is celeste drake, and i work on trade and globalization: the. i am very excited to be introducing today's panel and the really important topics we will be discussing. talking about washington, d.c. can be extremely frustrating. apply thers too often simplistic and frankly incorrect free-trade versus protectionist dichotomy and think they have brilliantly said everything there is to say on the topic. but they could not be more wrong. arellectual property rules a critical part of u.s. free-trade agreements and trade policy, but they represent a clear deviation from so-called free trade. afl-cio areke the often labeled as protectionist. even though we support duty-free fortment for most goods most developing nations. that is a distinct lee free-trade position. interesting thing about this administration and its actions on tariffs -- if this vision to protect national security by 232 tariffscalled on global imports of aluminum and steel, and it's decision to address china's intellectual property theft by opposing what is known as section 301, tariff

my name is celeste drake and i work on trade and globalization policy for the afl-cio, and her 12.5 million 5 million members. i'm very excited to be introducing today's panel and the really important topics we are going to be discussing. talking about trade policy in washington, d.c. can often be extreme a frustrating. abundance and commentators too often apply the simplistic and, frankly, incorrect free trade versus protectionist dichotomy and think they have brilliantly said everything that there's a say on the topic. but they couldn't be more wrong. for instance, intellectual property rules are critical part of u.s. free trade agreement and trade policy but to represent a clear deviation from so-called free trade. advocates like the afl-cio are often labeled as protectionists, even though we support duty-free treatment for most goods from most developing nations, and that's a distinctly free trade position. that's one interesting thing about this administration and its recent action on terrace. it's decision to protect national security by imposing so-called 232 232 tariffs on gl import

my name is celeste drake. i work on trade and globalization policy for our 12 in half members. i'm very excited to introduce the panel and the important topics we will discuss. trade policy in washington d.c. can be extremely frustrating. too often they apply the simplistic free trade at versus academy economy and think they have set all they could say on the topic but they couldn't be more wrong. intellectual property rules are critical part of u.s. free trade agreements and trade policy but they represent a clear deviation from free trade. advocates are often labeled as protectionist even though we support duty-free treatment for most goods from most developing nations and that's a distinctly free-trade position. that's one interesting thing about this administration and its recent action on tariff. the decision to protect national security by imposing so-called 232 tariffs on global imports of aluminum and steel and the decision to address china's intellectual property theft. they represent outside the box thinking. if such willingness to promote these tariffs isn't the star