he's doing phenomenal and so is justice cavanaugh. if you look at the end of the first term they came through -- the present campaigned on appointing justices who interpret and follow the law as written, and not how they wish it were written. they are judges, not senators. if you look at how justice gorsuch and justice cavanaugh did this last term, the president delivered on his campaign promise. they disagreed on several cases, but the disagreement was about a matter of law. it was not a policy outcome or political outcome. that's not how judges are supposed to operate and what we saw with justice gorsuch and justice cavanaugh. host: one of the highlights from this past term, highlighted by bloomberg is when it comes to siding withuch on liberals on four occasions, is that concern you? guest: no one would accuse justice gorsuch of being a liberal, he looks at the law. that's what judges and justices are supposed to do. you have colors talking about how they -- callers talking about how they wish justices were not political. they foll

cavanaugh, it is early days. i would say the following, anaugh has talked about being an originalist and textual list -- textualist. i don't think they could have -- set anthony kennedy was either of those. billy wanted me to difference, the one you can only point to was the partisan gerrymandering case. it's a case a number of years ago in which the majority rejected a partisan gerrymandering case. it was justice kennedy that was prepared to revisit that if the challengers came up with a formula he thought made sense. that was rejected. i think you could say justice kavanaugh made a difference in that case and with respect to the rest, it is early. host: did the newest justice surprise you with any of his decisions or comments and questions from the bench? guest: i don't think this was a surprising year from him. the replacement of justice kennedy with he marked a significant change in the court. justice kennedy was the deciding bunch of whole issues. it is early still. we didn't have most of those issues two fo

one of the reasons that i voted against brett cavanaugh's nomination to the supreme court is very likely holds a radical view of the second amendment. we can get into a long discussion about what the second amendment is really about, but there's no doubt in my mind that even if it does allow for the private right of gun ownership, it allows for congress to regulate that right. but kavanaugh and gorsuch and perhaps others may interpret the second amendment moving forward as to allow zero regulation or restriction from congress or state legislatures, allowing private citizens, even criminals, to obtain any kind of weapon that they want and that, i think, would be an abandonment of the founding fathers' understanding of government intervention on the question of second amendment rights, but it would make our country an even more dangerous place than it is today. i am very worried about the future of second amendment jurisprudence. >> you look at the weapon used in gilroy. it was a semiautomatic. thanks very much. >> skepticism is running deep in flint michigan was several candidates make pr

he's doing phenomenal and so is justice cavanaugh.u look at the end of the first term they came through -- the present campaigned on appointing justices who interpret and follow the law as written, and not how they wish it were written. they are judges, not senators. if you look at how justice gorsuch and justice cavanaugh did this last term, the president delivered on his campaign promise. they disagreed on several cases, but the disagreement was about a matter of law. it was not a policy outcome or political outcome. that's not how judges are supposed to operate and what we saw with justice gorsuch and justice cavanaugh. host: one of the highlights from this past term, highlighted by bloomberg is when it comes to siding withuch on liberals on four occasions, is that concern you? guest: no one would accuse justice gorsuch of being a liberal, he looks at the law. that's what judges and justices are supposed to do. you have colors talking about how they -- callers talking about how they wish justices were not political. they follow the

cavanaugh had a huge paper trail. the republicans figured out a way to hold back, and they held back a lot of the documents. host: the authority of the supreme court comes from the willingness of the republic and branches of the government to accept its decisions. the court has no army to enforce its rulings and is reliant on congress and the executive branch to hold up their into the constitutional bargain. guest: it is like a magic trick. the court issues an opinion and we follow it. consider it to be the proper thing to do in the will of our government. sometimes police powers have to be used, such as in the desegregation of schools, to enforce it. the danger in the court is if it loses public confidence and political confidence on capitol hill, then maybe their rulings will have less weight and become less relevant. our institutions are being tested right now. from new jersey, republican line. caller: good morning. i have a few comments to make. first, you have a bunch of clowns running on the democratic party. th

she used gossip to destroy cavanaugh but there were actually stories about al franken. he had due process under which he stuck around. i wish he had actually been questioned. but like a lot of people, he had the progressive pig pass. they survive and thrive as long as they support democrats and they look the other way. >> juan: but you think you should have had due process before leaving? >> jesse: he was guilty and he should have stuck around but, i think he knew it was going to be ugly. >> up next, a new video shows a new york city officer getting drenched with water and hit with buckets. disturbing, up next. car. i would feel like a cool dad. it's just really chic. i love this thing. it's gorgeous. i would pull up in this in a heartbeat. i want one of these. that is sharp. the all-new chevy blazer. speaks for itself. i don't know who they got to design this but give them a cookie and a star. (past them because she didn't sknow they were talking to her.g and she would just walk right (deborah) i just could not hear. i was hesitant to get the hearing aids because of my

after judge cavanaugh was confirmed by the senate but before he was sworn in as justice, chief justice roberts referred 15 complaints against judge cavanaugh to 10th circuit court of appeals, chief justice roberts instructed 10th circuit to review the complaints as the 10th circuit judicial council commenced its review, the 15 complaints grew to 82. then on december 18th, the 10th circuit judicial council determined it didn't have jurisdiction to review complaints due to judge cavanaugh being sworn in as justice on the supreme court. so i'm the chairman of the house ethics committee. we lose jurisdiction over members of this body, to enforce the rules of the house, the ethics rules when a member leaves the house of representatives. judges it seems now in the judicial branch of government, ethics laws are no longer binding on judges, once a judge is confirmed to a lifetime appointment of the united states supreme court. it doesn't seem quite right. i think it is understandable that people would be puzzled by the situation that we find ourselves in, specifically this process for reviewin

he also then initially said then judge brett cavanaugh was not qualified for the supreme court.ally he said he was doing a good job as justice. he brought kindness, hue multi, wisdom and independence. his unrelented commitment to justice has left us a better nation. he was 99 years old. >> o'donnell: tonight, something extraordinary. the moon has orbited the earth 669 times since the apollo 11 mission in july of 1969. an astounding 94% of americans with their tvs on watched the coverage. most of the sets were black and white. only a third of u.s. households had color, and most were turned to cbs and walter cronkite. >> this is cbs news color coverage of man on the moon. we are counting down toward the launch of the apollo 11. >> o'donnell: to cover the mission to the moon, cbs circled the earth. >> this is peter in paris. >> from seattle. >> square in amsterdam. >> more than 3,000 reporters assigned here-- >> o'donnell: cbs news space correspondent david schoumacher was there. >> you know, i was just another tourist down there. >> we have a liftoff. >> when the launch went, ever

cavanaugh, it is early days. i would say the following, anaugh has talked about being an originalist and textual list -- textualist. i don't think they could have -- set anthony kennedy was either of those. billy wanted me to difference, the one you can only point to was the partisan gerrymandering case. it's a case a number of years ago in which the majority rejected a partisan gerrymandering case. it was justice kennedy that was prepared to revisit that if the challengers came up with a formula he thought made sense. that was rejected. i think you could say justice kavanaugh made a difference in that case and with respect to the rest, it is early. host: did the newest justice surprise you with any of his decisions or comments and questions from the bench? guest: i don't think this was a surprising year from him. the replacement of justice kennedy with he marked a significant change in the court. justice kennedy was the deciding bunch of whole issues. it is early still. we didn't have most of those issues two fo

no big surprise with the addition of gorsuch and cavanaugh to the court. interesting that it is still falling short. the victory that they expect to get this term did not come through. the main protagonist has emerged as justice kagan for settled rules of administrative law neil gorsuch chance the protagonist that was going to bring the administrative state down. but the person who really holds the power is the chief. very carefully signing onto particular parts of opinions into one of the cases for them he say a little bit about the gundy case. first, this was a challenge to a provision the defender which let the attorney general how it would play out to individuals who had been convicted of sex offenses prior to the adoption. and, the delegation was attacked as an unconstitutional delegation, too broad of a delegation. the nondelegation doctrine has been around for a long time. the last time it was succeeded was in 1935. two or three depending on how you count them were held them. -- held then. before then others fail. interesting here, first of all that

. >> tucker: i don't know the cavanaugh kavanaugh, but what at person. >> who would want to sign themselvesr this? what happens when you replace any other liberal member of the supreme court customer >> tucker: based on what you know about what just happened, is there any right of center nominee that when it be destroyed by the left at this stage customers to go i think we have seen the game plan. this was done before. this was not the first nomination where you have this. it happened in brutal fashion with kavanaugh. >> tucker: have republicans ever destroyed the life of the supreme court? >> it happened when garland was nominated. they said, we are not even going to consider the nomination. >> tucker: i hope our viewers by the book. it's worth it. thank you. >> tucker: america's top colleges are supposed to be. they are not. that's a lie. they are a hotbed of racial discrimination. they still have power to control the way our society is structured. is that a good idea? knows the subject well. after the break. also following freaking news, former associate justin justics passed away at 99

, not just donald trump but a decade-long strategy on the part of the gop to appoint people like cavanaugh -- kavanaugh. likepromise, no one that will get on the court under me. a pleasure to meet you. >> [inaudible] . >> can we get a picture? thank you very much. >> [inaudible] i took care of- my son for years. the nurses. >> i know, i know. >> when i lost my wife and daughter -- [inaudible] >> thank you. >> i am not joking. thank you, from the bottom of my heart. >> i appreciate that. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] it is about purpose. the most consequential thing. nurses, today. you can work at the v.a. >> we have a mentally ill dau ghter. >> i am sorry. that is really hard. that is why we cannot undo the affordable care act. >> i know. >> i promised to get it back. thank you. talked to anthony, and stan. we're prettyng, andt about the situation, see --'d like to [inaudible] -- problem, >> again, guess what? we had a bipartisan bill passed with $740 million to change the circumstances, to cut it out. it makes no sense not to. you can't turn on a light switch, when t

or i have to say when we voted on judge cavanaugh to become a lifetime justice on the supreme court, you had three members of the senate who voted against him knowing full well that their re-election would be hurt and in fact they lost their elections. i hardly think that kind of broad statement does much good in my opinion. now, senator, were you aware that since 2013 the average time of senators has been 10.2 years, and that the average term of house members is 9.1 years? d then among the 1216th -- 116th congress the average term of senators is 6-10 years? did you know that? r. demint: ms. hirono: the people are not staying as long as you postulate. i just put that in the record. mr. demint: may i comment? ms. hirono: are you disputing the members terms? in, mint: folks come him like the tea party, lots of new people came in, or the 1994 -- the republican revolution in the house. but what happens is all these new people with bold ideas come in and all the committees are controlled by senior members who have been here 15 and 20 years. that's what i found. all the changing social sec

many observers are concerned that with the current supreme court, with justice cavanaugh now on the courty may be looking to overturn row v wade. and for antiabortion advocates, is this the case you would like to see go up or would they rather have a traditional abortion case do that. >> in the short term does state law or federal law apply here? which makes precedence, i should say. >> the federal constitution applies to everything that we do, so both apply. they still have to comply with the federal constitution so that will be the argument they're making here. >> remarkable circumstances. something to watch. jennifer, thanks for helping us understand it. >>> civil rights groups suing the state. we'll follow the story. another story we're following, health experts have been given the all-clear to enter detention centers holding migrant children in texas. the border patrol is routinely missing signs that those children are sick when they come in. we're going to speak to that doctor next. [tv sfx]: where have you been all my life? but then anne laid on a serta perfect sleeper. and realize

. >> sean: we need to senator senator graham, that changed the course of the cavanaugh hearing to take control of this. your country needs this. this is important. this republic came dangerously close to allowing lies and conspiracy theories. your country needs you. that's just the fact. >> there time is coming. the president is potomac has gone through hell for two and half years >> they've tried to ruin his family's life. it's their time. the only way you will ever stop this. >> sean: i believe you. thank you for what you are doing to get to the truth. joining us now is on "the new york times" list. number one best seller. freedom of the press. i had to talk this man into doing radio. this is a fact. i made him do it. he was reluctant and resistant. what i love about you is your brain more than anything else. you are a great constitutional scholar. i worried about a republic after i saw today. i've been worried for a while. >> as far as robert mueller goe goes, he was in no condition to testify, but on the other hand, he was on no hands to be on the special counsel. the victim here i

there was a concurrence by justin cavanaugh pointing out that all the state has to do is give equal treatment the state can solve this problem by allowing no one in the execution room. it is what i think they are doing later on. several weeks later, that you should a dissent. they basically took the view for this serious question. the mostly was just a slight. the two should have been denied a stay. that prompted him weeks later to fire yet another concurrence taking issue with them. this is obviously been a warm and cuddly time. i am still trying to figure out what he needs a buddhist. our final case. it deals with the excessive clause of the eighth amendment. he was convicted of doing drugs. and still in. the state wanted to forfeit is $42,000 removal. he had purchased with the insurance money he got when his father died. the hallmark channel cannot make this up. this was more than four times the fund available for these crimes. the supreme court thought this was hunky-dory. the supreme court took the case. unanimously flipped the. it is indeed incorporated. there you have it. the justice c

and judicial crisis network carrie severino examine the confirmation of supreme court justice rick cavanaughfuture of the court. they are interviewed by los angeles time supreme court corresponded david savage. >> we were trying to figure out in talking to these people who was it we saw a very different judge kavanaugh when he interviewed much more bush approach. then on thursday when he really came out strong it was fascinating to learn that in fact that was the person he really had been early on as the court has become more political in its decision-making when it makes laws rather than interpreting the law when it's written that creates a very political situation is not altogether surprising that it becomes the process itself becomes more political. >> at 11:00 p.m. eastern cbs news legal analyst quinn whaley offers her guide to reading and understanding the u.s. constitution. in her new book "how to read the constitution and why". >> a question i get a lot on television and regular conversation is, can he do that. can the president do that. my answer is, thus the wrong question. the ques

and the white house was gripped by a testimony, when cavanaugh's accuser came forward and everyone sat there live streaming that all day long. it had real consequences. the president -- also worth noting, the white house is mixed. there is one view that the mueller report is out, every drip drip drip has landed with more of a dud than people expected and this is not going to move or change public opinion or sentiment. it is true this is not something you hear voters talking about, democrat or republican bringing up as their top one, two or three concerns. the flip side is if mueller gets up there and testifies and does go beyond the scope of his report and does maybe explain that comment he made in his very brief press conference where he said, look, if i could have cleared the president of a crime, i would have. here's all the databases i couldn't clear him. on live television, that could be a rare thing that democrats are hoping to move the needle and sentiment. >> it's such a good reminder the feed is a window, whether we want it or not, into his mind. for better or worse, that is w

did a good job during the cavanaugh hearings she has to do something that will make her stand out. >>t would you suggest? >> if i were any i would go on the offensive and talk about my health care plan and why it works better than forcing people out of private insurance. >> harris: should anybody talk about medicare since we know socialism is unpopular? >> [laughs] >> harris: 's medicare for all a good idea >> amy klobuchar has to bring that up. she's got to say, "we are not going to win this election, guys, if he forced 100 million americans plus out of their health care into a government program. we are not going to win the election based on that alone." >> harris: i think you are going to get some calls for advice, governor rendell. thank you very much, i appreciate you talking about it. against two democratic debates today and tomorrow. thank you. republican senator steve daines has introduced a resolution condemning the "field experiments" of socialism. we will keep up with this. he joins me and asked to explain why you fix it was necessary and with the growing divide over social

remember that the i believers in the cavanaugh hearings are nowhere to be found when a democrat is accused of wrongdoing. case in point, the governor of virginia who gayle king interviewed, two women, one accused of a rate and other violent sexual assault of both telling people at the time that he is still in office and i have not heard a word from one of the i-believe hers, bill clinton serving two terms as president, what about the issue of russia collusion? two and a half years of conspiracy lies and a hoax, hillary clinton's bought and paid for dossier put together by funneled money filled with russian lies as john solomon will join us in a minute points out even the fbi knew 90 plus percent of it was a lie. and now we also know that it was unverifiable, because christopher steele never stood behind his own dossier. i have no idea if it was true what he said under oath. in the media spent months hyping phantom claims of obstruction against trump. did any of them ever talk about hillary's simply subpoenaed emails that she did not -- and g up the devices with hammers, removing sim cards,

just like they did with cavanaugh -- kavanaugh. host: why do you think it's more likely in the house intelligence committee rather than the house judiciary? guest: because they seem to be -- caller: because they seem to be more vocal in trump eight and their supporters. -- didid any that your opinion change from before you read it to after you read it? caller: before i read it, i was on the democratic side. after i read it, i am now fully in support of president trump. host: that is sandy in pennsylvania. andrew desiderio, what do you want to take from it. guest: first off, i have not heard someone acknowledge like that that they have read the mueller report, at least a member of the general public. even members of congress have not -- they have admitted on the record that they have not fully read the report. what i will say is that it is 448 pages, difficult to get through, reporters like us have read through it and picked it apart because it is necessary for our jobs and the investigations going on on capitol hill, but i think on

jim cavanaugh msnbc analyst, when we are early in on something like this, we don't have any officialion. i have to ask somebody like yourself who has so much experience and contact here, any of your networks commenting on what's happening here in fill roy, california. >> you know, richard, it's an awful theme there to see everybody scattering when they hear all the gunshots. sometimes these things are an attack on a crowd and other times they are disputes between people who happen to be in the crowd. so, of course, the first thing law enforcement has to do is to locate the shooter with the description you supplied in camouflage. okay, if there is more than one shooter, that changes the dynamic. if there is just one shooter, the motives are all opened. it can be sometimes a personal dispute even when a lot of people get shot. you know, there was just one last night in brooklyn at a gathering. nypd was looking for a gunman. one dead, 11 shot. but you don't know if it's coming as an attack on a crowd, it can be a terrorist attacks or is it some personal dispute, someone is going to get

when i am very concerned, you role duringy major justice cavanaugh's hearing. i am very concerned about putting judges on their who are re who are so rigid in their beliefs that they won't change over time. but i love the work that justice kagan is doing. and justice sotomayor, only because i was involved in their confirmation hearings. justice breyer and his opinions on the death penalty are important to me. >> i thought you would start with stevens. sen. klobuchar: justice ginsburg. the notorious rbg. my daughter had a photo taken at an event where i got an award with justice ginsburg, me and my daughter. she was like 18 or so. that night she said to me, i want to put this photo on my facebook page. do you mind if i crop you out? [laughter] >> because justice ginsburg is so cool. >> she will regret that if you are elected president. the debate stage you will be on , the debate stage this fall, what is your plan to break through? sen. klobuchar: i will continue to do what i did in the first debate, whether i broke through or not. i believe those debates are a

haggar who is running against jovn cohn corny susan running against brett cavanaugh collins and if you-- not the -- i don't like trump and i don't need the furrowed brow. i need your actual votes. >> the purity test is not timed. this is the white eye walkers and the night king. we have to come together, the southerners and the wildings and you know how we will know when we've gotten back to normal when we hate each other. for now i accept the george conways and the tom nichols and the more the merrier. >> i got lost in that metaphor. >> joe biden and senator kamala harrisa ever the two of them went head to head in the nbc news debate on the issue of bussing. joe biden has defended his position and he called bussing an asinine concept. he told chris cuomo the attacks left him disappointed. >> i was prepared for them to come after me and i wasn't prepared for the person coming after me, she knew beau. >> kamala harris, on wednesday a reporter asked her to elaborate her position on bussing and it was to remove some of the daylight between these two candidates. sally kohn, let me turn to

and today, you may have seen me in the cavanaugh hearings when i fought for justice.we are seeing another hearing and we are reminded of something you always stood for, and donald trump b listening, that in america, the law is the king. the king is not the law. so it is time for donald trump. the racism, to leave the white house, and we must have change in america. i stand for economic opportunity, for voting rights, something i have fought for dearly, and i stand for a better america for all of us. thank you for having me to riyad. . >> time for questions, ms. klobuchar. what is your black agenda? sen. klobuchar: we will not have a black agenda if we don't allow black people to vote. in georgia, where the secretary of state withheld 50 motor at best 50,000 border registrations because they did not have hyphens, if you did not do that, stacy abrams would be governor of georgia right now. my black agenda is to reauthorize the voting rights act, to make sure we carry the bill that senator sanders just mentioned, to make sure that every single person in this country is r

cfo jim cavanaugh wouldn't say how he expects red hat to help with cloud computing. the third straight quarter. that is your bloomberg business flash. nejra: thank you. let's get back to netflix. we are joined by bloomberg intelligence technology and media analyst. matt, great to have you with us. netflix, the second quarter tends to not be as good as the others. is this just a blip or the start of a long-term trend? matt: certainly, most analysts are agreeing with the company that it is a blip. blip. is some to come in at 2.7 million against the forecast of 5 million squibbers was a big miss. they expect them to have a better handle on what was going on in the business. the u.s. is a concern because of the u.s. actually shrank marginally. and you are seeing a combination of factors. it was a good q1. so it shows you that when you are working on a business model where customers can churn off on a monthly basis, you need to be on your game all the time in terms of pricing and content, to keep people on the platform. nejra: so how much of a risk is the competition? mat

this wasn't the fiery performance that we saw from now justice cavanaugh during his confirmation hearings have heard is the president was relatively pleased with how yesterday went. white house aides signaled that they thought he did well. people are still rallying around him on the republican side. but what will come into play here is how this plays out with the media over the next couple of days. what he wants to see now is how it's covered on cable and how it continues over the next few days. if this becomes a sorry, the labor secretary may have a you very tough time doing his job. >>. >> speaking of labor secretary alex acosta defending his role in cut ago sweetheart deal for jeffrey epstein a decade ago, a 2008 nonprosecution agreement that let the wealthy financier avoid the possibility of a lengthy jail sentence and violated a law to notify victims, acovered to go a recent court ruling, critics say acosta's offer shielded others who may have been implicated in epstein's misconduction. so some would say this is a favor for a lot of different people. a person familiar with the matter

just like they did with cavanaugh -- kavanaugh.t: why do you think it's more likely in the house intelligence committee rather than the house judiciary? guest: because they seem to be -- caller: because they seem to be more vocal in trump eight and their supporters. -- didid any that your opinion change from before you read it to after you read it? caller: before i read it, i was on the democratic side. after i read it, i am now fully in support of president trump. host: that is sandy in pennsylvania. andrew desiderio, what do you want to take from it. guest: first off, i have not heard someone acknowledge like that that they have read the mueller report, at least a member of the general public. even members of congress have not -- they have admitted on the record that they have not fully read the report. what i will say is that it is 448 pages, difficult to get through, reporters like us have read through it and picked it apart because it is necessary for our jobs and the investigations going on on capitol hill, but i think one th

the people making the accusations had knowingly made materially false accusations against justice cavanaugh. on that basis, referred the matter to the fbi for investigation. what if anything can you tell me about what action the fbi has taken on that or whether it has followed up? >> i am aware, as a general matter of the letters of the referrals that you are describing and i know we have reviewed them but i am not, as i think you would expect, going to be commenting on or confirming the existence or nonexistence of an investigation. >> i understand. i appreciate the fact that you have received it and as you can imagine it is important to the process and to this committee, that those appearing and testifying in front of, not be allowed to knowingly make materially false statements and hope and expect that is going to be just fine. the reports recently indicating that the fbi has been using photos from various states' drivers license databases, including utah's, to conduct facial recognition searches. the fbi maintains a number of databases, including some databases with photos in them. unli