people's commissars of ukraine grigory ivanovich petrovsky, chairman of the all-ukrainian central executive committee stolen the last workers from them and that they were left with only peasants. let's decide what ilyich noticed to offend them, and so lenin decided the fate of millions of russian people who wanted to be in russia but mostly rural ukraine needed a proletariat conscious working class and it was possible to take it only in the donbass and lenin, as it were, decided to commit to a peasant then ukraine there the peasantry is not a developed proletariat. no, but it is necessary to kill, the proletarian region, one of the most powerful proletarian regions. that is, it is a superbass with the working class, which was basically gra c engineers who took over the soviet power there and so on to make it an industrial republic in this way. socialism will develop there, it was decided to quote verbatim. so , instruct comrade stalin to destroy the kriv, donbass of the krivoy rog, donets basin, end of quote, full stop . decided that these territories should be annexed to ukraine on february 21, 2014

of this event, because 98 years ago on this day on april 18 , 24, the presidium of the central executive committeee union of soviet socialist republics is the same one with a red hammer and sickle star, and under which many of us served, which we had on a military ticket, with which many of our victories were associated, that very flag is precisely this red one with a star hammer and sickle was armed over the reichstag was repulsed by the very army in which fought side by side against nazism. russian ukrainians, belarusians and other peoples of the soviet union and in fact it is very symbolic that now, 98 years later, when our country no longer lives under this banner, it is nonetheless under the state banner. how to say it? it nevertheless overshadows our history. our mentality overshadows our feelings of historical justice, it also overshadows the understanding of what we are doing, in particular, what we are doing now as part of a special military operation in ukraine, and therefore it is no coincidence that over plant ilyich mariupol whose territory has already been liberated from the heirs of

committee. this information is central to our committee's inquiry. mr. navarro refused to comply, making a cursory claim of executive privilege. there are many reasons why this blanket assertion of executive privilege lacks merit. as a matter of law and as a matter of common sense. most fundamentally, neither the incumbent or the former president has asserted privilege regarding mr. navarro's testimony or document production to the committee. he has no unilateral authority to assert privilege himself. beyond that foundational fawn, he has spoken and written widely about the process subjects that are the focus of the subpoena. mr. navarro's eager to tell his story, as he sees it. so long as he can do so on his own terms. for example -- in 2020 and 2021, he published a three-part report on his website called the navarro report. he makes allegations about election fraud and have been debunked. furthermore, in november, 2021, he published a book called "in drum time -- trump time," he describes in detail actions he took to change the outcome of the election. he takes credit for working with steve bannon to concoct the -

otherwise the soviet comrades who are awaiting execution will be arrested even worse, but now there is nothing to pay for 70,000 to arrange an escape. the central committee understands, in whatever position, therefore, does not order the interrogators to take the money urgently. no time. how much money do you need, at least 120 thousand is it urgently within two or three days? we need a specialist. i’m upset, hello, any minute, the station clerk will be in the management of the station, they reported the sanction, pozharsky, they are waiting for you, please more likely time petrovich aha that they missed the volunteer swing, said they should be driven, finally teleponing every 5 minutes, sit down. from the station, pozharsky went to a patchwork hotel and took a room. and half an hour ago he came out and how he fell through the ground will appear. better tell to skewer our have the answers of the department. that's the point, shut up, peter arrested, shut up. identity not established, but please. an official from petersburg demands you all the same hour to himself. frightened, frightened, came to you himself and demanded only one glass of hot ice tea. let

executive director of the renew america movement. it wasn't knowable at the time but turns out that monday's opinion, ruling by a federal judge in central california was just ignition fuel for the committee'srger argument they're making. let me read from the opinion that started the week. i don't have it. here it is. judge carter says if eastman and trump's plan worked it would have ended the peaceful transition of power under the constitution. that is the reason for liz cheney's role as vice chair, the animating sort of cause of her departure from the good graces from the current republican elected leaders in washington and got a turbo boost from judge carter this week. >> that's how i view this week especially seeing the work of the committee kick into full gear but i think this putt the fuel in a lot of lawmakers' fire as they are determined to close up the loose ends. people like ivanka trump, jared kushner, dan scavino and try to wrap up the work as they feverishly moving to try to get to public hearings in may and this ruling that we saw from judge carter helped amplify and support the pressure campaign that some lawmakers have been waging against the doj to speed up the work to take