what did you make of cerro matthews' . make of cerro matthews' testimony, the deputy press secretary,donald trump throughout the campaign, she had seen the impact of his words on supporters. they latch on to what she says —— he says and he was pouring gasoline on the fire. does that mean anything legally?- the fire. does that mean anything legally? the fire. does that mean an hinu leaall ? . ., anything legally? that reeks to me of recklessness. _ anything legally? that reeks to me of recklessness. maybe - me of recklessness. maybe criminal negligence. that is not enough. if you want to bring seditious conspiracy type or insurrection type charge, you need to show intent, you need to show the president specifically intended for his supporters to be armed and caused violence on capitol hill that day. you can try to infer that, you can say he was grossly negligent because he said certain things and knew people would take his tweets and speeches and run with them and, yes, you possibly knew some of them were armed, but did he tell them to cause violence, did he tell them to use weapons at