when they got their cfc in 1950, it shows two flat. it appears the second unit was added later based on the record. >> the frog was always two units? >> as far as i can tell. the property -- the lot and was always two units? >> as far as i can tell. >> i actually agree with the appellant in this case. i think there are several requirements and were not met. i do not see any hardships. there are five of the monroe, and the fact there is not a widespread pattern of smaller lots, the only smaller lots nbwe see are oddly shaped but not necessarily the tiny losts the subdivision would create. i see parking as a problem. i did not agree with the explanation 7 and non-complying in the rear would be it sufficient or desirable outcome. those are my comments for now. >> i am a little bit in between. let me explain why. we have had two cases like this in the last two years. each had a slightly larger unit in one lot and a small unit on the other a lot. both have significant departures for lot size, and iun financing of for your unix -- financing

issued those but unfortunately for every job that was ever done site may say reroofing and give you a,cfc, but it does not say one family or two family, just describes the job and in the 1950s it was five years later that it said only for conditions in the building code. >> so if you -- this document is the key document for us to determine what is the legal use and occupancy of your building so we will always, if there's an issue we will go to the certificate of final completion and occupancy. that's you know, three story building and that's legally what you have according to our records. if you want to show us a mistakes has been made you bring that documentation forward. this is the key government document. someone mentioned the 3r report. it's a collection of records and not an original source. it's a collection saying yes there was a permit issued on such and such date. it's not the original. just a reference to the originals. if someone says my, 3r says two units but it's three, the 3r report is not the controlling document. it's simply an information compilation. here's a report on

take it forward and see what can be worked out on a permanent legal basis with a jar and -- hr and cfcause the testing schedule goes out many years. we had a meeting with the board regarding plan for interoperable the around the region for data and pictures, hoping to later be on a 700 mhz system that would connect the entire region. they ask for continuance till next week. i will keep you updated on how that goes forward. i attended the drug court graduation, 20 participants completed the program. there are over 1000 who have gone through in the percentages for success for those who have completed this program is astounding against those who do not. it is a great program. i believe in it wholeheartedly which might seem ironic for an old narcotics officer. it is the best way to go for people who are suffering from dependence on drugs. i spoke to the national federation of tourists, they like greater access to the neighborhoods. i said i would represent that to the mayor and i will. we met yesterday with some command staff members visiting from minneapolis and spoke to pretty much every