ceqa guidelines clearly establish once a project is approved, no further ceqa review is needed unlessther discretionary approval is required so we are not permitted to reopen the eastern neighborhoods eir in the absence of a change to the area plan. the plan eir was never challenged after the certification in 2008. nothing in ceqa or guidelines suggest a eir has a expiration gate date. if it were true conditions changed streamlining for infill project require a narrowed project specific environmental document not a whole sale disregard the prior eir. now i'll turn over to elana calying. >> thank you lisa. good afternoon president breed, board members. my name is alana calgy and planning department staff. the department submitted written response to appeal february 6 and like to address a few topics from the response now. first, the project is eligible for ceqa streamlines. meets ceqa section 15183.3 and therefore considered eligible for ceqa streamlines as a infill project. as addressed in the initial stud a, the project is in a 65 x height bulk district and the project spaunsher requ

ceqa guidelines clearly establish once a project is approved, no further ceqa review is needed unless further discretionary approval is required so we are not permitted to reopen the eastern neighborhoods eir in the absence of a change to the area plan. the plan eir was never challenged after the certification in 2008. nothing in ceqa or guidelines suggest a eir has a expiration gate date. if it were true conditions changed streamlining for infill project require a narrowed project specific environmental document not a whole sale disregard the prior eir. now i'll turn over to elana calying. >> thank you lisa. good afternoon president breed, board members. my name is alana calgy and planning department staff. the department submitted written response to appeal february 6 and like to address a few topics from the response now. first, the project is eligible for ceqa streamlines. meets ceqa section 15183.3 and therefore considered eligible for ceqa streamlines as a infill project. as addressed in the initial stud a, the project is in a 65 x height bulk district and the project spaunsher

the houses considered a historical resource for the purposes of ceqa the project was issued a ceqa categoricalcategorical assumption. buildings on the subject in opposite block faces are generally two-three-story residential buildings during architectural styles as well as one-story garage structures. the immediately adjacent property to the west at 477 hickory is a three-story single-family house in the immediately adjacent property to the east is a good lot developed with a 12 unit apartment building that fronts on oak street and features an open yard along the hickory street frontage. the immediately adjacent property to the reader are south of the subject property is a three-story two unit residential building owned by the dr requester. the department has received three letters of support for the project. one of which is from an adjacent neighbor and another of which is from a neighbor in the same block. since the packets were distributed last week the department has received four e-mails success in opposition to the project. i would like to note that in late january a complaint was made t

so the $75,000 bc therefore ceqa hrd consultants. this is all sold related to the bond initiatives. we anticipate that just with general workload and if there's a number priority projects that come through the departments, that we may need to hire ceqa consultants to help us with preservation work and i'll be on an as needed basis. again these are generally projects that are user 100% affordable housing or there were some sort of public or city program that is meant to serve the public good and so there's ashley streamlined to the process and we want to be able to respond in a quick manner. preservation public education is probably the best way to explain this but this includes the [inaudible] program we've talked about in the past. your expanding that to also look at website whether it's through video or oral histories or other types of interpretation and we do have those funding this year and next year later to that work. the additional survey contracts that - excuse me - arthur was in the previous slide. this is the money i was referring to for the citywide survey program. this $

so the $75,000 bc therefore ceqa hrd consultants. this is all sold related to the bond initiatives. we anticipate that just with general workload and if there's a number priority projects that come through the departments, that we may need to hire ceqa consultants to help us with preservation work and i'll be on an as needed basis. again these are generally projects that are user 100% affordable housing or there were some sort of public or city program that is meant to serve the public good and so there's ashley streamlined to the process and we want to be able to respond in a quick manner. preservation public education is probably the best way to explain this but this includes the [inaudible] program we've talked about in the past. your expanding that to also look at website whether it's through video or oral histories or other types of interpretation and we do have those funding this year and next year later to that work. the additional survey contracts that - excuse me - arthur was in the previous slide. this is the money i was referring to for the citywide survey program. this $

april and 3326 mission street to april 13, 2015, item 3 for the academy of art university adoption of ceqa finding is proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. items 4 ab ac adoption of

draft environmental impact report or draft eir pursuant to the california environmental quality act or ceqa and san francisco's local procedures for implementing procedures the item before you to receive the comme

for ceqa the determination porn impact is whether or not it maturely impairs the 02 voting of a resourcethe end of the day is it still qualify for whatever historical designation that it has. so with regard to the project and the demo in the new construction, the staff and family historic district to be a bible is worth district that is still maintains its own stability for the national register. >> can i ask that you make that judgment? because it seems to me if you completely in this rate the ship building process that was present there, how do you make a judgment that is not significant? in a shipbuilding district? >> it is fair. i think it's difficult to look at the site when you're only looking at the forest city portion of the site. one of the key things that historic district has-it's a pretty vast historic district in terms of size and in terms of complexity. so when you look at how the shipbuilding operations happens, there was a lot of movement between the pieces and parts that there were also a lot of buildings that were commonly built a mentor down and built and then torn dow

form of transportation to create an administrator fee for various sections of planning code and make ceqahtsd and determinations. >> supervisor cohen my understanding you have amendments. >> thank you for recognizing me colleagues we want to briefing present to you some legislation that was sponsored by our former colleague supervisor avalos i sent picked up as a sponsor and want to recognize any co-sponsor supervisor sheehy so the the item before you establishes the transportation demand management or tdm program spoken a lot about it earlier item item 27 i think that is a fact we've acknowledged and accepted that will 10 thousand new people will be arriving in san francisco every year and projected the city will add one and 90 thousand jobs and one hundred homes 2040 that's why we embarked on the tps when is a multi-agency effort to improve the transportation so we may accommodate this new growth the tps has 3 commons first the transportation steering committee's sustainability fees the board of supervisors took action last year the second element we have replaced our level of service a

authorize the department of building inspection to issue administrative subpoenas and a date with the ceqa determination and supervisor peskin. >> thank you, madam president colleagues thank you for your unanimous support last week and note the coronation of a number of sro hotel owners and want to represent that i'll continue to work with the community and make revisions if necessary over time. >> thank you supervisor peskin and madam clerk i had requested that i be added at a co-sponsor to this legislation. >> thank you, madam president. >> thank you colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the ordinance finally passes unanimously next item. >> >> an ordinance to amend the administrative code to set the functions terms and administrative support for the department of health as the section adopted as part of section i general municipal election same house, same call? objection the ordinance passes anonymously on the first reading next item, please. >> item 15 a resolution for the nominations of dorian united states air force as a county officer supervisor pesk

authorize the department of building inspection to issue administrative subpoenas and a date with the ceqa determination and supervisor peskin. >> thank you, madam president colleagues thank you for your unanimous support last week and note the coronation of a number of sro hotel owners and want to represent that i'll continue to work with the community and make revisions if necessary over time. >> thank you supervisor peskin and madam clerk i had requested that i be added at a co-sponsor to this legislation. >> thank you, madam president. >> thank you colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the ordinance finally passes unanimously next item. >> >> an ordinance to amend the administrative code to set the functions terms and administrative support for the department of health as the section adopted as part of section i general municipal election same house, same call? objection the ordinance passes anonymously on the first reading next item, please. >> item 15 a resolution for the nominations of dorian united states air force as a county officer supervisor pesk

please ass and those comprise the person's interested in the adopted midst negative declaration under ceqaor the promotion project on market street, items 43, 44, 45 are the motions associated with that appeal. >> colleagues he understand the appellants are withdrawn the appeal recommended to the negative declaration for 950 through 974 market street can i entertain a motion to adopt items 43 and table 44 and 45? move forward by supervisor sheehy - i got that seconded by supervisor tang is there any public comment on this particular item next year please come forward >> hello supervisors my name is bryan the director of the key foundation here in san francisco and here to represent the appellants t gi p and the saint james and thank you supervisor jane kim for your leadership through this sometimes difficult process we've been able to create a compton transgender cultural district the first transgender legal district in the world that as profound profound accomplishment i thank everyone for your support and thank you to joel for engaging in this process with us and thank you for your gift

lindsey noted it is gone through 4 categorical exemption review not considered a historic resource by ceqawent through the previous permit process and we decided to modify the front elevation to bring in more light with the existing smaller 8 windows were not adequate to bring in light of the living space of second floor and the two kids bedrooms at the third floor the genesis for the redesign trying to maximize light into the space once we were working with the rdt as noted we received rounds of comments and raised the ceiling up 18 inches to provide more cement and increased the wiechth property line walls to create for massing under to minimize the windows in addition, we lightened the window frames and the adjacent panels as you can see during the neighborhood meeting 5 meetings with the neighborhood with mark and kate but adjacent neighborhood to doors down to the south as well those meetings we proposed to add a cornice we are happy to do that was a strong point made by them to help to 250i got neighboring buildings and in addition adding to the window frames to create a shadow line

i addressed i'll defer to the city attorney to discuss the ceqa and the historic fees i can note in thevey information there was an error in the original reading that was provided so there was never a 3 t s assigned to the property actually a 7 n in the historic resource code in addition information and study what was listed on the website was under the soma it was not correct or the dualing information. >> deputy city attorney mirena burns. i can address the standard of that is applied not decision making regarding whether this is a historic resource the heritage letter i've not seen but, but it is incorrect standard of review is no a fair argument test there are cases that have been published in several years that all state that when our making the disconnection or whether or not sometimes are a historic resource before the question of the impacts just whether or not the building is a historic resource that is actually looked at under the substantial evidence standard so from the city has substantial evidence to support it's finding that the building is not a historic resource than th

msly. >> item 3 9 amend the planning code to allow amusic arquaid in south of market and afirm the ceqa determination and make the appropriate findings. >> same house same call? without objection the ordnance passed on the first reading. >> item 40 is anend environment ced to upgrade of municipal buildings. >> same house same call. without objection the ordinance passed on the first reading. please call item 41 and 42 together. >> item 41 amend the planning administrative and health code to wave the linkage fee and affordable housing requirement and alternative water supply requirement to create exemptions to reduce the transferability development right for project located at 950-974 market street in san francisco in exchange for dedication of real property at 180 jones street to the san francisco mayor's office of housing and community development at no cost and approve a payment of approximately 11.25 $11.25 millions to 180 jones street to establish the one 80 jones street fund and sapt a 2 poilt $7 million gift to affordable housing fund and accept a $300 thousand gift to the city to

with sfmta for the approvals for the state of california through the brt and just president elect the ceqa documentation that that and ready to assist in terms of design as that project move forward the vision zero ramps we're not clear sure you're clear port of planning and the project development the areas with the freeways touch on the city streets are the areas we're focusing on in the planning staple for it that and also listed the central subway that is phase three and prepared to assist us at the mta as we moved in the development let's talk about the procurement details we issued an r f q, 43 qualification statements we did something different than in the past the unbundled types of expertise we need i'll show you a slide that shows up up to many major categories there it is a list of a lot of types of expertise in particular the areas that are new for example, public-private partnerships and asking for expertise to help the city moved on some of the major capital projects moving forward within a laundry list of consultants we can use on on call basis for the program let's talk abo

i addressed i'll defer to the city attorney to discuss the ceqa and the historic fees i can note in thevey information there was an error in the original reading that was provided so there was never a 3 t s assigned to the property actually a 7 n in the historic resource code in addition information and study what was listed on the website was under the soma it was not correct or the dualing information. >> deputy city attorney mirena burns. i can address the standard of that is applied not decision making regarding whether this is a historic resource the heritage letter i've not seen but, but it is incorrect standard of review is no a fair argument test there are cases that have been published in several years that all state that when our making the disconnection or whether or not sometimes are a historic resource before the question of the impacts just whether or not the building is a historic resource that is actually looked at under the substantial evidence standard so from the city has substantial evidence to support it's finding that the building is not a historic resource than th

april and 3326 mission street to april 13, 2015, item 3 for the academy of art university adoption of ceqa finding is proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. items 4 ab ac adoption of planning code changes by the planning department recommended to the academy is proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. item case 2016 - adoption of ms. hayward related to the academy of art university is proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. case 2012 academy of art university tech changes planning code tech changes also proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. items 5 abc d f and g for case - at 2209 van ness avenue and octavia street and pine street, stuttering street and bush street relatively are all proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. item 6 townsend street is proposed to proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. items 7 for case - 466 townsend street also proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. further commissioners under our regular calendar we received a request for case folsom street a proposed for continuance may i have no other items proposed for continuance and there are no

form of transportation to create an administrator fee for various sections of planning code and make ceqahtsd and determinations. >> supervisor cohen my understanding you have amendments. >> thank you for recognizing me colleagues we want to briefing present to you some legislation that was sponsored by our former colleague supervisor avalos i sent picked up as a sponsor and want to recognize any co-sponsor supervisor sheehy so the the item before you establishes the transportation demand management or tdm program spoken a lot about it earlier item item 27 i think that is a fact we've acknowledged and accepted that will 10 thousand new people will be arriving in san francisco every year and projected the city will add one and 90 thousand jobs and one hundred homes 2040 that's why we embarked on the tps when is a multi-agency effort to improve the transportation so we may accommodate this new growth the tps has 3 commons first the transportation steering committee's sustainability fees the board of supervisors took action last year the second element we have replaced our level of service a

with sfmta for the approvals for the state of california through the brt and just president elect the ceqa documentation that that and ready to assist in terms of design as that project move forward the vision zero ramps we're not clear sure you're clear port of planning and the project development the areas with the freeways touch on the city streets are the areas we're focusing on in the planning staple for it that and also listed the central subway that is phase three and prepared to assist us at the mta as we moved in the development let's talk about the procurement details we issued an r f q, 43 qualification statements we did something different than in the past the unbundled types of expertise we need i'll show you a slide that shows up up to many major categories there it is a list of a lot of types of expertise in particular the areas that are new for example, public-private partnerships and asking for expertise to help the city moved on some of the major capital projects moving forward within a laundry list of consultants we can use on on call basis for the program let's talk abo

street the bartlett and more specifically defined in the ordinance summarizing the planting under the ceqa to make the findings of consistency with the general plan and the policies of planning code section one 0 one point one our perpetrators are diana at the office of economic workforce development and diego sanchez legislative analyst an unwarranted planner at the planning department. >> oh, and to have supervisor hillary ronen. >> thank you. good evening office from hillary ronen just wanted to make a couple of introductory remarks the latino cultural district attracts people from all over the world to have photographs of the murals and buy a cup of coffee at the phil's coffee and line up for ice cream but the filipino cultural district is far more a regional hub for the latino folks 8 thousand lairpdz e laipz have been displaced and latino families are coming back to go to church or pick up a copy of the local newspaper or to pat rinses one of the many restaurants an area that many mom and pop shops have strurnd to stay open not because of declining sales but evictions and finally the

authorize the department of building inspection to issue administrative subpoenas and a date with the ceqa determination and supervisor peskin. >> thank you, madam president colleagues thank you for your unanimous support last week and note the coronation of a number of sro hotel owners and want to represent that i'll continue to work with the community and make revisions if necessary over time. >> thank you supervisor peskin and madam clerk i had requested that i be added at a co-sponsor to this legislation. >> thank you, madam president. >> thank you colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the ordinance finally passes unanimously next item. >> >> an ordinance to amend the administrative code to set the functions terms and administrative support for the department of health as the section adopted as part of section i general municipal election same house, same call? objection the ordinance passes anonymously on the first reading next item, please. >> item 15 a resolution for the nominations of dorian united states air force as a county officer supervisor pesk

with sfmta for the approvals for the state of california through the brt and just president elect the ceqa documentation that that and ready to assist in terms of design as that project move forward the vision zero ramps we're not clear sure you're clear port of planning and the project development the areas with the freeways touch on the city streets are the areas we're focusing on in the planning staple for it that and also listed the central subway that is phase three and prepared to assist us at the mta as we moved in the development let's talk about the procurement details we issued an r f q, 43 qualification statements we did something different than in the past the unbundled types of expertise we need i'll show you a slide that shows up up to many major categories there it is a list of a lot of types of expertise in particular the areas that are new for example, public-private partnerships and asking for expertise to help the city moved on some of the major capital projects moving forward within a laundry list of consultants we can use on on call basis for the program let's talk abo

patch association and the potrero boosters the zoning effect didn't take effect but waited a complete ceqa analyze that must take place a rezoning action that's why we're here one the key pieces of feedback in 2014 to make sure that note every building was built 90 feet the proposed project is a tight plan with the building from 50 to 90 feet and open space we said to be responsive to the community feedback about a variety of building height from 20th and 22 and potrero hill there is a back and forth project from the potrero hill this view from 20th and third about the project and here's the view with the project i know the view if 20th street and further up the hill without the project and with the project and finally a view from 22 and wisconsin without the project and with the project additional features include the buildings totally more than three hundred and 80 thousand square feet building two and 12 on the left and right respectfully the proposed project site is oriented around the historic building with the key features with the rehabilitated buildings and open spaces the land pla

authorize the department of building inspection to issue administrative subpoenas and a date with the ceqa determination and supervisor peskin. >> thank you, madam president colleagues thank you for your unanimous support last week and note the coronation of a number of sro hotel owners and want to represent that i'll continue to work with the community and make revisions if necessary over time. >> thank you supervisor peskin and madam clerk i had requested that i be added at a co-sponsor to this legislation. >> thank you, madam president. >> thank you colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the ordinance finally passes unanimously next item. >> >> an ordinance to amend the administrative code to set the functions terms and administrative support for the department of health as the section adopted as part of section i general municipal election same house, same call? objection the ordinance passes anonymously on the first reading next item, please. >> item 15 a resolution for the nominations of dorian united states air force as a county officer supervisor pesk

april and 3326 mission street to april 13, 2015, item 3 for the academy of art university adoption of ceqa finding is proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. items 4 ab ac adoption of planning code changes by the planning department recommended to the academy is proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. item case 2016 - adoption of ms. hayward related to the academy of art university is proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. case 2012 academy of art university tech changes planning code tech changes also proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. items 5 abc d f and g for case - at 2209 van ness avenue and octavia street and pine street, stuttering street and bush street relatively are all proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. item 6 townsend street is proposed to proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. items 7 for case - 466 townsend street also proposed for continuance to july 27, 2017. further commissioners under our regular calendar we received a request for case folsom street a proposed for continuance may i have no other items proposed for continuance and there are no

draft environmental impact report or draft eir pursuant to the california environmental quality act or ceqa and san francisco's local procedures for implementing procedures the item before you to receive the comments i'm joined by my colleagues rick senior planner and alien inspirational planner and the technical specialist members of the team and the project sponsor is forest city and the port of san francisco are also presents the project sponsor kelly for forest city will provide a brief overall of the project. >> overview of the project. >> thank you melinda good afternoon commissioner president hillis and members of the commission thank you jonas my name is kelly with forest city and along with the port of san francisco we're project sponsors for the pier 70 mixed use project we'reer were recently before you in november of 2016 for the informational presentation to the commission on the overview site plan as you recall it has been in the making for 10 years with the master plan the mayor and the board issued an issuance for forest city forest city has been working on the pier 70 projec

street the bartlett and more specifically defined in the ordinance summarizing the planting under the ceqa to make the findings of consistency with the general plan and the policies of planning code section one 0 one point one our perpetrators are diana at the office of economic workforce development and diego sanchez legislative analyst an unwarranted planner at the planning department. >> oh, and to have supervisor hillary ronen. >> thank you. good evening office from hillary ronen just wanted to make a couple of introductory remarks the latino cultural district attracts people from all over the world to have photographs of the murals and buy a cup of coffee at the phil's coffee and line up for ice cream but the filipino cultural district is far more a regional hub for the latino folks 8 thousand lairpdz e laipz have been displaced and latino families are coming back to go to church or pick up a copy of the local newspaper or to pat rinses one of the many restaurants an area that many mom and pop shops have strurnd to stay open not because of declining sales but evictions and finally the

with sfmta for the approvals for the state of california through the brt and just president elect the ceqadocumentation that that and ready to assist in terms of design as that project move forward the vision zero ramps we're not clear sure you're clear port of planning and the project development the areas with the freeways touch on the city streets are the areas we're focusing on in the planning staple for it that and also listed the central subway that is phase three and prepared to assist us at the mta as we moved in the development let's talk about the procurement details we issued an r f q, 43 qualification statements we did something different than in the past the unbundled types of expertise we need i'll show you a slide that shows up up to many major categories there it is a list of a lot of types of expertise in particular the areas that are new for example, public-private partnerships and asking for expertise to help the city moved on some of the major capital projects moving forward within a laundry list of consultants we can use on on call basis for the program let's talk abou