cathy cravens, the director of cornell university school of industrial and labor relations, and she says, american laws are antiquated. the momentum for the workers is accelerating, and i think it's going to be quite difficult for starbucks to work on. so many france at the same time. what starbucks has in its favor is that american labor law is extremely weak for employees in the private sector. so what there is one law, the national labor relations act that covers all private sector labor law throughout the entire united states. and that law is antiquated. it was passed in 1935, and there hasn't been any meaningful labor law reform in favor of workers since that time. so it allows, for example, for long delays. before employees get an election, it allows the employer to engage in a lot of tactics into union tactics against employees. and then even if the employees, when the remedies under the statute are very weak. so for example, the 6 employees, if they're terminated and that fills out the labor movement at that particular store, that the employer faces very, very low low remedies wh