this is the famous letter in which pushkin argues chaadaev with chaadaev's view of russian history asory. yes, as a story that did not happen, precisely because this story is not european, because we found ourselves fenced off from europe and pushkin does not agree with him. pushkin just recalls some key moments, and russian history speaks about its tsars and speaks about important events. eh talks about the tatar-mongol invasion, thanks to which europe was saved and the most important words that are in this letter are words that, in a sense, can be considered our national idea, our credo if you remember the words that sound something like this, and as a person with prejudice, i am insulted pushkin writes that he doesn’t like much in modern life, and he lives, but for nothing in the world. i would not want to change the fatherland or have a different history than the one that god gave us. and this is probably the most important thing, that in pushkin there was, will be and remains pushkin is really our comrade. and pushkin really will never leave us ordinary people. thank you. it was

and to chaadaev love of hope, quiet glory, did not live long, we are deceived. we read the village.read liberty, and we know that these verses aroused indignation, and in the courtyard of the tsar and pushkin were threatened with terrible punishments to send him to themselves. uh, or exile him to solovki, and if not for the intercession of pushkin's friends karamzin zhukovsky, who was a teacher of the royal children, it is not known what fate awaited if only alexander sergeyevich, but the state, in this case, acted very wisely and very instructively, nevertheless carefully treating this young rebel, and it seems to me that there is some very deep in this, and talented people do not develop a lesson, but in a straight line man least of all looks like, uh, some kind of scheme or some kind of instruction that he must follow, and here is pushkin's liveliness pushkin's rebelliousness. pushkin's disobedience. pushkin's incredible craving for freedom, of course, is the most important feature of his personality, without whom there would be no monarchist pushkin there would be no statesman p

if you, my dear, refer to chaadaev, then quote to the end , nothing was created with us.tate, huddled in our shacks, stacked from logs and straw. he sees no prospects for the rapprochement of the west with russia with such a snubber, except for russia in the world order of personality. let's remember at least the victory of russia, perhaps . so, you are ready to lay down your head there for the happiness of the motherland. why do you say that? yes, imagine agree. how do you understand? happiness of the motherland do you know my happiness of the motherland? left somewhere far away in my childhood. i remember how i was walking along the embankment with my mother, very beautiful people went around the house, always with umbrellas, merchants sold a lemonade ice cream band played from a polished corpse. this is my homeland was born. my father went to war. the heart of a woman is long for the homeland, but honor for no one. since then i have been living like this. and what was your mother's name, maybe we knew her in the girlhood of nadezhda lopukhin, the maid of honor and her

uh, when i wrote the work, does the future of russia have the chaadaev letter there, analyzed and sothat the intelligentsia always took an anti-state position and anti-russian positions, this is why, by the way, the british said, it’s only the great great spoke, but i don’t know any journalists or some kind of there in england, uh, supposedly philosophers and so further. could they become such a terrible political force, what are the french so -called intellectuals? according to voltaire and others, they turned beau-marchais and other things turned france because he spoke correctly, but because these are what they call french the intelligentsia was the first, which, in general, made this revolution with these crazy ideas that ended in a gilylative one. well, then the dictatorship of bonaparte empire well, then the collapse of all this. eh, you understand, our intelligentsia followed the french intelligentsia. there are huge pieces of ducks willa reasoning that these people are groundless these people are irresponsible and these people, of course, live on the basis of some invented id