the customer has a seamless experience when they transfer to a cca bill. the customer pays that to p jenny and they give our portion to us. >> customers in our service area actually have four choices for their power supply. they can choose pg and e which is currently 22% renewable or choose our light green product which is 55% renewable and that's the product that customers are automatically enrolled into if they don't choose another option. we offer degreen, that's 100% renewable and it's verified by green e energy. we have just announced a third option for mce which is shares which is a local solar projects built within our service area that customers are purchase as well. >> can i - sorry. you're going to talk about that local build component. >> yes, i am. this shows our power sources between 2010 and 2013. we have contracts with approximately 12 different power suppliers and we buy our power from all over california, from oregon and washington state. we currently have 54 megawatts of new renewable energy that's being built for our customers in califor

and it recalls that this bill will eliminate this opt out and put in place the opt in requirement instead. and there are ongoing amendments to allow pcas to expand existing ccas or new ccas to expand to three counties, and it includes those amendments include some grandfathering provisions for existing like ourselves those amendments were passed. and how the amendments will be finally incorporated, and the application of those grandfathering provisions, to the clean power sf, are still to be understood so it is kind of a stay tuned message on that and it is not over yet and that concludes my report, and i am happy to take any questions. >> thank you. and thank you for your presentation. and your report. >> and just a question, on the work that is being done around cca, here, and includes us locally and the discussions with the clean energy and sonoma and the representatives from lafco can take part in the puc discussions with these entities. >> and i imagine so, and i am remiss of not mentioning that the members of your own staff and lafco staff were present and participated, thank you. >> okay, great, that is going to be mr. kelley the general manager is obv

what they bills were going to look like and we did our best to make sure those questions were already answered. >> commissioner moran. >> on the pg and e program, when we were looking at the cca, that was kind of the -- it was almost the boogie man. this is something they were pursuing. has that ever happened. >> the pg and e proposal is still before the california puc. it hasn't been approved. there was activity that caused the puc to make some method my -- some modifications but it should be before the california puc for approval some time in the summer, early fall. >> okay. >> they were supposed to have their program finalized and approve by the beginning of this summer, but that didn't happen. >> and the shape of that program, i assume is getting clearer over time? >> yes, as clear as things can be in that regulatory process, yes. >> i noticed that both marin -- that changes the risk profile because we have deep pockets of the general fund, one of the things that was kind of convenient about the shell contract is that they required that we basically fund our liabilities and fund their risk so that we internalize the risk. we've been talking that that's changing. i don't w