yes, vyacheslav likhachev will be in touch with us now, an expert at the center for civil liberties of eastern studies. glory to ukraine. mr. vyacheslav, we congratulate you. glory to the heroes, good day. well, a number of countries, in particular norway, ireland and spain, have already officially announced the recognition of palestine. states, that's enough symbolic moment, we understand that history is not new, there, if we take only the 20th century, the confrontation between the state of israel and various arab structures, it, well, it was extremely bloody. what do you think, why exactly now these three countries dared to officially recognize palestine? well, yes, i agree with you that this story is not... and actually, if we recall ukraine's relationship to this issue, then ukraine recognized the state of palestine back in 1988, when it was part of the ussr and continues to recognize it, as well , which most of the world's states, i.e. three states, three more states that announced the recognition of the state of palestine, they do not create or change the weather here. the distr

the air and deprived of the right to broadcast, our human rights organizations, and the center for civil libertieskharkiv legal group and a number of others made a statement about , that this is a disproportionate interference in... the water of speech, so it is not surprising that this report contains criticism of the telethon, because the decision that was adopted in the 22nd year and could be relevant in that context, well, with a change context in the 24th year needs revision. well , here it is very important to understand, you know, where decisions are really made, which are justified by the needs of the war, which can also be right, which can be... be wrong. and where is the solution, where war is used to strengthen the monopoly of power. how to distinguish it? and this differs not from the fact that we climb into the heads of the executors or adopters of these decisions, that it is impossible to do, but we conduct a test. for example, when we talk about freedom of speech, there is a three-step test which used in practice, for example, by the european court of human rights. he talks about th

difficult issue further, we will be helped in this by vyacheslav likhachev, an expert of the center for civil liberties a researcher of right-wing movements and a historian. welcome to our broadcast, thank you for joining. good morning. for understanding, we told a little in the introduction to this, yes, but tell us about the history of the creation of the azov battalion, from the moment of its foundation in the 14th year, what we told biletsky about, azov underwent significant changes and transformation there in terms of views, did it really happen and what were these changes? in general, i would carefully analyze the unit of the armed forces of ukraine, well, before that, the national guard in terms of views or ideologies, we are talking about the existing unit in the ranks of the defense forces of ukraine. what other ideology, except for the protection of state sovereignty and territorial integrity and the existence of the ukrainian state in general , should not have and does not have in us, well, it is forbidden and political activity is not carried out in the harbors of the armed forces, it is no

interlocutor is oleksandra matviychuk, human rights defender, head of the organization center for civil liberties , which was awarded the nobel peace prize, and laureate of the vasyl stus prize. greetings, ladies, good evening. let us start with the report of the state department of the united states, which is dedicated precisely to human rights in ukraine, there are a lot of serious remarks on addressed to russia, which could have been foreseen, but there are also remarks addressed to ukraine, but it seems to me that these remarks need to be analyzed, which is the most important thing there, how should we do this, if you want to work on mistakes, because this is just a statement facts obviously, and we have to do this work on mistakes, understanding the context. we are trapped between two logics, the logic of war and the logic of democratization, and it is difficult to balance between these logics, so the facts presented in the report should not be viewed as just criticism as something that needs to be fixed. for example, considerable attention is devoted to the topic of freedom of speech, and i

comments, to you vyacheslav, thank you for joining, vyacheslav likhachev, an expert at the center for civil liberties, a researcher of right-wing movements and a historian was a guest of freedom mornings. and in the swedish city of malmö, the second semi-final of the international song contest eurovision 2024 took place the winners were austria and latvia. the netherlands, norway, israel, greece, estonia, switzerland, armenia and georgia. they, together with the winners of the first semi-final , will meet on the stage tomorrow, and now we will show you the school, for the restoration of which the representatives of ukraine at the eurovision song contest, alyona alyona and jerry hale, are raising money. this is a gymnasium in velika kostromka, dnipropetrovsk oblast. we were just in the ukrainian language class and there was an inscription. which the teacher did in front of us on february 23 , we had the ukrainian language, it was the last one, i was i stayed here, maybe i left there twice, and it was there for 3-4 days, but that’s how i stayed here, we lived with my mother in the cellar of my grandmot

civil liberties union, the aclu. my wife and i gave him $20 million to set up the david trone center for justice and equality. 45 more working in new york city and all around the country to fix our criminal justice system that is so broken and so racially biased. >> rebuttal for county executive angela alsobrooks. >> it is easier to discuss a problem than to repair it. on the only person in this race who has had the awesome response ability of keeping the community safe and i did so without apology to work to keep members of the community safe. i have talked to mother to last long - young children and i had to hold husbands who lost their wives and i can tell you that these are not easy cases. i do not support the death penalty. life without parole is that penalty but i make no apologies for keeping our communities safe. >> rebuttal for david trone. roger hartley are police have a tough job to do, real tough job and we have to invest in them to help them do their job more successfully. last congress we passed a bill, karen bass and myself putting $124 million to police to learn about mental illness, mental health cha

civil liberties union who works on the project. focuses on first amendment free speech protections and a legal advisor for africa at the international center for nonprofit law and serves as assistant general counsel to the new york city council. holds a political science degree, a master's from princeton studies and juris doctor. >> and our next-- we will break away from this moment momentarily to bring you a brief senate session and we'll have more from an anti-semitism hearing in just a moment. ... the presiding officer: the senate will come to order. the clerk will read a the clerk will read a >> assume come to the senate: under the provisions of rule 1, paragraph 3, of the standing rules of the senate, i hereby appoint the i hereby appoint the the clerk will be signed: patty murray, president pro tempore. president pro tempore. indication stands adjourned until 10:30 a.m., tuesday, >> lawmakers will be back next month to resume legislative work. we take it back now to the hearing on anti-semitism on campus. >> i want to recognize you of your responsibility to provide accurate information to the subcommittee. with that, let's get starte