it was picked up by charles koch to become the new president of the cato institute formerly known as the charles koch foundation and he keeps spreading the word of iran much like the b.b. and t. charitable fund koch allied groups like the cato institute have spent millions of dollars putting college professors in economics departments all across the country so that they can spread the good word of i and rand and help create a libertarian paradise here in america just like in somalia as think progress pointed out back in two thousand and eleven florida state university's economics department accepted a one point five million dollars grant from the charles g. koch charitable foundation of a cato institute which would provide funding for new professors but would likely teach about iran to libertarian economics similarly koch brag groups have given money to a number of other universities including west virginia university george mason university clemson university even the ivy league brown university basically the code to push to spend the millions and millions of dollars placing college

the privacy advocates at the cato institute said cell phones are different. >> it is like the equivalent of having your diary, your photo album, all of your bank records, your health records. your entire life is on you at all times. >> reporter: in a decision the justices agreed emphasizing a cell phone, unlike a wallet, contains vast amounts of sensitive personal information which together can form a revealing montage of the user's life. the same cannot be said of a photograph or two tucked in to a wallet. the international association of chiefs of police called the decision disappointing saying in a statement, it will undoubtedly impact law enforcement's ability to investigate and combat crime. the justices acknowledged that the warrant requirement will have an impact, but that privacy comes at a cost. now police officers can still search someone's cell phone after they get a warrant or if there has been some kind of emergency if, for example, they suspect a bomb or there's been a child abduction. but what they cannot do after this ruling is routinely go through someone's cell phone as

bank the current head of the koch funded or founded and funded cato institute gave brad's college of five hundred thousand dollars fellowship back in two thousand and ten so the dave brat could teach i and rand and libertarianism at randolph macon university like hundreds of other college professors across the country these days dave brat is really just a bought and paid for shill of charles and david koch and their buddies but the connections between brat in the dark money machine don't stop there he was also the hand-picked candidate the koch back world of right wing media specifically right wing radio over the past few months right wing talkers like laura ingram and mark levin have been pushing brat and it's hacking cantor nonstop on the radio shows anger me even went so far as to say at a recent rally for brat that she wished that president obama had given eric cantor not five guantanamo detainees to the taliban in exchange for bowe bergdahl i. wish to give this thing. you did talk this through. the. tribute to the sons. of can't see if this is. the end of the piece over the year

professor of applied economics at the johns hopkins university in baltimore and senior fellow at the cato institute he spoke to aaron earlier about venezuela and hyper inflation currency wars and federal reserve policy hey he believes that janet yellen the monetary policy schizo friending and first thank you to explain why here's what he had to say. this comes from. the separation between bank money and state money of course has been no one but it for a long time and and particularly in one nine hundred thirty eight john maynard keynes wrote the treatise his treatise on learning it which milton friedman thought was the best book and i agree and and he had this separation between state money state money is produced by a central bank and we call it high powered money or monetary base service you're looking at ams it's m. sub zero that state money and that accounts for about twenty percent of the money supply total money supply broadly measured in the united states the other trunk the they all of the room is bank money that's eighty percent in the united states and that's produced by banks commercial

professor of applied economics at the johns hopkins university in baltimore and senior fellow at the cato institute he spoke to aaron earlier about venezuela and hyper inflation currency wars and federal reserve policy hey he believes that janet yellen the monetary policy schizo phrenic and first i thank you to explain why here's what he had to say. this comes from. this separation between bank money and state money of course has been no one but it for a long time and and particularly in one nine hundred thirty eight john maynard keynes wrote the treatise his treatise on money and which milton friedman thought was best book and i agree and he had this separation between state money state money is produced by a central bank and we call it high powered money or monetary base surf you're looking at ams it's m. sub zero that state money and that accounts for about twenty percent of the money supply total money supply broadly measured in the united states the other trunk the they all of the room is bank money that's eighty percent in the united states and that's produced by banks commercial banks produc

bank the current head of the koch funded or founded and funded cato institute gave brad's college a five hundred thousand dollars fellowship back in two thousand and ten so the dave brat could teach i and rand and libertarianism at randolph macon university like hundreds of other college professors across the country these days dave brat is really just a bought and paid for shill of charles and david koch and their buddies but the connections between brat in the dark money machine don't stop there he was also the hand-picked candidate the koch back world of right wing media specifically right wing radio over the past few months right wing talkers like laura ingram and mark levin have been pushing brat in attacking cantor nonstop on the radio shows anger me even went so far as to say at a recent rally for brad that she wished that president obama had given eric cantor not five guantanamo detainees to the taliban in exchange for bowe bergdahl. but i wish to keep this thing. to talk this through and the. tribute to the sons. of can't. be and. over the years because it is treated we want to

professor of applied economics at the johns hopkins university in baltimore and senior fellow at the cato institute he spoke to aaron earlier about venezuela and hyper inflation currency wars and federal reserve policy hey he believes that janet yellen the monetary policy schizo phrenic and first thank you to explain why here's what he had to say. this comes from. the separation between bank money and state money and of course has been no one but it for a long time and and particularly in one nine hundred thirty eight john maynard keynes wrote the treatise his treatise on money which milton friedman thought was the best book and i agree and he had this separation between state money state money is produced by a central bank and we call it high powered money or monetary base surf you're looking at ams it's m. sub zero that state money and that accounts for about twenty percent of the money supply total money supply broadly measured in the united states the other trunk the they all of the room is bank money that's eighty percent in the united states and that's produced by banks commercial banks produ

the cato institute were worried that libertarian sounded crazy. the fact that ron paul ran for president and built a following against the iraq war and drafted countless young libertarians, that really surprised people. he is a very flawed politicians in the ways we were talking around before. given the ways ron paul built the ranks, as long as there is not an external threat like timing is that america's feeling, yes, libertarianism. >> i have a question about goldwater, the civil rights act, and the recent conflict in arizona. goldwater famously voted against the 1964 act because he did not like the federal government imposing requirements on private does this, but he had supported civil rights act deviously, including in 1963. is there a tension in that? in arizona there was a bill proposed that would allow discrimination based on religious views by private businesses, which resulted in a lot of conflict. is that a tension with goldwater, libertarianism? is there some way goldwater speaks to how the two w will get through those conflicts? >> i

the cato institute were worried that libertarian sounded crazy. the fact that ron paul ran for president and built a following against the iraq war and drafted countless young libertarians, that really surprised people. he is a very flawed politicians in the ways we were talking around before. ron paul built the ranks, as long as there is not an external threat like timing is that america's feeling, yes, libertarianism. >> i have a question about rights act,he civil and the recent conflict in arizona. goldwater famously voted against a 1964 act because he did not like the federal government imposing on the termination requirements on private does this, but he had supported civil rights act deviously, including in 1963. is there a tension in that? in arizona there was a bill proposed that would allow discrimination based on religious views by private atlases mrs., which resulted in a lot of conflict. is that a tension with goldwater, libertarianism? is there some way goldwater speaks to how the two w will get through those conflicts? think it repre

he founded the cato institute. it is this way they sought to influence the political system, not just through the funding of campaigns. they were said to have spent $400 million on the last election. a very small percentage of that was probably their money, but what they were able to do was bring together these resources from a variety of contributors and harness a lot of that money. that is why they have been so powerful politically. >> your book has a lot of personal information in it about the four men. let's start with fred. has he been married and does he have any children? >> no let's start with fred. has he been married and does he have any children? >> no. fred never married and he has no children. >> what about charles? >> charles is married -- he's been married for decades to a woman named liz and they have two kids. >> are they involved in the company? >> charles's son chase is involved in the company. and he is actually -- he was actually promoted not too long ago to president of i believe it was the co

the cato institute were worried that libertarian sounded crazy. the fact that ron paul ran for president and built a following

the cato institute called the overhaul one of the most impressive tax overhauls of any state in yearsd conservatives are creating buzz around the idea of a sam brownback presidential run in 2016. >> the red state motto is about lower taxes, less government, family values. it's about us being america again. >> of course, kansas wouldn't be a moderate red state motto without a restrictive voter i.d. law, drafted by chris coback, former bush administration lawyer who also helped draft arizona's papers please law before brownback became secretary of state in kansas. >> you have to remember every time a noncitizen casts a vote, that's effectively cancelling out the vote of a u.s. citizen. >> that's just the beginning. name an ultra conservative fight and you're likely to find conservatives. refusing to expand medicaid for some 80,000 uninsured kansasens and avoiding local gun laws. the 2014 brings a reckoning. as election day draws near, there are signs of rebellion. teachers who want their union rights restored. >> angry zit rary citizens, an teachers. >> to moderate republicans who want

there were a number of libertarians i had several of them on my radio program guys from the kit cato institute and from the iran institute saying just watch you will see now over the next six months to a year a free market will emerge free of government intervention there's no regulations in the marketplace at all there is a currency the u.s. dollar is now being used and there's a semi-functional court system the police are still intact and so we're going to have a libertarian paradise did work out what happened well i think you're talking about a starting point there and there's no real idea that that was a free market actually given where that country started coming right out of everything you just talked about or mention you know there's really no way that it can operate that way there was no infrastructure at all and i don't think it comes from government but i don't think most libertarians believe no most cons libertarians and i know and i'm talking about believe that there is a there's a constitutional mandate for the government to do certain things and they need to do them well and with

of that bank is now the head of the former charles koch foundation the cato institute and that you had several talk radio hosts laura ingram and mark levin principly who according to politico received hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars from the koch brothers so there was you know some real pull those low there and then you know leaf on points out that he went back and listened to four hours of dave brat speeches yesterday and he said they're all popular. he said the guy is sounds like a little bit worried constantly trashing the bankers and big business and well i'm curious your take on well it is an interesting mixture you know the truth is you had on one and you had cancer saying that he was a people's candidate and i think i was glad to see that least the voters saw through that cantor was so tied into wall street that he was just one of them it was just such a lie the it and you had this candidate that was smart enough to focus on a couple of things a focus on immigration because he knows that the that would give rise to the tea party turnout but more importantly he s

next we have the vice president for defense and policy studies at the cato institute. he has written widely including he had a by line in the new york times just yesterday. author of three books including the power problem 2009, exiting

chris preble from the cato institute. >> thank you, jacob. thank you, michael. michael, as you know, i hope you're right that we are at an inflection point, but i agree with barred burke that i'm -- ambassador burke that i'm afraid you're not. and maybe that's because i'm listening to people like robert cay began and charles krauthammer who say, no, we're not. the question is, what piece of evidence would convince them that the time has come to change course? you cite resistance from others, other great powers, the unwillingness to resources here at home and the resistance from the public at large. there are still some of them who say we could clearly resource this without with any difficulty at all. simply raise taxes or cut either spending. we -- other spending. and where's the actual evidence of balancing by other great powers? can you point to something there? because it seems to me we still don't have sufficient evidence to convince the other side that it's time to change course. >> well, that's a good point, particularly about the other great powers. now,

a person at the cato institute were worried that "libertarian" sounded crazy. the fact that ron paul ran for president and built a following against the iraq war and drafted countless young libertarians, that really surprised people. he is a very flawed politician in the ways we were talking around before. given the ways ron paul built the ranks, as long as there is an external threat like america feels, yes, libertarianism. >> i have a question about goldwater, the civil rights act, and the recent conflict we had in arizona. goldwater famously voted against a 1964 act because he did not like the federal government imposing nondiscrimination requirements on private does this, but he had supported civil rights act deviously, including in 1963. is there a tension in that? in arizona there was a bill proposed that would allow discrimination based on religious views by private businesses which resulted in a lot of conflict. is that a tension with goldwater, with libertarianism? is there some way goldwater speaks to how the two will get through those conflicts? >> i

in this case as well, both my organization the constitutional accountability session and the cato institute were on the same side of this case. similar to the merit quality case, we were on the same side. i think one of the ways you can see progressive outcomes in this court is in these sort of libertarian types of cases where you're talking about individual liberty. so that's interesting. and then sort of the last point i would make on the case is that i personally was really interested to see chief justice roberts and his opinion sort of analogize the privacy interests that we have and the desire to keep private the information on our smartphones to the founders' opposition to the british use of general warrants, which this way they could break into your house and go on a searching expedition for incriminating information. they sort of get that these private issues such as on phones we carry orndaround in our pockets every day shows they were with it both technologically and spiritually with the american people. >> i was just going to say one of the themes of the term that these cases fit

next we have the vice president for defense and policy studies at the cato institute. he has written widely including he had a by line in the new york times just yesterday. author of three books including the power problem 2009, exiting iraq, 2004 and my favorite i think is very interesting study, john f. kennedy and the missile gap also in 2004. and finally we have michael cohen who is a fellow at the century foundation. he has been a columnist at the guardian. a blogger for the new york daily news. he's the author of life on the campaign trail which is about notable 20th century campaign speeches of consequence and he is also published widely in wall street journal, new york times, l.a. times, politico, et cetera. so john, over to you, sir. >> good. i'm supposed to speak here. you can all hear me. i thought the subject of this panel and of this conference had something to do with realism so i'm going to playoff that theme and i'll get around to pl ticks at the very end. >> there's a narrow version of realism. i'm not talking about the academic theory of realism or th

in this case as well, both my organization, the constitutional accountability session and the cato institute were on the same side of this case. similar to the merit quality case, we were on the same side. i think one of the ways you can see progressive outcomes in this court is in these sort of libertarian types of cases where you're talking about individual liberty. so that's interesting. and then sort of the last point i would make on the case is that i personally was really interested to see chief justice roberts and his opinion sort of analogize the privacy interests that we have and the desire to keep private the information on our smartphones to the founders' opposition to the british use of general warrants, which this way they could break into your house and go on a searching expedition for incriminating information. they sort of get that these private issues such as on phones we carry oraround in our pocket every day shows they were with it both technologically and spiritually with the american people. >> i was just going to say one of the themes of the term that these cases fit in

in this case as well, both my organization, the constitutional accountability session and the cato institute were on the same side of this case. similar to the merit quality case, we were on the same side. i think one of the ways you can see progressive outcomes in this court is in these sort of libertarian types of cases where you're talking about individual liberty. so that's interesting. and then sort of the last point i would make on the case is that i personally was really interested to see chief justice roberts and his opinion sort of analogize the privacy interests that we have and the desire to keep private the information on our smartphones to the founders' opposition to the british use of general warrants, which this way they could break into your house and go on a searching expedition for incriminating information. they sort of get that these private issues such as on phones we carry oraround in our pocket every day shows they were with it both technologically and spiritually with the american people. >> i was just going to say one of the themes of the term that these cases fit in