of the misplacements of memory and distortions of memory that occurs. also there is evidence for genetic participation in this. if you have an identical twin that has post traumatic stress disorder the likelihood of you getting post traumatic stress disorder is much greater than if you had a twin who is not identical. post traumatic stress disorder doesn't simply occur as a result of war. it also occurs in civilian life. and

345-2550 operating expenses tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 in their respective tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 lipper categories-800-345-2550 lower than spdr tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and even lower than vanguard. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 that means with schwab, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 your portfolio has tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 a better chance to grow. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and you can trade all our etfs online, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 commission-free, from your schwab account. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 so let's talk about saving money, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 with schwab etfs. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 schwab etfs now have the lowest operating expenses tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 in their respective lipper categories. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 call 1-800-4schwab tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 or visit schwab.com tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 to open an account today. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 funding is easy tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 with schwab mobile deposit. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 investors should consider tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 carefully information d#: 1-800-345-2550 contained in the prospectus, d#: 1-800-345-2550 clud

345-2550 operating expenses tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 in their respective tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 lipper categoriestdd#: 1-800-345-2550 lower than spdr tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and even lower than vanguard. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 that means with schwab, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 your portfolio has tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 a better chance to grow. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and you can trade all our etfs online, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 commission-free, from your schwab account. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 so let's talk about saving money, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 with schwab etfs. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 schwab etfs now have the lowest operating expenses tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 in their respective lipper categories. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 call 1-800-4schwab tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 or visit schwab.com tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 to open an account today. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 funding is easy tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 with schwab mobile deposit. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 investors should consider tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 carefully information d#: 1-800-345-2550 contained in the prospectus, d#: 1-800-345-25