>> we refer you to the cbo estimate on the ways and means committee submission. it does, in fact include some information about the effects of the repeal of the individual mandate. it does not provide specific numbers as to the number of individuals who would be losing coverage. >> mammal you play your microphone closer please. >> again i would refer you to the cbo on the ways and means committee submission regarding repeal of the individual mandate. it does not provide any specific numbers, as as far as i can see at the moment. i would ask you to look further at that submission, of cbo. >> i will wrap this up unless my colleagues have questions. i must be looking at a different congressional budget office report because it does have numbers and it says it would reduce the number of nonelderly people in the united states with the united states between 14 and 15 million, about 20% of those 14-15 million are children. so those look like real numbers to me mr. chairman. unless my colleagues have more questions we can proceed to the next. >> thank you. >> thank you v

>> we refer you to the cbo estimate on the ways and means committee submission. it does, in fact include some information about the effects of the repeal of the individual mandate. it does not provide specific numbers as to the number of individuals who would be losing coverage. >> mammal you play your microphone closer please. >> again i would refer you to the cbo on the ways and means committee submission regarding repeal of the individual mandate. it does not provide any specific numbers, as as far as i can see at the moment. i would ask you to look further at that submission, of cbo. >> i will wrap this up unless my colleagues have questions. i must be looking at a different congressional budget office report because it does have numbers and it says it would reduce the number of nonelderly people in the united states with the united states between 14 and 15 million, about 20% of those 14-15 million are children. so those look like real numbers to me mr. chairman. unless my colleagues have more questions we can proceed to the next. >> thank you. >> thank you v

that's not my office, that's the cbo. obamacare will cause 2.5 million employees to drop out of the labor market. it also created hundreds of rules forcing businesses to spend thousands of hours complying with new washington regulations. we should instead look at how we can free up businesses and promote growth and innovation. this bill will help reduce our deficit by over 79 billion over the next ten years and set us on a path towards a health care system that fairs cutting costs -- favors cutting costs and higher taxes. republicans are supporting greater economic freedom and opportunity and supporting families and job creators. i yield back. >> thank you. i now minute one minute to the gentleman from new jersey, mr. garrett. >> i thank the chairman. you know, there's bipartisan agreement that the medical device tax must go. the house of representatives voted to repeal it back in the 114th congress, the 113th congress and the 112th congress. traditionally, excise taxes are reserved for products such as alcohol and tobacc

. >> one second i think we shouldn't let that cbo by without recognizing two members of the pack are form members of the district pta thank you, very much. >> all right. item f is public comment on content items only i don't have any for consent items item g the consent calendar i need a may i have a motion and a second on the consent calendar >> move the consent calendar. >> second. >> thank you. any items withdrawn or corrected by the superintendent. >> yes. madam president. >> president murase we do tonight withdrawn is two c on panning 28 and corrections to one 51 k-11 on 27 and cost is one thousand plus not $7,500 and correction to say 51 k under codes the amount of money is missing for both the first one the amount is 3 thousand plus the e it is $15,000 and in the request of waiver for k-29 a correction november 2014 should be november 2015. >> thank you, mr. steel any items removed for first reading by the board? >> any items severed better late than never by the board for superintendent and vote i believe that commissioner walton has an announcement. >> yeah. i need to recuse

. >> the cbo which is nonpartisan says 60% of u.s. households on average get more in government benefits than they pay into the system in federal taxes. that's a big swing. the democrats act like there are government spending fairies that pick this money off trees. it is so cynical what they are offering here. we are in deep yogurt. there is way too much grey poupon spending in washington, d.c. and we can't afford it. >> i want to pick up on the cynicism. what happens when you spend this money particularly on poverty programs you create a sense of dependency on government by people that hasn't helped america. what's really helped america grow the fastest and get more people out of poverty is that sense of independence.

i also refer our colleagues to the cbo report, just draw your attention, right here to page eight. what it says, if you actually look at the long-term, beef up beyond our artificial tenure window, this legislation actually increases the deficit. all this talk about balance budgets is just nonsense. this actually increases our deficit over the period of time, outside the tenure window. and, interestingly, i think the chairman said inside the tenure window it had 79 billion in cuts but of course those go away, that is just an artificial marker. if i remember the republican budget had almost $4 trillion in cuts. this is your one shot and reconciliation. your one shot. you are just telling the world that you didn't mean it when you put for that whole budget. you are coming up with a piece of legislation that, in the long run it actually increases the deficit. it doesn't come close to balancing the budget. that was all smoke and mirrors. you are doing it though at the expense of 16 million americans who now have affordable healthcare, take that away and launch an attack on women's healt

we are at the cbo sites we're mapping out but also in terms of trainings they've had and some of the gaps in training they'll need in order to catch up again we'll be developing metrics specific sections focusing really on behavorial health and so with that, i'll take any questions the commissioners may have. >> thank you questions commissioners? >> i would just i think this is an excellent report it really covers all the phases with our organization chapter to what the focus is and the methodologies and development and training and hands on and measured outcomes also the development of may new tools that are being used in other areas but some should be changed because of the new requirements for the feds to respond to this too so as with both reports their excellence and you really it is well done well done thank you. >> it seems to be a lot of work in the training and preparedness of that and when did you start on this type of program for the ambulatory fair clinics i guess or did they have something before or how does it integrate into what we've heard earlier. >> so in terms of t

school day what are some of the same questions to be asking the students that are being asked by the cbos i really appreciate what your team and you have done in making the connections with beyond 12 those are two incredible resources the students will benefit from trembling especially the tracking of our country's as and a they graduate i want to czechoslovakia in with the state college fence appreciating that we didn't want them to go and not have some kind of a connection to us we know where you are and we're still here we want to what was that experience for the young people for city college and state. >> so particularly at city college there was so we had 20 students out of a projected 50 students and end up showing up to the initial orientation and 12 mentors and all the departments and city college there and the students were extremely engaged do have the opportunities to connect with the resources they'll need on campus so we maids positive connects with the students and i'd be able be able to follow up with the students some of the students they gets job opportunities and college

liz: we have to tell you fox news confirmed the cbo, congressional budget office, bipartisan on the best of days, says the report on the upcoming debt limit, the debt ceiling is pretty dramatically frightening and by early november this government will run out of money to fund its obligations. mr. colvin, does that play into trader sentiment at all? >> i think it does, living in the state of illinois mentioned it can't make pension payments and can't pay lottery winners that is a huge sign of what's out there. there's a huge problem and some call it a fiscal debt problem, others call it a spending problem, you have to get your ducks in a row, and pushing it down the road doesn't work, you're going to see buyers of debt here. liz: the budget is different from the debt ceiling. the budget is what congress approves, the debt ceiling, you want to argue about spending it's two different things. stephen, a lot of uncertainty as we look at the bottom ticker with the dow down 165 points. this market is selling off. is this a buying opportunity with the last 50 minutes left to trade here? >> you

. >> your concerns are well founded and how those bills will be paid, if you look at the cbo analysis of the navy shipbuilding plan, if it is executed as currently planned the navy will need a 30 percent bigger budget than it has historically gotten. that is the navy side. on the air force suddenly of the tanker and a ss. we were adhering a few months ago. one thing i want to bring up, which i didn't, we put program managers in terrible positions. when we create business estimates and technologies and mature, we put a program manager in that position, and they have to do two things, manage the program and then part discipline and at the same time defend the program. but we dobut we do with our program managers is not what industry does and it is a wonder they take the jobs. >> captain john mayer and his crew have moved upward. in the valley -- operating a lost 50%a lost 50 percent of the systems and the crew is extraordinarily happy. they outline the retirement. the war fighter does need the ship and we are pleased with the fact that the crew likes that capability and the statement re

we are at the cbo sites we're mapping out but also in terms of trainings they've had and some of the training they'll need in order to catch up again we'll be developing metrics specific sections focusing really on behavorial health and so with that, i'll take any questions the commissioners may have. >> thank you questions commissioners? >> i would just i think this is an excellent report it really covers all the phases with our organization chapter to what the focus is and the methodologies and development and training and hands on and measured outcomes also the development of may new tools that are being used in other areas but some should be changed because of the new requirements for the feds to respond to this too so as with both reports their excellence and you really it is well done well done thank you. >> it seems to be a lot of work in the training and preparedness of that and when did you start on this type of program for the ambulatory fair clinics i guess or did they have something before or how does it integrate into what we've heard earlier. >> so in terms of the actua

when i look at the backup for this, for the changes in direct spending and outweighs, cbo doesn't even say we are going to be getting money from it. i am against that provision. i will probably vote for the deal because i can't see jettisoning this important compromise is about. but you will have the power to issue regulations within nine months dictating the pregnancy and duration of such calls. i have a hard time imagining if someone has debt collectors coming after them, i have a hard time imagining that robo calls are very effective. i don't think robo calls are effective for anything, including politics. but i am pretty sure if you owe money to people, including the federal government, you are not paying much attention to robo calls. i would like to see aggressive regulations about this if it does become law about how frequent these calls can be in the duration of these calls. i think this is a stupid idea. robo calls, -- we should be getting rid of them, not empowering the federal government to make them. i would like feedback on the regulations you could put in place if we go do

for curriculum and professional development that's the first one the second one is to partner with cbo's to collaborate with health assessor those are one time costs and the items 3, 4 and 5 within the personnel section are annual costs so those are annual workshops for health educators and then the last section are non-neglect costs so the startup costs is $20,000 for a curriculum materials and in year 2 and i don't understand that we estimate that would require 5 thousand dollars every year to replenish those materials those are the specific items that has to do with with the health curriculum and summary table on the last part of the memo as a health curriculum totaled 682 it thousand dollars in the firefighter and 42 and one time is he 17 in reoccurring years. >> got it we're only do a one year so the expectation that every year this will grow are that this would capitalized to more teachers i'm assumeing it is actually, i shouldn't assume that but for training for the teachers they get once a year and set to do this piece every year or you know what is this looking like going forwar

as everyone here knows these are the nonpartisan experts, the new head of the cbo is there appointed by this chair, the chairman on the other side of the capital. and here is what the congressional budget office reports this bill will do. it would reduce the number of non elderly people in the united states with health insurance coverage by about 14 to 15 billion in most years, 20% of those estimated to be children. i would like to put up a chart. as you can see the affordable care act has had a dramatic impact in reducing the number of uninsured in this country. it is doing its intended job of providing affordable health care to another 16 million people. including children. and yet the priority of republican colleagues in this house at the time of dysfunction and pressing issues is to pass a piece of legislation that will take that health-insurance away from 16 million americans. it is astounding. at the same time we see an attack on women's health programs i would like to point up another chart here, this house has had three committees investigating planned parenthood. this was th

information released a study suggesting that allowing the export of crude will tend to lower prices. ,ou have cbo, gao, and cia government studies saying that exports in crude will lower the price. it will lower the price internationally. that means that refiners who are importing crude will pay less for it. prices will tend to fall. there are also a host of private , consultinges firms, think tanks that show that expanding the global pool of oil will tend to lower prices for consumers. host: running to the economic buyer -- arguments, national security argues, environmental are you. bring in our viewers, minnesota, line for democrats, good morning. caller: good morning. i would like to let these people know that i am not happy with the way the oil companies are doing us right now. crude oil is the lowest it can get and they keep letting it prices back up and costing people more and more money continuously. we will pay through the nose for it. let's keep it right here where we are getting it out of our own ground. keep the price down for the american people and forget the big business oil compani

about opening up more unlicensed spectrum for wi-fi, even highlighting your concerns with the way the cbo has scored the license spectrum over the unlicensed. so what are the potential implications of releasing more spectrum for that unlicensed use? >> thank you. unlicensed spectrum is incredibly important for our economy, think of it like wi-fi, dmoktizes internet access, it is the source of $140 billion of economic activity every year. and even our licensed carriers rely on it with when they offlo offload. >> it grinds it through an analysis that sometimes produces results that are odds with some of the committee and the congress. and one of the channels is that the congressional budget office prefers licensed spectrum to unlicensed spectrum, and that's because licensed spectrum raises revenue when we auction it off to commercial carriers. but what it misses is that unlicensed spectrum is a source of so much economic activity as i mentioned, $140 billion every year, so it's my hope that going forward, spectrum legislation and job creation. when it's set aside e and for unlicensed servic

which is already marked in your calendar as election day, two weeks from tonight is also the date the cbo says is now debt ceiling day. so think about the time frame here. paul ryan says he wants a decision on whether or not he's going to be the next speaker by friday. thereafter, this he have to schedule some sort of vote and he has to become the new speaker. it all better happen in a rush because the following tuesday is the absolute drop dead deadline by which this congress needs to vote to raise the debt ceiling or you can take the whole american economy out behind the woodshed in the backyard and kill it with a dull ax. so no pressure you guys. take your time. >>> there's news to get to on the 2016 front to get to today. there's exciting news on the democratic side which we're going to get to in just a moment. there's also interesting news on the republican side in terms of polling. but the juiciest piece of just plain gossip on the republican side today is what jeb bush's brother said about ted cruz. politico.com today naturally is the source for the high school locker room gossip s

it's a great perspective, representative hoekstra, former, good to see you, and donald marron, former cbo chief. appreciate it. >> thank you. liz: as we watch all of this, we need to remind you you're going to get it straight from the horse's mouth. i sit down on a fox business exclusive on a crucial day, he sent the letter to congress. secretary jack lew of the treasury. i ask him, do you have plans to devalue what is a very strong dollar, which we know from companies like walmart yesterday, it's affecting earnings negatively. walmart is not the only one. wait until you hear what he says about that, the debt ceiling, jack lew the only network he agreed to sit down with today. please sit down for the exclusive interview top of the hour on "after the bell." >>> president obama backing down on a drawdown. the long war in afghanistan no closer to conclusion. we have general bob scales assessing the president's latest military maneuver. live from washington, d.c. "countdown to the closing bell" is coming right back, and we've got a pretty decent rally. dow industrials up 176 points. s&p jumpi

you've always praised me for being the leader who said cbo estimates, seven years, you know all that?> absolutely. >> that's how we got to a balanced budget. you can't get to a balanced budget and begin to pay down debt and thus create jobs in this country if you don't have specific plans to make it work. >> but -- >> -- $11 trillion in debt, sean and say that's somehow going to lead to a balanced budget by cutting waste in the pews. that's not the way any business ruins. it's not real. >> i think there's definitely billions in waste fraud and abuse. there's billions that can be generated in the economy by eliminating the democracy. if you add to that the trillions of dollars overseas, thath: be rep-patrioted. and every candidate seems to have at least many of those components as part of their plans including you. >> my plan has all that sean. my plan has all of that as you know. it will help our economy. it's a significant tax cut for corporations including automatic expensing. it's bringing all those profits home from europe without any taxation. it's lowering our personal rate to 2

the original 2010 march estimate that the cbo did, they only had in 2016 a million people being moved of employer insurance and into the employer market. later they increased those estimates. >> are these healthy people, sick people who aren't signing up? >> so who is missing? some people that are missing have grandfathered plans we think. that wasn't initially supposed to happen and then there was a huge outcry people were losing plans they like. obama said if you like your plan, you can keep it. so they let the -- the administration let people keep old plans provided that they had them prior to a certain date. >> but what does this mean for the taxpayer in general? does it mean obamacare is more expensive, less? >> well, it means that it is less expensive from the subsidies because you're giving them to fewer people. they were expecting 19 million subsidized people and we're in the range now of 8 million to 10 million. on the other hand, the cost per person in subsidies we don't know what that looks like yet, but that could well be higher. who doesn't go on to the exchanges to buy i

about opening up more unlicensed spectrum for wi-fi, even highlighting your concerns with the way the cbo has scored the license spectrum over the unlicensed. so what are the potential implications of releasing more spectrum for that unlicensed use? >> thank you. unlicensed spectrum is incredibly important for our economy think of it like wi-fi. it demock ratizes internet access. it is the source of $140 billion of economic activity every year, and even our licensed carriers rely on it when they offload service onto it. it grinds it through an analysis that sometimes produces results that are at odds with some of the committee and the congress. and one of the channllenges is that the congressional budget office prefers licensed spectrum to unlicensed spectrum, and that's because licensed spectrum raises revenue when we auction it off to commercial carriers. but what it misses is that unlicensed spectrum is a source of so much economic activity as i mentioned, $140 billion every year, so it's my hope that going forward, spectrum legislation and job creation. in other words, every time that

another huge piece of the puzzle which is the focus of today's tax incentives for retirement which cbo estimates cost about $2 trillion over 10 years and then teresa's work suggests that maybe 20% more if you included the state level impact because states attended piggyback on the federal rules for defining incomes. i want to focus on three pitches today related to this. the first is the fairness of the current incentives in terms of people who are participating in employer plans at the second is how to increase access to employer plans. unless one is how to improve the effectiveness of the plans themselves better improving retirement security. so on the first subject, the evidence is about our current retirement savings incentives don't increase how much people save out of their own money for retirement. they did increase how much of savings they have for retirement which may sound a little paradoxical, and one way to think of it is supposed that i take on $50,000 of income and would say 5000 retirement without any savings incentives, and then you can when thousand dollars savings ins

which cbo and jct estimates costs about $2 trillion over ten years. and then teresa's work suggests that's maybe 20% more if you include the state-level impact, because states tend to piggyback on the federal rules for defining income. so i wanted to focus on three issues today related to this. the first is the fairness of the current incentives in terms of people who are participating in employer plans. the second is how to increase access to employer plans. and the last one is how to improve the effectiveness of the plans themselves at improving retirement security. so on the first subject, john will discuss this and is the author of much of the most important, empirical research on the subject. but the evidence is that our current retirement savings incentives don't increase how much people save out of their own money for retirement. they do increase how much savings they have for retirement which may sound a little paradox ical. and one way to think of it is suppose i take home $50,000 of income and would save $5,000 for retirement without any sav

i think if you look at the cbo's analysis of the navy shipbuilding plan, if it's executed as it is hardlylanned the navy will need 30% bigger budget than it has historically done, so that's on the navy site. on air force side we have the tanker, jsf at a long-range strike are coming. at the same time the army is shrinking. so those bills are going to have to be paid somewhere, and if they are higher than we think now, we would be in real trouble. the program managers, i remember we are adhering to a few months ago and you'd asked me a question about that. one thing i want to bring up which i didn't and was we really put program managers in terrible positions. when we create this is cases where a program is under estimate and is in a scheduled to get things done and technology is immature, we put a program manager in that position and they have to do two things. they have to manage the program and participant, at the same time have to defend the program. so what we do with our program managers is not what industry does come and we grind really good people. why do they take the jobs? >> exa

estimated cbo's study 390,000 women would lose care next year if planned parenthood -- if women can noonger go to planned parenthood. i think some of the questions raised, it is really important for folks to understand, just as you talked about how women get breast exams and breast care in this country come a in some areas, we are the only safety net family planning provider. and that is the care for most women, in particularly, young women, the care they need his family planning, access to cancer screenings. in many areas, there are long waits. 60% of our clinics will see folks the same day. in some areas, they won't take any more medicaid patients and medicare -- and planned parenthood's billing entity. >> it is true the medicare and the targeted audience or group that used planned parenthood, are often those who are most at risk -- african-american minority women diet higher level than any other population when it comes to breast cancer, when it comes to actually dying from having pelvic or cervical cancer . so we are actually giving opportunities. amy: in this is michigan commerce

. >> so we have a question from twitter about the cbos 2016 aca enrollment projections at 22 million. and the question is, how realistic is that, and what is the appropriate or as the questioner puts it, the better national goal? >> i'll just jump in with some data based on our surveys. these are just projections of people who remain uninsured. we, we, out of about 25 million uninsured adults. these are 19 to 64-year-olds, about 6.5 million or about 26%, so about a quarter are under 100% poverty and living in medicaid, non-expansion states, so that's a group that will likely remain uninsured this year. we're showing about 10.5, about 10 million people who are eligible for marketplace plans that have incomes in the range that make them eligible for the marketplaces. it's similar to the number that hhs is expecting who are eligible for marketplace, marketplace enrollment. and about 5.5 million are eligible for medicaid in expansion states. so that's sort of how the break down, break down goes. these do not adjust for immigration status. one, one major barrier that we're seeing in our su

cbo, what it says its offset. remember, this is the way walk speaks. offset but offset in years eight, nine, ten. spin the money now over the next two years, pay for it in years eight, nine, and ten. most families don't get to operate that way. certainly the federal government shouldn't operate that way, particularly when you have now what's approaching $20 trillion national debt. so that's why this bill is a bad package. and why a number of us are going to be voting against it tomorrow. >> all right. now, the commercial budget office ruled said that it does what it's supposed to do. i didn't understand what it meant. not that it was revenue neutral but offset. but the savings from what i understand are in future years. >> of course. >> which means there are future blimps of savings that they're envisioning that aren't there. >> yeah. exactly. and, oh, yeah, remember, we just did this two years ago where we increased the discretionary spending levels but we said we're going the offset it with certain cuts in the future. now we've already changed that a

you saw the cbo study for every person that makes a little more, 500,000 people -- but even you, are willing to say, okay, let's race it but to the perfect level as if there is a perfect level we can figure out, andy. why not just say let the market dictate? >> i would be perfectly happy with the market dictating what the minimum wage. >> but you are saying what all of the guys are going to do. no one is saying what needs to be said. >> well nobody is going to go out and say we should eliminate the minimum wage. and if they do say that, they will set themselves up to lose the general election. and i've become a one issue voter. we can't afford to lose it. and if we are going to lose it over minimum wage, we can't lose it because we are the anti-immigrant or anti-woman party. you talked with mitt romney about what not to do. don't talk about the 47% or the support -- >> but to some extent, to some extent, that was -- not saying it is the truth about the 47%, i'm just saying tu will find it easier to get elected in this country if you are not appealing -- it is tough to say we need to

which is already marked in your calendar as election day, two weeks from tonight is also the date the cboays is now debt ceiling day. so think about the time frame here. paul ryan says he wants a decision on whether or not he's going to be the next speaker by friday. thereafter, this he have to schedule some sort of vote and he has to become the new speaker. it all better happen in a rush because the following tuesday is the absolute drop dead deadline by which this congress needs to vote to raise the debt ceiling or you can take the whole american economy out behind the woodshed in the backyard and kill it with a dull ax. so no pressure you guys. take your time. there's a more enjoyable way to get your fiber. try phillips' fiber good gummies plus energy support. it's a new fiber supplement that helps support regularity and includes b vitamins to help convert food to energy. mmmmm, these are good! nice work, phillips! the tasty side of fiber, from phillips'. ♪ ♪ the beautiful sound of customers making the most of their united flight. power, wi-fi, and streaming entertainment. that's... se

i think if you look at the cbo's analysis of the navy shipbuilding plan, it's executed as its currently planned, the navy needs a bigger budget than its historically got. that's on the navy side. on the air force side, we have the tanker, the jsf and the long-range strike is coming. those bills will have to be paid somewhere. and if they are higher than we think now, we are going to be in real trouble. and on the program managers, i remember we were at a hearing a few months ago and you asked me a question on that. one thing i wanted to bring up which i didn't then was we really put program managers in terrible positions. so when we create business cases where a program's underestimated and there isn't enough schedule to get things done and technology is immature, we put a program manager in that position and they have to do two things. they have to do part discipline. at the same time, they have to defend the program. so what we do with our program managers is not what industry does. and we grind really good people up. so why do they pick the jobs? >> exactly. >> senator, may i make a

which is already marked in your calendar as election day, two weeks from tonight is also the date the cboays is now debt ceiling day. so think about the time frame here. paul ryan says he wants a decision on whether or not he's going to be the next speaker by friday. thereafter, this he have to schedule some sort of vote and he has to become the new speaker. it all better happen in a rush because the following tuesday is the absolute drop dead deadline by which this congress needs to vote to raise the debt ceiling or you can take the whole american economy out behind the woodshed in the backyard and kill it with a dull ax. so no pressure you guys. take your time. when you're not confident your company's data is secure, the possibility of a breach can quickly become the only thing you think about. that's where at&t can help. at at&t we monitor our network traffic so we can see things others can't. mitigating risks across your business. leaving you free to focus on what matters most. >>> there's news to get to on the 2016 front to get to today. there's exciting news on the democratic side w

for curriculum and professional development that's the first one the second one is to partner with cbo's to collaborate with health assessor those are one time costs and the items 3, 4 and 5 within the personnel section are annual costs so those are annual workshops for health educators and then the last section are non-neglect costs so the startup costs is $20,000 for a curriculum materials and in year 2 and i don't understand that we estimate that would require 5 thousand dollars every year to replenish those materials those are the specific items that has to do with with the health curriculum and summary table on the last part of the memo as a health curriculum totaled 682 it thousand dollars in the firefighter and 42 and one time is he 17 in reoccurring years. >> got it we're only do a one year so the expectation that every year this will grow are that this would capitalized to more teachers i'm assumeing it is actually, i shouldn't assume that but for training for the teachers they get once a year and set to do this piece every year or you know what is this looking like going forwar

baseline to be a little bit larger than the others not ideal but done all the time and some baseline cbo o come into path we'll absolutely maintain a 4 foot, however, 5 foot travel we'll mediate the requirements the trunk of the tree verizon will get close is to the awning where the tree leaning in the wind will be problematic and you'll concede it, it is reasonable to concede it 5 tree on 9th street. >> in building if something is not done per permit a notice of violation is issued is there something similar with the urban forestry and we'll typically send a letter we had an integral active dialogue we pointed out the short coming when construction related our ultimate hand to not sign off on the job card it creates problems we typically had to withhold signing the card at the conclusion of project. >> you mentioned one of the trees would interfere in an integral awning is that the awning from the building being put in. >> it is. >> thank you. >> so there's a unless i'm getting it wrong a conflict in the story the project sponsor had said at the wrote a letter to dpw saying this is not

the cbo has shown the effective sequester right now is about 500,000 jobs the year.he sequester, we would not be having this conversation about a disappointing jobs report is would have another 40,000 or so jobs. we know what to do here. this is not an act of god. this is an act of political failure and the republican congress and that is what we need to do, move forward. i meet people all over this country. they don't have the time to sit and listen to these ideological debates about riders. they want a good job and grow their wages for their family and either families. mike: thank you for joining us. someecretary of labor with strong words for john boehner, mitch mcconnell, and republicans on capitol hill. ask something that would create jobs. we will see of president follows that up today with any kind of political call to action. markets are calling for action, or at least for margins. margin payments. dow jones industrial down 220 points right now. s&p 500 off 25. this is "bloomberg surveillance." ♪ ♪ "bloomberg surveillance." a disappointing jobs friday. julie