the first for single-family is 4 ccf, the first for multifamily is 3 ccf. for our nonresidential customers variable charges, we don't have tiers. the usage characteristics are so different in that customer class, and we currently have a different volumetric rates for a very small customer type. on the waste water side, we currently have no fixed charge. all our revenues are recovered on a volumetric charge. we have no tiers, and the volumetric rate for residential charges is based on a standard strength -- standard domestic strength sewage estimate. for nonresidential customers, we have separate rates for total suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand and fats, oil and grease and those are the constituents that makeup the sewer service rate and they're actually separate for nonresidential customers and based on standard industrial classification codes. so those nonresidential customers that have very strong sewage would pay more than those that have tears. the volume metric rate is based on a stan domestic strength sewage. for now-residential customers fire

maybe we are at ccf money totally here which means then can't complain, and that's what i hope but this is something that in the procurement policy we just did, because of the fta rules indicates just how serious they are about stings, contract stings. >> within the report i do identify that this is going to be funded by program reserve which is -- >> in financing. and the other element that is important, there's a nine-year criteria as well where you do have to rebid. . we have done that with the tmtc. and we are within that crack that allows for three, one-year stings and we have allowed for two of those three years. >> our contracts allow for two. and it didn't impress the fta. anyway, just relating that problem. >> director nuru: dreadirector. >> you can just explain why -- is there a projection you will need to get to closeout? >> there will be minor savings left over from the 72.5 that will carry over as a contingency. better i arrived at the 2.4 million was a bottom-up. i figured -- what we need and a staffing plan and i do have some contingentt contin contingency for the 2.5. we

mulvaney you should not be too construed to suggest as an active dish active director of the ccf be -- cfpb i'm looking forward to the circuit court ruling will not stand by that you would harm consumers they do have particular questions you have made it quite note this morning that you don't have to answer questions. i know why you think that is so extraordinary to previous directory -- director came to 63 times so we expect you to be here. given that the president once to support his friends on wall street it is clear about his goals to install you at the consumer bureau as well do you support the mission do you answer that with yes or no and i am remembering when you said you remember having said that cfpb that the even exists i will be perfectly honest to mecca don't remember saying that representative but that doesn't like something i would have said. >> you also said in a sick and sad kind of way you remember saying that you cannot have a specific recollection but if you set i did then i did. >> yes or no with a bill that was introduced that was completely repealed and i cannot