cfc. we abuse our own discretion. -- abused our own discretion. i do not feel anything new has taken place, and mr. wagner, something to the fact that i did not go along with the fact that this was standard. i absolutely agree. had the findings clearly reflected that, i would have voted for it. but what i would not vote for is to have this board declared that were started without a permit without dbi, to that effect. and to go beyond that, you know, the resale and sale of legal drugs, we had had an affidavit that there was a nexus. in the papers, we had heard something about there may be some nexus, and then we read further that there was some negotiation, and the permit holder could mitigate these problems. then, no one showed up en for that conversation. -- showed up for that conversation. one additional pharmacy is going to exacerbate this problem -- i did not say that flippantly, because i do not feel flip about it. i think it is a terrible situation in the tenderloin. i am very sympathetic to everyone who lives there. and i wish the police de

talks about what happened when we as a nation were working on controlling and removing ozone depleting cfc's and some of the quotes in here where that the air-conditioning and refrigeration institute warned that we will see shutdowns of refrigerated equipment in supermarkets and went on to say we will see shutdowns of chiller machines which cool our office buildings, roads in our hospitals. according to the epa and this will be the." mack idea from the article, the phaseout happened five years faster than predicted and cost 30% less than expected. and i was working for a company that was called sears roebuck in major appliances, and it was doom and gloom about what was going to happen. people got it for me came in to buy their refrigerators to replace them. people understood it. what they were doing was making the air better for their children and i never heard a consumer complaint about what was moving forward and in fact it caused a lot of great increased technology and that, so thank you for the work that you do and i think lots of times we focus on what our problems when people are tryin

the provisions to limit ozone- destroying cfc's would shut down hospitals and businesses. they could, cleaner-burning gasoline. the acid rain provisions would cost electricity rates to skyrocket. we were able to forge bipartisan regional coalitions and enact the lot in 1990 that was stronger than the leading environmental bills from the previous congresses. at once the laws were enacted, the industry found way to meet the standards at minimal cost. this guy did not fall. it got a lot cleaner. -- the sky did not fall. on the democratic side, regional differences still mattered. ed markey and i needed to forge compromises with coal state members and will stay members and members represent industrial states like mike doyle from pennsylvania. industry and republican members approached the issue in new but divergent ways. the new industry approach was it welcomed the change. they wanted a clear direction for the nation. they said they could achieve aggressive goals as long as the policies were well structured. they could put a lot of people to work doing it. what was motivating

story that talks about what happened when we were working on controlling and removing ozone depleting cfc's. there was a warning that we would see shutdowns of chilling machines that warm that -- that cool our large hospitals. it happened five years faster than predicted and cost 30% less than expected. i was working for a company that did major appliances. it was doom and gloom about what was going to happen. people got it when they replaced the refrigerators. people understood it. they understood they were making the air better for their children. i never heard a consumer complaint about what was moving forward. in fact, it caused a lot of increase in technology. thank you for the work you do. i think lots of times we focus on what our problems with people understanding regulations and we do not celebrate our successes. i do want to talk about something i am concerned about. we talked about balancing your budget. the chairman has been very thoughtful on how we coordinate climate change and other things to make sure we use the best science and not duplicate it. yesterday we heard from the

the provisions to eliminate would destroying cfc's shut down hospitals. the oil industry said they could not make cleaner-burning -- the acid rain provisions would cause electricity rates to skyrocket. ultimately, we were able to forge bipartisan regional coalitions and to enact a law in 1990 that was stronger than the leading environmental bill from the previous congresses. once laws were enacted, industry found ways to meet the new standards at minimal cost. this guy did not fall like industry predicted. instead, it got a lot cleaner. the debate last congress over clean energy and climates legislation was fundamentally different preyed on the democratic side, regional issues still matter. industry and republican members approached the issue in new but completely divergent ways. the new industry approach was a welcome change. they wanted a clear direction for the nation trade they told congress that they could achieve aggressive goals as long as the park -- policies are well structured. they could put a lot of people to work doing it. what was motivating

the provisions to eliminate would destroying cfc's shut down hospitals. the oil industry said they could not make cleaner-burning -- the acid rain provisions would cause electricity rates to skyrocket. ultimately, we were able to forge bipartisan regional coalitions and to enact a law in 1990 that was stronger than the leading environmental bill from the previous congresses. once laws were enacted industry found ways t meet the new standards at minimal cost. this guy did not fall like industry predicted. instead, it got a lot cleaner. the debate last congress over clean energy and climates legislation was fundamentally different preyed on the democratic side, regional issues still matter. industry and republican members approached the issue in new but completely divergent ways. the new industry approach was a welcome change. they wanted a clear direction for the nation trade they told congress that they could achieve aggressive goa as long as the park -- policies are well structured. they could put a lot of people to work doing it. what was motivating sup

and that the provisions to eliminate ozone-destroying cfcs could shut down hospitals. d shut down hospitals. the oil industry said they could not make cleaner-burning -- the acid rain provisions would cause electricity rates to skyrocket. ultimately, we were able to forge bipartisan regional coalitions and to enact a law in 1990 that was stronger than the leading environmental bill from the previous congresses. once laws were enacted, industry found ways to meet the new standards at minimal cost. this guy did not fall like industry predicted. instead, it got a lot cleaner. the debate last congress over clean energy and climates legislation was fundamentally different preyed on the democratic side, regional issues still matter. industry and republican members approached the issue in new but completely divergent ways. the new industry approach was a welcome change. they wanted a clear direction for the nation trade they told congress that they could achieve aggressive goals as long as the park -- policies are well structured. they could put a lot of people to work doing

issued those but unfortunately for every job that was ever done site may say reroofing and give you a,cfc, but it does not say one family or two family, just describes the job and in the 1950s it was five years later that it said only for conditions in the building code. >> so if you -- this document is the key document for us to determine what is the legal use and occupancy of your building so we will always, if there's an issue we will go to the certificate of final completion and occupancy. that's you know, three story building and that's legally what you have according to our records. if you want to show us a mistakes has been made you bring that documentation forward. this is the key government document. someone mentioned the 3r report. it's a collection of records and not an original source. it's a collection saying yes there was a permit issued on such and such date. it's not the original. just a reference to the originals. if someone says my, 3r says two units but it's three, the 3r report is not the controlling document. it's simply an information compilation. here's a report on