that in a letter and i have 13 -- 12 copies of that and then i have 12 copies of a letter from catherine petrin, one more, excuse me, miss clerk. she is the architectural historian i retained and she has responded to the reports attached to the applicant's brief, which we received this morning at about 8:15 in a very quick and summary fashion. but at bottom this eir fails to deal with the historical president impacts of the eir in a fundamental way, which the planning department and the applicant have now conceded the basis of. when this appeal started i pointed out that the historic preservation staff/planning department staff had made a legal error by assuming that the tower portion of this project is not within the historical preservation commission's permitting jurisdiction. both the planning department and the applicant have now agreed that that was a mistake. and have morphed to correct it. well, that has ramifications. one of ramifications is that it's now clear why the eir does notice actually assess the impact of this very large and hightower on the conservation district. because it wa