this action constitutes the approval action for the project for the purposes of ceqa, pursuant to sanfternoon, commissioners. >> i'm shelby the prosecuting force campus on 200 marin and here to request your properties for the negative declaration and approve this project to plead for those of you who don't know who the city distributionhe san department that is what you see on the tracks city for people maintaining the cities and counties decide water system our 12 hundred miles of in the meta program why are we can÷é those faciliti? little existing facilities for the construction in the 60s exceeded the useful san francisco had population growth resulting and as you can see is from the we're fabricating this mask war for theable nothing sufficient to maintain the vehicles we have overcrowd offices to current existing campuses wasin and cross traffic at the campus we're going to solve all those o marin and in good company with the puc west of chavez and on the yards on the other see a closures look bounds by■ chavez and west 200 marin dead i understand on the south side and way to the

part of ceqa this is less thans is a new exemption brand new exemption not aroundlong.ct i believe our project was probably in the first 10 projects brought exemption so the way it is me i'm not a ceqa experts tell what they call the they required n program something less than an adopt and req m m rp it is different. what we've done and theprurmd to be preliminaries after ceqa were completedese exemption was approved and really those both the m rp the protective measures trying to requirements and then build in whatever superstars we want in there for a completes program. noty ceqa to put together and adopt byies rather was somethingf having requirements we had that from beginning. >> we - shouldn't have called is confusing to call that an m multiple voices.) >> a specific thing. >> one question i h this i'm assuming i have so somehow we need to this data we can track we're doing all those but for clarification for one second i th i got. >> okay. thank you for that. >> we're required to ultiple voices.) >> and you're not required- >> (multiple voices). >> because we wan

in place and staff put together the ceqa op and is monitoring protocol called itge m m rp rather thanection mandatory and it is confusing not need to be adopted pid the permanentny and in the ceqa adoption implementing agency not thed agency the led agency is stan law cie so assumed as stated in the revised version assumed responsibilities for implementing the monitoring requirement associated wh the permit and the protection measureme i into the mitigation reporting plan we have. for this project. that. >> you're answering questions which is we pulled it off consent agenda maybe aer that asked question can comment on the. >> commissioner stacy. >> thank you for is presentation he did have■,hat question head h o time and that the program is a normal clash to everyone but paurlz a see measures are built in into the project so looks like a thorough review and i also um, wanted to thank you. the nonprofits and agencies there were a number of um, organizations involved they there is a motion on the table. working on this program is trusts and the tallying me river anis. >> (pig sound.) >>

adopt the final mitigated negative decm pursuant to the california environmental quality act (ceqa);project no.10037249, city distribution division (cdd) enue; and authorize staff to proceed with actions necessary to implement the to implement the to implement the project d7 including issuance of the notice-to-proceed for the construction phase pursuant to the construction manager/general contractor (cm/gc) contract no. wd-2879r. this action conspr action for the project for the purposes of ceqa, pursuant to san francisco administrative code section 31.04(h). >> slides please. commissioners. >> i'm shelby the force campus on 200 marin and here to request your properties for the- negative declaration and approve this project for those of you who don't know who the city distribution city they're the what you see on the tracks around the for people maintaining the cities and co water system our 12 hundred miles of pipelines meta program why are we can those fac existing facilities for the construction in 60s exceeded the useful life and growth resulting in overcrowded and as you can se

need those part of ceqa this is less than this is exemption brand new exemption not around long.bly in the first 10 projects brought into the new exeon so the way it is explained to me tell what they call the u can exemption. they required protection less than an adopt and required adoption like an m rp it is different. and so wha we've done and the consultant we exemption was approved and really those both the m m rp the protective measures trying to anticipate all those then build in whatever superstars we want to pit inre for a completes program. not something that of required by c and adopt by the led agencies er we were doing in anticipatin having requirements we had that from the beginning. w have called is that. >> it is confusing to m m rp. >> (multiple voices.) >> a scithing. >> one question i had i was doing this assuming i have collected a lot of data. somehow we need to make sure that alls data we can track how things are evolving as we're doing all those things but for thought you said - i got. >> okay. >> thank you that. >> we're required to monitoring. >> (multiple

of our meeting minutes from all hood working group meetings, as well as all the documents again to ceqaand entitlements are all there.we also proactively go out to in fact, we will be doing more this fall and always making sure that we give people in the public an rtunity to share if there are things they have questions about xor concerns about, that we address those either person or on the website in some way. >> for majority of the neighborhoods they have are there letters from these associiog or not approving or giving input feedback or just minutes of the meeting? >> many letters were submitted in entitlements and environmental review, but also we ie earlier this spring and received letters of of the community, friends of frag others, so yes, absolutely. >> thank you. my last question is, there were fourthe past five years. should we anticipate up soon or next year? how do you the project and do you think there will be a need for more modification for this? >> this should be the we will be moving into the project next year and so there will be a separate agreement withfor advisory

the others if we took it down we a 3 month ceqa process and so by keeping ita voluntary structura categorical exemption, so that is paare able to speed up the schedule. the other op that are critical to g at the same time. that is psych cafeteria that is connected to the new building but not in the new supplies food, the pharmacy and then-joe, what is the other function? so, they all support each other even though they are two structur the new building we built and finished in the older building we are renovatingism there is bridge that connects them and if you haven't been out there it is the flow of the physicians and nurses anand radiology and everything else that has to take , so the decision was to keep it, because wen't have any real estate available at this point on the acre campus, especially after the ilding was built on that parking lot. we have very little space were to take it down, build new, we have do temporary pharmacy, temporary facilities that would just go away when building was built so we are throwing away so we made a decision to keep it. on so many fronts so that is a e

if we take federal money has to go through ceqa an to be cleaned up and will be expensive.garden or retail is feasible. the mean time, the state of california seeing the problem throughout the ste ent has made a pot of money available for like this one to transition a bio fuel station on the west side of town, so it is a we have and you know, this gives us a opportunity to . so, what is before you today 20years as the clerk said, grant from the state to transition into bio requirement of the lease. in addition to that, the end of the lease which is the e doesn't, so i do think that hathis tires on --i have explored all i do-we are bringing in front of you today,is a good option. my fear is this, we have heard from some ofenvironmental groups who rather have this be then have a sale of i have the experience of side of the juvenile justice center that is empt now that has been plagued withfires, graffiti, garbage, and this site right the boarder of d8 and d7 is one of the most visible spots it is what every tourist bus s up twin peaks and i do not want to have we leave behind. that is also n

the others if we took it down we would have about month ceqa process and so by keeping it there structurhat is paperwork and we ar speed up the schedule. the other operational issues that are critical to keep four things futioning at the same time. that is psych emergency service, the cafeteria that is connected to the new building but not in the new buildingz0 that supplies food, the pharmacy and then-joe, what is the other function? so, they all support each other even though they are two structures. the new building we built and finished in 2015 and the older building we are renovatingism there is bridge that connects them and if you haven't been out there it is insightful to rouggoand see the flow of the physicians and nurses and lab work and radiology and everything else that has to take place betw buildings, so the decision was to keep it, because we any real estate available at this point on the ac campus, especially after the ilding ansactional research was built on that parking lot. we have very little space to do anythingsowere to take it down, build new, we have to do temporar

me minutes from all the neighborhood working group meetings, as well as all the dos ain related to ceqaents are all there. in addition, we also proactively go out to events throughout the year. in fbe doing more this fall and always making sure that in the public an opportunity to share if there are things they have questions about or concerns about, that we address those either there in person or on the ite some way. >> for example, every neighborhood--majority of the neighborhoods they have neighborhood associations. are there letters from these associations approving or not approving or giving input and feedback or just minutes of the meeting? >> many tte were submitted in support of entitlements and eniew,vinmbut also we applied for grant funding earlier this spring and received er support for that application from friends of franklin square being one example among others, so yes, absolutely. >> thank you. my last question iswere four modifications in the past five years. should we anticipate one coming up soon or next year? how do you see the project and do k thyoe will be a need f

we've received ceqa plan approved and we are now in i mentioned earlier, we have, the hilton hotel, that a bridge that connects our park and the hilton. we areon removing that and getting their needed appr be on the opposite side, when so as i noted, we are hopeful that everything we can release our bid docs later this fall for construction start in after lunar new year next year. south sunset clubhouse is about to go into advertisement and we will start our interior, improvements and some exters is a high level overview of our , and i just want to end with our cityws. we have a lot of them. i'm going to draw your trails. we are working on a partnersh to add nature exploration areas. we have four spaces identified. tenderloin rec, the crockernd at crocker, amazon, silver terrace and randolph bright. all will get an infusion of nature and then on the right, with peaks, we are in the middle of construction o excited. we think this this general obligation[s really helping us to continue reshaping our parkland and making sure everything is welcoming and these are our, i always first. this is

we've received ceqa clearance conceptn approved, and we are now in design portsmouth square.oned earlier, we have, a neighbor, the hilton hotel, that has a bridge that connects thee working with them on removing that and getting their needed approvals for what willsite b se bridge is removed. so as i noted, we are hopeful that everything is moving forward there and that we can release our bid docs later this fall for construction start in afr year h sunset clubhouse this is about to go into advertisement and we will start our interior, improvements and se exterior improvements as well. this is a high level overview of our project schedules, and i just want to end with our citywide lot of them. i'm going to draw your attention to the bottom two playgrounds and trails. we are working on a partnership with kaboom to add nature exploration area four spaces identified.c, t crocker purple playground at crocker, amazon, silver , and randolph bright. all four of those parks will of nature and new play elements, and then on the right, with trails as twin peaks, we are in the middle of

we've received ceqa clearance concept plan approved and we are now in design portsmouth square. neighbor, the hilton hotel, has a bridge that connects our park and the hilton. we are working with them on removing that approvals for what will be on the opposite side, when the bridge is removed. so as i noted, we is moving forward there and that we can release fall for construction start in after lunar new year next year to go into advertisement and we will start our interior, improvements and some exterior improvements as well. this is a our project schedules, and i just want to end with our citywide parks and programs. we have a lot of them. i'm going to draw your attention to the bottom two playgrounds and trails. we a<re working on a partnership with kaboom to add nature exploration areas. we have four spaces identified. tenderloin rec, the crocker purple playground at crocker, amazon, silver terrace and randolph bright. all four of those parks will get an infusion of nature and new play elements and then on the right, with trails as twin peaks, we are inthis peak, so we are

meeting minutes from all the neighborhood group meetings, as well as all the documents again related ceqaentitlements are all there. in addi proactively go out to events throughout in fact, we will be doing more this that we give people in the public an opportunity to share if ere about concerns about, that we address those either there in or on the website in some way. >> for example, ever neighborhoods they have are there letters from these associations approving or not e or giving input and feedback or n2ní >> many letters were submitted in and environmental review, but also we applied for grant is spring and received letters of support for that applicof the community, friends of franklin square being g others, so yes, absolutely. >> thank you. my n is, there were four modifications in the five years. should we anticipate one coming next year? how do you see oject and do you think there will be a need for >> this should be the last modifi moving into the project agreement next year and so a separate agreement with for advisory services tied to that the last for that. >> thank you. >>

instillation at the harvey milk the southwest corner of the intersection of as a landmark to affirm the ceqaination the appropriate findings. >> same house same call. next item. >> item 35, an amend the administrative code to prohibit the sale use of set rent for residential dwelling units in san francisco. >> thank you mandelman. colleagues, pleased this item sly recommended as well as cosponsored by all the members of the the full board. this ordinance will be the first local country to ban practice found artificially increasing rents and increasing the being held vacant. a new type oferanrevenue management software came to prominence largely because ofof ownership of multifamily housing by international real estate investors as wall sthousing business and have seen here locally. one company in dominate this industry, a company by a employee that company as the amazon of property management software saying indust ry". in the old days happened in a smoke filled back room estate owners share data into common data pot rents and occupancy terms. investigations found this amounts to new form of

baker at the southwest corner of the intersectn rket and castro streets as a landmark to affirm the ceqa appropriate findings. >> same house same call. the ordinances first reading. next item. >> item 35, an amend the administrative code to prohibit the sale use of mythric devices to set rent for residential dwelling units in san francisco. >> thank you colleagues, pleased this item was unanimously recommended as well as cosponsored by all the members of the land use committee to the full board. this ordinance will be the first local ordinance in the country to ban practice found to be artificially increasing rents and increasing the units that are being held vacant. a new type revenue management software came to prominence largely because ownership of multifamily housing by l real estate investors as wall street has ing business and have seen here locally. one company in particul has come to dominate this industry, a company alled real page described by a employee that company as the amazon operty management software sayingindust ry". in the old days collusion happened in a smoke filled

been a ceqa appeal filed on this project and it has been scheduled for the b september, followed by thearge project autho appeal at the board of appeals on october 9th. so appeal process, this proposed project at be vested through a building permit application in before the effective date of this legislation.kv$ there may also be other potentiallyed many of those are small enough to be counter and staff is just not aware of what those projects may be the department does ordinance. it is inconsistent w the general plan, and staff recommends that you adopt a recommendation of disapproval recognizes that the industry the real world application of what people consider as different than what we have in our current code an, as currently biotechnology actie definition of laboratory does not change the definition. it merely illustrates an of this or all of this is already covered definition, some examples of this medical research, food chain testing, fertility specia again all of this fits under the definition.e proposed amendment does not change the implementation here. additionally, this ame

if we take federal money has to go through ceqa an cleaned up and will be expensive.seeing the problem throughout the ste working with the federal government has made a pot of money available for owners like this one to trsi we don't have a bio fuel station on the have and you know, this gives us a opportunity to transition into that. so, what is before you today isr ■d that, it is a lease. predicated the clerk said, on acceptance of the grant from the state to transitio that is a requirement of the lease. in addition to that, the ase requires cleanup at the end of the lease which is so i do think that havid tires on thiso make--i have explored all the other options. i do-we are bringing in front of you day, i think it is a good my fear is this, we have heard from ronmental groups who have a have this be sale of can i have the experience of having juvenile justice center that is emy and owned by the city now that has been plagued withsquatters, fires, graffiti, garbage, and this site right at the boarder of d8 and d7 is one of the most vi■5si it is what every tourist

there has since been a ceqa appeal filed on this project scheduled for the board of supervisors in searge project authorization of appeals on october 9th. so whatever the outcome of osed project at 700 indiana would no be vested through a building permit application in time or before the effective date of this legislation. other potentially impacted projects, but most or many of those are small enough to be approved over the and staff is just not aware of what those projects may be or how many not supp. it is inconsistent with the general plan, and staff recommends that you adopt a recommendation of disapproval. staff recognizes that the industry has changed and really the real world application of what people consider a laboratory, a lif in our current code and the way we define t, as currently propos the biotechnology activities within thew1 definition of laboratory does not changillustrates an additional example. but a lot of or all of this is already covered within the laboratory definition, some examples of this testing, fertility specialists. so again all of this fits under the

we can, you know, reform policies like ceqa to avoid litigation abuse for non-environmental purposes we can change zoning to allow, you know, cost effective, high density construction in our cities. we can reduce some of the exorbitant impact fees. i mean, some some housing projects are killed because, you know, each each unit of housing is going to cost $200,000 in fees before the project even breaks ground. so things like that have made it very, very difficult to build new housing. and of course, it's a very simple supply and demand issue you don't have to be an economist to understand that. right you know, if we have a really high demand and a short supply, it's just going to be impossible to create that affordability that we so desire in the bay area. >devin>you know very quickly, we don't have much time, but we've talked about some of this stuff, but it is really the $64 trillion question, how do we get more houses built and therefore get it down? how do we finally do something that's meaningful to kind of untie that knot that's made it so difficult to either afford to stay here

there has since been a ceqa o project and it has been scheduled for the board of supervisors in septembertion appeal atf ap whatever the outcome of thet 700 indiana would notsted through a application in b there may also be? other pot impacted projects, but most orll enough to be approved over the counter not support. this proposed ordin the generalyoudopt a recommendation of disapprnis has changed and really ratory, a life science. it's different than we define these terms proposed, adding the biotechnology activities within the definition of laboratory change the definition. it merely illustrates an additional example. but ar all of thi within the laboratoryon, some examples of thga include medical research, food fits under the definition. proposed amendment doesre. additionally, this amendment does not resolve anyvitween the la life science, and theepar ordinances will er that code, rather than between these terms. the some potential solutions to avoid these confusing definitions and land useon would also be to eliminate the life scie which again, just adds or continues tonfusion p zon