catherine: thank you for underscoring that. juanita: we also know black, brown students, students and low income areas, the urban areas don't -- have never had and will debate,ve experiencing a classroom debate, mock trials come any of these wonderful things that we know create critical thinkers. or help create critical thinkers. in terms of supporting a teacher , i know i took on a lot more than i could handle a lot of times, trying to make sure my students had access to and were exposed to as much as possible during that time they were with me. i wish i could have done more. that is a struggle. if you're a teacher you are here for a reason. you mean well, and you want to do the best, but we often simply do not have the capacity to do it. is criticalt for us in order to keep moving civic education into what we want it to look like, to ensure that we do have future active citizens. catherine: such an important point. scott: the last thing, ensuring that we are listening to the students and student voices are omnipresent in these conversations. ensuring that we a

i will invite my colleague, catherine brown and the panel to come to the stage. thank you. >> [applause] >> thank you so much. >> wonderful. thank you all so much for being with us this morning to discuss this important issue. my name is catherine brown, the vice president for education policy at the center for american progress. we will dive right in. we will do a different format where i will not introduce the panelist at the outset. a shorti will give introduction. this is stephanie sanford, the chief of global policy at the college board. she is also the author of "the civic life in the information age: politics, technology, and generation x." the former director of policy and advocacy for the united states program of the bill and linda gates foundation. a deep expert in this topic. i want to start with some level setting. can you tell us about the difference between civics and history? >> thank you so much. it is wonderful to be here. this is an issue near and dear to my heart. a goodht the senator did job at delineating the difference. history is what happe

at the movie, catherine brown is afraid of being put in jail. onh she and the times relied the same source. is that the correct original principle? you can't be stopped from publishing before the fact, but you can be punished after the fact. why didn't the administration try to punish after the fact? do you believe the natural right section of the first amendment would -- >> that is a good question of whether the first amendment would permit terminal prosecution of someone for disclosing national security secrets. that is not something decided by the pentagon papers case. it is interesting to see this case came up on a superfast track. two weeks away from the publication of the pentagon papers to the time it is decided. the supreme court does it in rapidfire fashion. i cannot believe a law professor is not seen that movie about the supreme court case. [laughter] there is a range of opinions from the first amendment to the absolutists that say government cannot restrict whatever the whateverublishes -- the press publishes. to justice brennan, who

catherine brown is worried about being put in jail for conspiracy. both she and the times relate on the same source. mike, is that the correct principle. if so, why didn't the nixon administration tried to punish after-the-fact? you believe that the natural rights edition of the first amendment would prohibit publication even after-the-fact. >> that is a really tough question of whether the first amendment would permit criminal prosecution for publishing the disclosure of a national security secret. that is not something that is decided by the pentagon papers case. this case came up on a super fast track. i think it was two weeks from the beginning of the publication of the pentagon papers to the time it is decided by the sprinkler. the supreme court does it in rapidfire fashion. the movie captures this wonderfully. i can't believe a lot of professor has counted see a movie about a supreme court case. >> kids at home. >> tape it, they will love it. opinionsis a range of that say, government cannot restrict whatever the press publishes. says,nnan's op

in the movie,catherine brown is worried about being put in jail for conspiracy because both she and the times relied on the same source . mike, is that the correct written principle? you can't be stopped from publishing before the fact but you can be stopped from publishing after-the-fact. why didn't the nixon administration tried to stop them from publishing after-the-fact or do you believe the national rights and would prohibit publishing after-the-fact? >> that's a tough question. whether the first amendment would permit criminal prosecution of someone from publishing the disclosure of national security secrets. that's not something decided by the pentagon papers case. this case came up on a super fast track, two weeks from the beginning of the publication of the pentagon papers. the supreme court does it in rapidfire fashion.the movie captures this wonderful -- i can't believe a law professor hasn't gone and seen a movie about a supreme court case. >> there's a range of opinions from the first amendment absolutists that say government cannot restrict whatever the press clause. to br

browning refuses to remove the yelp post... saying we have the right to free speech. (( áá v.o. / catherine áá )) it's an american fast food classicmcdonalds says, don't worry the happy meal is actually going to get better. (steve) say goodbye to mcdonalds' cheeseburger happy meal-- mc-donalds has vowed to make healthier options for children. the fast food giant announced today... it will make some changes to improve its happy meal menu. mcdonalds says it will "offer more balanced meals, simplify ingredients, and continue to be transparent with happy meal nutrition information."(catherine) as part of its plan -- cheeseburgers will only be available if requested. ...and the small-sized french fries will be replaced with kids-sized fries in the six-piece chicken mc-nugget meal. bottled water will be added as a featured beverage choice-- with a cookie that has less sugar. it will also be availale only on request. . by june... the happy meal combinations will be 600 calories or less. (steve) want to be happy and successful? try compassion. a study shows if you are looking for ways to be happier and make deeper connections with the peo

brown. this depresses support for social safety net programs like welfare. recent ethno graphic research by catherine cramer support this is finding. her multiyear study of whites in wisconsin show that white residents of that state felt deep resentment towards the government. in large part because they believe the government spending didn't go to people like them and that it instead disproportionately benefitted other people. undeserving people who do not work hard and who live in cities. these people are again envisioned as being black. largely. so the economic anxiety that was often discussed in 2016 is not in competition with that it was largely about race, but many white americans do feel as though they are forgotten people. and that made them right for a figure like donald trump who promised redemption and restoration of their status in society. so the second example of how facts and references comes a research that shows the idea that blacks are disproportionately involved in and incarcerated for crime reinforces existing prejudice and can actually encourage support amongst whites for more sen

catherine) canada's prime minister justin trudeau sat down with several california lawmakers today -- wrapping up the second day of his visit to san francisco. during his meeting with governor jerry brown he pledged cooperation with california on issues like climate change, trade, and criminal justice reform. trudeau also met with lieutenant governor gavin newsom. the prime minister's visit is part of a four day tour of the u.s. he's working to promote trade and wants to strengthen relations between the u-s and canada. he left for los angeles this afternoon. ((steve)) bart launched a campaign aimed at reminding passengers of the do's and don'ts of using the transit system.and they've enlisted a group of graphic design students to help them out.take a look...riders will see about a dozen posters on trains and at stations taking on topics such as backpack etiquette, elevator cleanliness, littering, fare evasion and behavior on trains.students from the college of arts designed the posters.earlier today, bevan duffy a member of the bart board of directors joined us in studio to discuss why bart feels these posters are necessary.i think we're trying to communicate that if your mom was watch