the curb cut was never discussed with either supervisor farrell or with catherine stephanie. it was never discussed. it was in this plan after we agreed and signed it and they were supposed to prepare revised plans. his idea of r -- revised plans did not ever include this in the agreement. for the last year she was asked to submit postage due to 311 hearing to the city planning and she's refused to do it. she wanted to build the building and get the permit after the fact. >> thank you. >> we can hear rebuttal from the permit holder, ms. white head. >> go ahead. these are the approved plans the board looked a there is a curb cut and there always has been a curb cat. -- cut. this is an example of being accused of being deceptive when the deposition is coming from the appellant. it's been the hardest thing for me to defend this project because of his on going twisting of facts. i also want to address mr. sanchez's understanding of what the board of appeals approved. there was a revision suggested to combine the units into a dwelling unit merger. the planning department communica