how in the world -- last year wanted $84 billion published by cbm. the debt when up six point trillion dollars -- you cannot -- that doesn't work. i find it liabilities through $6 trillion. we can ignore that, we can continue but what that means is the average millennial is going to live in a 30% decreased standard of living. that is moral imperative that we ask that. host: the president is expected to release his budget today according to information that is found in the newspapers. there is some new spending involved when it comes to public-probert -- private initiative. do you think that is the right approach? guest: look at what they found in pennsylvania and ohio, they found people who were illegally signed up for medicaid. they compared to what they told the state and in fact they were not eligible. for a republican to survive, you have to have a virtuous and informed public. i would tell you that if you have one million people in two states the side of illegally for a government program and that average cost is about $7,000 a money.hat is a lo

how in the world -- last year wanted $84 billion published by cbm. the debt when up six point trillion dollars -- you cannot -- that doesn't work. i find it liabilities through $6 trillion. we can ignore that, we can continue but what that means is the average millennial is going to live in a 30% decreased standard of living. that is moral imperative that we ask that. host: the president is expected to release his budget today according to information that is found in the newspapers. there is some new spending involved when it comes to public-probert -- private initiative. do you think that is the right approach? guest: look at what they found in pennsylvania and ohio, they found people who were illegally signed up for medicaid. they compared to what they told the state and in fact they were not eligible. for a republican to survive, you have to have a virtuous and informed public. i would tell you that if you have one million people in two states the side of illegally for a government program and that average cost is about $7,000 a money.hat is a lo

we are into evidence-based medicine and into cbm and all that stuff so, how do you figure out that click -- i'll give you a couple in example personally. when my son was going into surgery the surgeon said you have to have a little faith and we did. it was wonderful. i remember when we're going into anesthesia, were talking about personalized medicine that he was wrapped up in his little blankets, and we took the blanket off and the doctor said no, he's going into surgery. blakey is in our safe in our home or my child is at college so how do you figure out all my encounters -- we are so based in science and evidence yet there is this faith and ability to depersonalize and not just working with adults but you're working with moms and dads, how do you do that? >> well, i think -- i have learned a lot and i'm not the expert but i've learned a lot from being in the role particularly now as ceo of a hospital about a lot of it's about listening i have parents and they're all through the room that come with great ideas. sometimes they come not so much ideas but i don't want to call them -- obse

now you have a loom or take, kim jong un, he's seeking cbm capabilities. despite the billions obama gave them and the right to continue to spend their centrifuges -- we need to get the economy going. we need to get americans back to work. americans offer food stamps and out of poverty, buying homes, you know what? all of this is so important. all they want to talk about is in russia, russia, russia. you, the american people, the people that went to the polls in november, the forgotten men and women that have been left behind -- you are now caught in a crossfire. an ideological crossfire. the groups that we have been telling you about, the destroy-trump-media, the destructive democrats, the lazy republicans, they are all doing this because they don't like how you voted. that's why tonight, we have to call out the republican lawmakers. they've asked for this job and they are now failing. they need to cancel their august recess. at stake, work like the rest of america, and washington -- to fulfill the promises they made to all of us here. if you people can't

has, fired off , they fire off this icbm, it is a inter continental ballistics missle known as a i cbm. it is late necessary a series of test firings. the united states tracked it for 37 minutes before it landed in the sea of japan. the launch of an icbm could be a game changer. that is what folks say. powerful enough to reach anywhere in the united states of america, you know, we're worried about hawaii, alaska, washington, oregon and california but now the whole country is feeling this tension now. >> so president trump criticizing north korean kim jong un, tweeting does this guy have anything better to do with his life, hard to believe that south korea and japan will put up with this much longer. >> white house says president trump and vladamire putin are set to meet this week. >> president is on his way to the g20 summit. "fox news" correspondent doug luzader has more on this. >> reporter: president spending the fourth here in washington but his travel itinerary for rest of the week is pretty extensive and one meeting in particular, could be quite challenging. unrest in german a he

both sides have achieved cbm in crisis management regime. another example is both reports believe, in recent years, the military relationship is a highlight of the whole bilateral relationship and the best it's been in decades. this is not only reflected on what in the differences in crisis management but also in the keeping and upgrading talks, exchanges and more corporations on the nontraditional security and the global governments. both sides have a partisan proposal has a convergence. however, both sides report have a lot of differences. i would like to point out two more striking once. first, americans report believes that asia-pacific strategy and the operationalization of the balance by the dod is inevitable and very positive in the interests of the united states, its allies and defense partners. however, china's report believes that military element policy mainly aimed at china and china is one of the major security challenges and in result has the intensified military and security friction between china and the us and the increase t

the reliability of our, i cbm system has been reconfirmed while demonstrating our ability to attack from time the anyplace and proving that all parts of the u.s. territory are within firing range >> the icbm traveled around 620 miles before landing in the sea. this video was captured around the same time as the missile fell into the water and shows a bright light off the coast of japan, while analystses say the entire mainline is not at risk. it could theoretically his los angeles denver or chicago >> the big threat is not just the icbm, it's coupled with a nuclear capability and what i'm most concerned with today is where they stand with this miniature rised nuclear war head >> after the launch, the united states conducted a like fire exercise with south korea and president trump called the test launch a reckless and dangerous action. in statement which reads, the united states will take all necessary steps to insure the security of the american home land and protect our allies in the region. >> there does appear to be technical improvements in the latest missile test. north korea first

and they did a test a simulated test against a north korean i cbm in -- icbm in may and it was 100% accuratethank god for the wisdom of president ronald reagan. look what he -- we would not be having this discussion right now about interceptors and missile defense had we not had a president in the 1980s who had a vision to give this country missile defense system. and i -- eric: he was attacked for that. >> he sure was, thank god for what he did or we wouldn't be having this conversation. we would not even be having a capability like that or patriot or the missile defense system we have on ships. eric: you are saying without president reagan's sight, we would be up the creek without a paddle right now. >> this president would have fewer options. really he has no good options right now because eric the fact of the matter is prior administrations, both republican and democrat, kicked the can down the road on the north korean threat and i can tell you, that ballistic missile threat combined with the nuclear capability that we have got to watch out for. we know that the iranians and the north ko

are very interested in not having their state and their constituents held at risk of a nuclearized cbm so they're working -- hard to make sure that we have a robust and credible missile defense system in the last thing aisle point out before we get into questions -- very port last year, the congress again both senate and house bipartisan effort and then to the 1999 national defense system that strike limited from it. so now it is not the goal of the united states it was never the goal but it was stated -- that the way that the build, law was written it sort of left the impression to the pent begun and to the missile defense agency that united states was only to build a missile defense system to defend against missile attacks be actually the united states has always been ail to build a missile defense is as it sees fit. so limited was the sort of baseline but not el kroog and so congress now has i think prudently amended that law and has strucken word limited so that now united states is just agreed to build a missile defense system -- it based on the threat and can sort of go forward i

considering pretty severe things in response to north korea's latest the -- missile test, i haven't cbmst market starting to sell off around that moment 74 point loss on dow futures right now, again,, words backed up by actions because little more than aek would ago you had treasury secretary steve mnuchin starting imposing he secondary sanctions on a few chinese entities related to north korea doing business with north korea. so again, it is very clear, that people within the administration not just president trump, understand how they are going to combat this north korean threat. >> oh, sure, to be sure, dagen, it is a tough situation a terrifying situation what we have going on in north korea right now. but i do think that one of the things that i have found most appealing about president's trumps' approach very open about it very open about trying to get chinese to help us, he -- he was encouraging of that, he worked hard as i think you can work it, but in the recent days when it has become clear that chinese have not done what donald trump wanted, he called them out on it, i think