and in the table you identified four items, and cgoboc got a yes on each. is one wrong or did i just misread this? >> it looks -- >> one thing we included in the report on the appendix, the results of our benchmarking. there are -->> looks like that is incorrect, it should be 4 of 4. i'm sorry about that. >> no, actually looks like you are doing -- we are doing better than we think we are, which is what i always thought. >> so, i would like to thank you for a very thorough report. appreciate it very much. i think it's going to be really useful going forward. it's a great analysis to begin a review to see what steps going forward are appropriate. and accurately reflects the criteria that we use, how it measures against other existing, within the city and other similarly situated cities. so, thank you very much. yeah. we have other committee members that are not here today, so i'm sure this will be an item of discussion going forward at some point. but a great starting point. thank you. >> seeing no other comments, invite public comment on the presentation. >

bond financial statements be included in the next seagull block meeti meeting -- cgoboc, and how m.t.a. is managing the project without financial reports. moving funds between some funds and existing financial controls, there is a purpose for having financial controls and it appears in the absence of accurate financial reports, existing financial controls be maintained and not weakened. thank you. >> thank you. should we go on to resume the original agenda items that have been set out? we have done roll call, go to the second item on the original agenda. >> item 2, opportunity for the public to comment on any matters in the committee's jurisdiction that are not on the agenda. >> seeing none, go to the next item. >> item 3, approval, with possible modification minutes of the january 2018 meeting. >> motion to approve. >> i do have a comment. it's really just, it's not substantive, but page two, it appears the content being reported under page -- item 4, and item 5 are related. relates to health bonds. so, my suggestion is just incorporate the two into one item. and subsequently renumber

is the liaisons work with the departments to identify the difference, or in the annual work plan, cgoboc retains detailed audits of the area, because obviously the costs are way out of line. thank you. jerry, in looking at the jail population, san francisco is carrying a large number of people who don't have bail. that's an issue that has come up. >> yeah. i think -- but what they're talking about here is the cost to house one person. >> are we housing people because they're not out on bail? there are bail reform efforts being done. >> there is also the issue of people who should in mental health programs, shouldn't be in the jail. this, i think, just deals with what it costs to house somebody, not why they're there. and irrespective of why they're there, the city should be doing a better job in maintaining or administering the cost per day. i agree with all the issues. >> i'm looking at how to reduce the cost since you highlighted how much it cost. thank you. >> mr. bush, through the chair, ben rose enfeld, controller, we have done other work, and i would be happy to provide them after