21151.9, and ceqa guidelines section 15155. before we start came back recognition commissioner commissioner stacy. >> thank you president paulson i said lying took recuse on that item and the element aethsdz office is a block away and a rule that for lease hold it is clearance and evidenced of this development have the financial impacts on their lease that i should ask to be recused so in the abundance of caution like to ask the commission to recrews me and we feed to have a vote to authorize the individual and take that motion to that effect motion to accept the recusal of commissioner stacy for item 9. >> i'll move and a motion and second. >> roll call. >> president paulson, aye. >> commissioner maxwell, aye. >> commissioner ajami, aye. >> and and i have three i's. >> commissioner stacy has been recused and step out as we hear item 9 we have - i guess we're ready for item 9. >> yes. commissioner steve richie for water? one of our standard water supplies this was one that has been revised based on the new numbers included. thi

affirming the planning department ceqa determination. item 2 is resolution transmitting to the california coastal commission for review and certification an amendment to the implementation program portion of the certified local coastal program for the creation of wawona street and 45th avenue cultural center special use district on the parcel located at 2700-45th avenue and affirming the planning department determination under ceqa. >> thank you mr. clerk. we are joined by supervisor engardio representing district 4, the sponsor of this legislation. welcome supervisor. >> thank you. good afternoon chair melgar, president peskin and supervisor preston. last month on october 30 i brought forward file number 230505 to allow for the redevelopment of the irish cultural center project at 2700-45th avenue. today this committee is revisit the item. after hearing from sf planning on proposed planning code zoning map and local coastal program amendments and the sponsor regarding the proposed project, i ask the committee to allow for a second read

developments in those special use disricatess to 3,000 square feet gross flor area and affirm the ceqa determination and make the appropriate findings. item 36, is resolution to urge the city attorney and mayor to request the state department of housing and community development extend the deadlines for required action in hcd policy and practice review to insure all of san francisco extensive collaborative work to further housing development does not lead to decertification of san francisco housing element to revise and correct hcd policy and practice review to be consistent with all policies in san francisco housing element to include policy and action related to affordable housing and equity as well as the city legal obligations to affirmatively firth r fair housing and consistent with san francisco status as a chartered city with the power with local action and setting as part of the housing element implementation the policy to address the dual goals of production of new housing and preservation of existing housing. >> thank you madam clerk. supervisor melgar. >> thank you so much p

um, it's outlined in the ceqa considerations. they need to be, you know, feasible they need to meet most of the project objectives, but not all. and they need to achieve, um, most of the project sponsors objectives. so we looked extensively at many, many alternatives with the sponsor. and as you see in the analysis, there were some alternatives that were rejected because they don't meet the sea level rise objectives. and some a lot of the site constraints. and that's where, you know, the alternatives considered but rejected. looked at all those options. and um, who makes that final decision. is it the planning commission. it's the planning commission. when they choose to adopt the eir as adequate and complete and that they feel like that the facts are, are are complete and correct, i see. okay. thank you. thank you, commissioner foley. yeah. uh, commissioner baldauf, i just i just want to put some color on this from when we when we had this hearing, i think whatever. six months ago. um, but but we beat this up pretty bad, uh, bec

the planning department has determined that the project is exempt from the ceqa. the commission will rely on that determination to make its decision on this action. >> afternoon commissioners. general manager for infrastructure. construction fract at the san antonio pump station. we followed a normal procurement process. three bids so this is to award big valley electric and for their bid in the amount under $9 million and just over 3 years. >> thank you. is there any discussion about this contract award? any questions among commissioners? if not, can i have a motion? let's open up to public comment. >> members of the public present to provide comment on item 8. seeing none. >> seeing no comment, request a motion and second to approve item 8, please. >> move to approve. >> second. >> roll call, please. >> president paulson, aye. rivera, aye. maxwell, stepped out. ajami, aye. stacy, aye. you have four ayes. >> okay. item 9, please. could you read item 9 madam secretary? >> item 9, public hearing to consider and possible action to adopt revised rules and regulations

plaque and it is permitting revocation and restoration for all minor encroachment permits and planning ceqa determination. this is also agendaized for potential consideration tomorrow at the board. >> thank you. we heard this a couple times already. i want to thank above all beth rubenstein with the public works d. and the city attorney, christopher tam and the folks at dpw who put in time and energy to get this right. i want to acknowledge stefani, ronen, engardio and chan for coexperienceship there is still work to get it right but love our neighborhood's program. much will be done throughout regulations we have a commitment from the department to be transparent and collaborative about regulations. i cannot stress how important this is for my district and other districts. because one thing that make san francisco strong and wonderful is the love that the neighbors have for each other and the neighborhoods and the public space. this is an attempt to cut down the bureaucracy and support neighbors who want to plant gardens and want to paint benches and have little library and all of those th

planning and feasibility analysis, basis for technical requirements, basis for commercial program and ceqa and nepa process consideration. our recommendation also includes a waver to the prop l policy that requires certificate of commission of funds . the project sponsor demonstrates all fund sources required to fully fund the phase or phases are committed to this project. we are recommending this waver to enable this project to continue advancing and prevent a gap in the work given relative lack of other fund sources available. and in recognition of the scale and impact and joint development project delivery method which mta has not used before, the ta will perform and enhance level of oversight. and this is the first of three caltrain allocation request today. this request seeking combined total of $4.5 million out of prop l funds in san francisco member contribution to caltrain fiscal year 24 capital budget for state of good repair projects. we expect caltrain to submit future prop l allocation request for $462 thousand to complete san francisco $5 million contribution. san mateo and sa

planning and feasibility analysis, basis for technical requirements, basis for commercial program and ceqa and nepa process consideration. our recommendation also includes a waver to the prop l policy that requires certificate of commission of funds . the project sponsor demonstrates all fund sources required to fully fund the phase or phases are committed to this project. we are recommending this waver to enable this project to continue advancing and prevent a gap in the work given relative lack of other fund sources available. and in recognition of the scale and impact and joint development project delivery method which mta has not used before, the ta will perform and enhance level of oversight. and this is the first of three caltrain allocation request today. this request seeking combined total of $4.5 million out of prop l funds in san francisco member contribution to caltrain fiscal year 24 capital budget for state of good repair projects. we expect caltrain to submit future prop l allocation request for $462 thousand to complete san francisco $5 million contribution. san mateo and sa

developments in those special use disricatess to 3,000 square feet gross flor area and affirm the ceqa determination and make the appropriate findings. item 36, is resolution to urge the city attorney and mayor to request the state department of housing and community development extend the deadlines for required action in hcd policy and practice review to insure all of san francisco extensive collaborative work to further housing development does not lead to decertification of san francisco housing element to revise and correct hcd policy and practice review to be consistent with all policies in san francisco housing element to include policy and action related to affordable housing and equity as well as the city legal obligations to affirmatively firth r fair housing and consistent with san francisco status as a chartered city with the power with local action and setting as part of the housing element implementation the policy to address the dual goals of production of new housing and preservation of existing housing. >> thank you madam clerk. supervisor melgar. >> thank you so much p

and a efficientlying the ceqa findings and various different findings. madam chair this has been agendized and may be sent to tomorrow's board of supervisors meeting. >> yes thank you, i promise we will be done with this some day. but you will remember that we continued this from last week at the request of president peskin. in addition to that, the planning department has some requested amendmented that were heard by planning commission. i will turn it over to president peskin to make remarks first and have you present, mr. star. okay, president. >> i don't know that i have anything new. the amendment that's were made last week, some of them were substancetive and needed to be heard here. i don't know if they needed to be they were discussed at the planning commission. but in the interim, i think there are a number of amendments that i guess aaron star, emailed some of them to us last thursday. i admit i did not put my eyes on them until today. but in any event they're deemed to be substancestive so we cannot vote on them today. >> okay, mr. star. >> so

we are finalizing the entitlements and finalizing the ceqa documents now. those will come forward you as the board of supervisors likely in february. this has been one of the most difficult projects i have 25 years in government to work on, but again, as a city we are doing our best to advance the vision that this body and the board of supervisors helped us develop for this site. here is a example of the site. we have done significant outreach. we have a working group that we meet with monthly. we go to community meetings. the outreach team on this project has been outstanding. this shows a example of bryant and 17th of the proposed project. you'll see the 3 story bus yard, the housing proposal on bryant street which would be the first phase of housing and two additional projects that would be developed on the roof both workforce housing and senior and multifamily housing that would come as funding is secured and here's a example of the project in the evening. on the joint development, potrero is the first example doing a p3 project. presidio yard we contin

from a ceqa perspective we completed the nop. we amount draft will be out for circulation in the spring. and we look to certification in the spring and or the summer of 2024. hi want to do is provide unite here local two of the opportunity to speak to the benefit. joining of the village and the need for the union all. >> thank you. >> thank you. representing the members of my urine local 2 we have 15,000 members. we report the hotel workers. foodservice. gaming workers and we are proud to be a part of this project. members have been proud to call our union hall home for decade in the tenderloin on 200 block of golden gate we own building and property it is in need of repair the old building over 100 years old. and we are a proust members struggled and carved out a standard of living. can afford to live in the city to put, way mony for kids and send them to college. food on the table. so00 autoability for our union to -- develop a hall. is difficult. this project for us is an opportunity to -- develop a new hall. to do so in an in

we have see ceqa documents, an active plan. this is six years of effort. three on planning, three on delay. we came through with some of the most complex events, apec, the third annual and fabulous event that keeps growing. pop-ups on plaza. we continue to work to bring people here to show what beautiful promenades and public facilities we have and it's showing. the numbers are here for us. i want to speak about southern waterfront activation. southern waterfront is a jewel in our necklace of public places. we need to remember that and continue to seek to improve the properties so we make meaningful contribution to the area. we aim to make it a destination and we've made progress this yore. we had rec and park bringing people in to the center center. this is the second time of the music festival at pier 8 o. it's an exciting festival. building 49 activation is moving for the park. this will be an important public amenity and we've done a lot of exempts in krenco park. it took a white to figure out how to pay for it baw it's a great facility due to all that

and affirm the ceqa determination and make the appropriate finds. >> supervisor melgar, chair of land transportation committee, the floor is yours. >> thank you so much president peskin. colleagues, this item has gotten a lot of press over the last few months. it has been a pretty heavy lift to work with all of the stakeholders on a matter that pertains to the processes of our 7 by 7 square mile city with a code that is extremely complicated and that has evolved over time. we have been working closely with our city attorney, the planning department, the mayor's office and colleagues on the land use committee to come out with something that is true to the letter of the law and intent of our housing element, which we approved unanimously and also meets the technical compliance of the various pieces of legislation that have passed and signed into law by our governor this past year and there are many many pieces of legislation. it has been a complicated exercise. never the less, we were able to send this piece of the committee report yesterday from the land use transportation committee, h

planning and feasibility analysis, basis for technical requirements, basis for commercial program and ceqan. our recommendation also includes a waver to the prop l policy that requires certificate of commission of funds . the project sponsor demonstrates all fund sources required to fully fund the phase or phases are committed to this project. we are recommending this waver to enable this project to continue advancing and prevent a gap in the work given relative lack of other fund sources available. and in recognition of the scale and impact and joint development project delivery method which mta has not used before, the ta will perform and enhance level of oversight. and this is the first of three caltrain allocation request today. this request seeking combined total of $4.5 million out of prop l funds in san francisco member contribution to caltrain fiscal year 24 capital budget for state of good repair projects. we expect caltrain to submit future prop l allocation request for $462 thousand to complete san francisco $5 million contribution. san mateo and santa clara county are making a

this would not apply to more standard ceqa rated category a single family homes. those are not capture in the the new penalty. it is important to note this is not retroactive it states can be assessed 2 that occurred after the affective date of the ordinance. april 28 of this year. so an important distinction not when did we issue the notice when the violation occurred to the best we can assess that information. >> is it for your information the other penalty that was added was -- up to 250 thousand dollars penalty. for the unauthorized removal of dwelling or unauthorized creation of 4 or more. after the case report for this case we could not property then. but what was passed around are the upon 11 factors that the planning commission did adopt for consider when asession them. i wanted you to have this for your information since we could not put it in your packet before. so similarly, this ordinance requires the planning the h pc to take 2 actions within 12 months of the date. one is -- an action of -- adopting definitions the terms. and then once they are adopte